UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.  )

Filed by the Registrant

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Filed by the Registrant ☑
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

under
§240.14a-12

M&T BANK CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other thanother than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

required

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

materials

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) Rules
14a-6(i)(1)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

0-11


(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 


LOGO

 

 


LOGO

One M&T Plaza

Buffalo, New York 14203

March 8, 20215, 2024

Dear Shareholder,

You are cordially invited to attend the 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of M&T Bank Corporation to be held on Tuesday, April 20, 2021,16, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time.

This year’s meeting will be a virtual Annual Meeting conducted by live webcast only. You will be able to attend the meeting online as more fully described in the accompanying Noticenotice of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and proxy statement.

Shareholders will be asked to vote on the following matters at the virtual Annual Meeting:

1.

election of 1916 directors for one-year terms and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified;

2.

advisory approval of the 20202023 compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers;

3.

ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T Bank Corporation for the year ending December 31, 2021;2024; and

4.

transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments thereof.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares as promptly as possible via the internet, by telephone or by executing and returning your signed proxy card if one was mailed to you, as further described in the proxy statement.

We encourage you to carefully review this year’s notice and proxy statement, which contain important information about voting, attending the virtual meetingAnnual Meeting and the business to be conducted at the meeting.

In addition, we encourage you to read our Message to Shareholders accompanying the proxy statement.  This year’s Message to Shareholders discusses the unprecedented challenges of the past year and M&T’s continuing commitment to our customers and communities.  In particular, among other topics, the Message to Shareholders highlights how M&T responded to the disruptions brought by the pandemic and why our approach to being a bank for communities has never been more important.

Thank you for your continued support of M&T.

Sincerely,

 

LOGO

RENÉ F. JONES

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

 


LOGO

One M&T Plaza,

Buffalo, New York 14203

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TIME

11:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, April 16, 2024

PLACE

This year’s Annual Meeting will be held virtually and conducted solely online via webcast. Shareholders as of the record date will be able to attend and participate in the Annual Meeting by visiting: meetnow.global/MKWPZGK. Please see the accompanying proxy statement for important information about attending the virtual Annual Meeting.

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

(1)

Election of 16 directors for one-year terms and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

(2)

Advisory approval of the 2023 compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers.

(3)

Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T Bank Corporation for the year ending December 31, 2024.

(4)

Transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments thereof.

RECORD DATE

Shareholders of record of M&T’s common stock at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 22, 2024, are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

VOTING

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders as of the record date can vote their shares either during the virtual Annual Meeting or by proxy by using one of the following methods: (1) vote over the internet or by telephone using the instructions in the notice or proxy card; or (2) if you received a proxy card in the mail, complete, sign, date and promptly return the proxy card. Any proxy may be revoked in the manner described in the accompanying proxy statement. Any shareholder of record who attends the virtual Annual Meeting may withdraw his or her proxy and vote personally via the online platform during the Annual Meeting on any matter properly brought before the virtual Annual Meeting.

Please see the accompanying proxy statement for further information.

March 5, 2024

LOGO

MARIE KING

Corporate Secretary


IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON APRIL 20, 202116, 2024

The Proxy Statement, Messageproxy statement, as well as the message to Shareholdersshareholders and Form 10-K of M&T Bank Corporation (“M&T”) that together comprise our annual report for the year 2023, are available at www.edocumentview.com/MTB.

Virtual Meeting

Due to the continuing public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and to support the well-being of our employees and shareholders, weWe are holding the 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) in a virtual meeting format exclusively by webcast. No physical meeting will be held.

As more fully described in the “General Information—Questions &and Answers” section of the proxy statement, below, you are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting if, as of the close of business on February 25, 2021,22, 2024, you held shares of M&T common stock registered in your name (a “Registered Holder”), or if you held shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, and have a valid legal proxy for the Annual Meeting (a “Beneficial Holder”).

Both Registered Holders and Beneficial Holders will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, ask questions and vote during the meeting by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/204103780meetnow.global/MKWPZGK and following the instructions.  The password for the meeting, if requested, is MTB2021. Please have your control number, which can be found on your proxy card, notice or email previously received, to access the meeting.Annual Meeting. While we expect that the vast majority of Beneficial Holders will be able to participate using the control number received with their voting instruction form, there is no guarantee this option will be available for every type of Beneficial Holders’ control numbers, and some Beneficial Holders may instead have to register in advance of the Annual Meeting. Please see the “General Information—Questions and Answers” section of the proxy statement for more information.

Technical Support

We encourage shareholders to visit the meeting website above in advance of the Annual Meeting to familiarize themselves with the online access process. The virtual Annual Meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (except Internet Explorer) and devices that are equipped with the most updated version of applicable software and plugins.  Shareholders should verify their internet connection prior to the Annual Meeting.

Shareholders encountering difficulty with the Annual Meeting virtual platform during the sign-in process or at any time during the meeting may utilize technical support provided by M&T through Computershare.Computershare by calling 1-888-724-2416. Technical support information also is provided on the sign-in page for all shareholders.  If you have difficulty accessing the virtual Annual Meeting during check-in or during the meeting, please contact the technical support as indicated on the Annual Meeting sign-in page.  

Participation and Questions

Shareholders will have substantially the same opportunities to participate in our virtual Annual Meeting as they would have at an in-person meeting. Shareholders as of the record date will be able to attend, vote, examine the shareholder list, and submit questions during a portion of the meeting via the online platform. Shareholders may also submit questions in advance of the Annual Meeting by sending them via email to: ir@mtb.com. AllPlease send any questions submitted in advance of the Annual Meeting must be sent by 11:595:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 18, 2021.12, 2024.

Questions that comply with the Annual Meeting’s rules of conduct and that are germane to the purpose of the Annual Meeting will be answered during the meeting, subject to time constraints. If there are questions regarding matters of personal mattersconcern to a shareholder or if a question posed is not answered, M&T’s Market & Investor Relations Department will respond after the Annual Meeting. If we receive substantially similar questions from multiple shareholders, we willmay group them together. Prior to the Annual Meeting, the meeting website will contain details on other procedures and guidelines relevant to the Annual Meeting, as well as technical support information.

Even if you intend to be present atattend the virtual Annual Meeting, to ensure your shares are represented, please vote your shares in advance of the meeting over the internet or by telephone, or complete and return a physical proxy card by mail.


One M&T Plaza

Buffalo, New York 14203

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

March 8, 2021

MARIE KING

Corporate Secretary



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROXYSUMMARYProxy Summary

1

GENERAL INFORMATIONProposal 1QUESTIONS AND ANSWERSElection of Directors

13

9

PROPOSAL 1Nominees for Director

18

10

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

18

NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR

19

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

29

ElementsCorporate Governance of 2020 Directors’ Fees

29

M&T Bank Corporation Directors’ Stock Plan

29

18

2020 Director Compensation Table

29

M&T Bank Directors’ Fees

30

Director Stock Ownership Requirement

30

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF M&T BANK CORPORATION

31

Corporate Governance Standards

31

18

Availability of Corporate Governance StandardsBoard Composition, Diversity and Refreshment

18

Board Independence

21

31Board Leadership Structure

22

Board Self-Evaluation Process

22

Board Continuing Education and Orientation

22

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

23

Oversight of Sustainability and ESG Matters

24

Board Committees

25

Audit Committee

25

Compensation and Human Capital (C&HC) Committee

26

Executive Committee

26

Nomination and Governance (N&G) Committee

26

Risk Committee

27

Board and Committee Attendance

28

Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics

28

Communications with the Board

28

Majority Voting Standard for Director Elections

31

29

Codes of EthicsC&HC Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

31

29

Board SizeDirector Compensation

32

30

Board Diversity2023 Director Compensation Table

32

31

Board IndependenceStock Ownership Information

33

32

Board Leadership Structure

34

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

35

Board Attendance

36

Communications with the Board

36

Board Committees and Member Composition

36

Audit Committee

37

Executive Committee

37

Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee

37

Risk Committee

38

NOMINATION, COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

39

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

39

Directors and Named Executive Officers Stock Ownership Table

40

32

Beneficial Owners Holding More Than 5% of M&T Bank Corporation’s Common Stock Table

41

33

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

41

34

M&T Bank Corporation Insider Trading Policy

41

34

TRANSACTIONS WITH DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERSTransactions with Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Shareholders

42

35

PROPOSALProposal 2 – Advisory, Non-Binding Vote to Approve the 2023 Compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers

43

37

ADVISORY, NON-BINDING PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE 2020 COMPENSATION OF M&T BANK CORPORATION’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERSCompensation Discussion and Analysis

43

38

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

44

Named Executive Officers

44

38

Overview of M&T Bank Corporation

45

39

20202023 Financial Performance Highlights

45

39

i


Incentive Compensation Governance

63

Tax Matters

63

63
Compensation and Human Capital Committee Report64
Executive Compensation65

2020 Say-on-Pay Vote and Shareholder Outreach

64

NOMINATION, COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

64

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

65

20202023 Summary Compensation Table

65

CEO Pay Ratio

66

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

67

2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

67

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

68

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-End Table

68

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

71

2020 Options Exercised and Stock Vested Table

71

Pension Benefits

71

2020 Pension Benefits Table

71

Explanation of 2020 Pension Benefits Table

72

Qualified Pension Plan

72

Supplemental Pension Plan

73

NonqualifiedNon-qualified Deferred Compensation

74

2020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

74

Overview of Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

74

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

77

20202023 Post-Employment Benefits Table

77

Severance Pay PlanVersus Performance Disclosure

78

79

Accelerated VestingProposal 3 – Ratification of Equity Awardsthe Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of M&T Bank Corporation for the Year Ending December 31, 2024

78

83

PROPOSAL 3Independent Public Accountants

79

84

PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF M&T BANK CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021

79

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

80

Fees to Independent Auditors Table

80

84

Audit Fees

80

Audit-Related Fees

80

Tax Fees

80

All Other Fees

80

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

81

85

Report of the Audit Committee

81

85

NOTICE PURSUANT TO SECTIONNotice Pursuant to Section 726(d) OF THE NEW YORK BUSINESS CORPORATION LAWof the New York Business Corporation Law

82

86

OTHER MATTERSOther Matters

82

86
General Information – Questions and Answers87
Appendix A: Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP MeasuresA-1

 

 

ii

LOGO

 

i


PROXY SUMMARY

 

This proxy summary“proxy summary” highlights information contained in the proxy statement. It does not contain all of the information you should consider in making a voting decision, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.

M&T Bank Corporation (“M&T”&T,” “we,” “our,” or “we” or “our”the “company”) is providing theyou this proxy statement to you because its Board of Directors (the “Board”) is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares of M&T common stock at the 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 20, 2021 (the “Annual Meeting”), or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. The proxy materials are first being made available to shareholders of M&T on or about March 8, 2021.  

5, 2024. The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 16, 2024.

For information on the details of the voting process, how to attend the virtual Annual Meeting and other important procedures, please see “General Information—Questions and Answers” starting on page 13 below.

87.

Voting Matters and VoteBoard Recommendations

 

Matter:

Board VoteVoting

Recommendation:

For More Information, See:

1. Election of 1916 Directors

FOR EACH DIRECTOR
NOMINEE

Proposal 1—Election of Directors, page 18

9.

2. Advisory, Non-Binding Proposal on 20202023 Compensation of Named Executive Officers

FOR

FOR

Proposal 2—Advisory, Non-Binding Proposal Vote to Approve the 20202023 Compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers, page 43

37.

3. Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 20212024

FOR

FOR

Proposal 3—Proposal to RatifyRatification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Independent Registered Accounting Firm of M&T Bank Corporation for the Year Ending December 31, 2024, page 7983.

LOGO

1


About Our Company

M&T is a financial holding company headquartered in Buffalo, New York. M&T’s principal banking subsidiary, M&T Bank, provides banking products and services across the eastern United States from Maine to Virginia. Trust-related services are provided in select markets across the United States and abroad by M&T’s Wilmington Trust-affiliated companies and M&T Bank.

For more than 165 years, M&T has strived to take an active role in our communities and build long-lasting relationships with our customers.

 

 

LOGO

A Bank for Communities

We are a bank for communities—bringing the capabilities of a large bank with the care of a locally focused institution. Our purpose is to make a difference in people’s lives and uplift the communities we serve. The keys to our approach are characterized by responsible lending based on the advantages of local knowledge and scale, and our long history of being prudent stewards of our shareholders’ capital. We pride ourselves on deep local knowledge and understanding the unique needs of our customers and communities.

 

1


About Our Company

Our Purpose and Values

Our purpose and five core values define why we do what we do and how we act.

Our purpose: Why we’re here

 

LOGO

M&T Highlights (as of December 31, 2023)

• One of the 15 largest U.S.-based, commercial bank holding companies*

• National capabilities from our suite of specialty businesses and Wilmington Trust

• More than 22,200 employees

• More than 960 branches

• Contributed over $53.5 million to more than 4,250 nonprofit organizations through its charitable foundation and community sponsorships in 2023

• $208.3 billion in total assets

• $163.3 billion in total deposits

• Total shareholders’ equity of $27.0 billion

• Capital level in top quartile of peer group**:

10.98% Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital Ratio

• Net Interest Margin in top quartile of peer group**:

3.83% Net Interest Margin in 2023

*  Based on total assets, excluding certain non-U.S. bank holding companies and non-commercial banks

**  See page 45 of this proxy statement for information on M&T’s peer group

2

We make  a difference in people’s lives

 

LOGO

Our values: How we work

Our People

M&T recognizes employees are the difference makers that drive success. Our talent strategy focuses on recruiting, developing, promoting and retaining high-performing individuals of diverse backgrounds whose strengths align with M&T’s values, purpose and leadership competencies to create and maintain a highly competitive workforce. As of December 31, 2020, M&T employed more than 17,000 full-time and part-time employees, consisting of approximately 60% women and 23% people of color.

M&T strives to foster an inclusive environment through which the unique talents and perspectives of each employee are understood, valued, respected and leveraged.  M&T supports several employee resource group chapters that are voluntary, employee-driven groups organized around a particular shared interest or characteristic, such as race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation or differing abilities. Our diversity efforts are led by M&T’s Chief Diversity Officer, who is a member of our senior leadership team, and the Senior Leadership Diversity & Inclusion Council.  The Board also receives updates on M&T’s diversity, inclusion and belonging efforts.

M&T’s performance management philosophy is foundational to its employees’ success, focusing on reinforcing values, providing continuous, transparent feedback and recognizing and rewarding outstanding performance.  M&T helps empower employee performance and cultivate development through a variety of educational offerings.  M&T’s commitment to finding the best talent, creating a positive employee experience and fostering development results in a highly engaged employee base that drives company success. M&T conducts employee engagement surveys in regular intervals, including 15 surveys since 2001, with average participation rates above 90%, demonstrating a commitment to fostering candid, open and honest, two-way communication with employees.  Survey results are reviewed with senior management and shared with managers, who identify and implement improvements based on employees’ feedback.  The results are also presented to the Board.

2


Proposal 1 – 1—Election of Directors

M&T aims to maintain a highly engaged Board with balanced tenure and substantive expertise that has the diversity of skills and backgrounds necessary to effectively oversee our management team and serve the long-term interests of our shareholders.

We are asking our shareholders to elect all 1916 director nominees at the Annual Meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Each nominee is elected annually by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast in accordance with M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.cast.

Director Nominees

 

The following table provides summary information about each of our 19 nominees to serve on the Board.


Name

AgeBoard
Tenure
(1)
IndependentProfessional BackgroundCurrent
Committee
Membership
(2)

John P. Barnes

682 yearsFormer Chairman and CEO of People’s United Financial, Inc.R

Robert T. Brady(3)

8329 yearsFormer Chairman and CEO of Moog Inc.N&G (Chair),
E

Carlton J. Charles

651 yearSenior Vice President of Treasury and Risk Management, HearstN&G

Jane Chwick

612 yearsFormer Partner and Co-COO of the Technology Division at Goldman SachsR

William F. Cruger, Jr.

652 yearsFormer Vice Chairman of Investment Banking at J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.A

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

8123 yearsFormer Chairman and CEO of Premier National Bancorp, Inc. and Premier National BankA

Gary N. Geisel

7514 yearsFormer Chairman and CEO of Provident Bankshares Corporation and Provident BankC&HC (Chair),

E

Leslie V. Godridge

683 yearsFormer Vice Chair and Co-Head of Corporate and Commercial Banking for US BancorpR

René F. Jones(4)

596 yearsChairman and CEO of M&T and M&T BankE

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

666 yearsFormer Deputy Director and COO of the National Security AgencyR

Melinda R. Rich

6615 yearsChairman of Rich Products CorporationC&HC, E

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.

7825 yearsFormer President and CEO of M&TE (Chair),

R (Chair)

Denis J. Salamone

708 yearsFormer Chairman and CEO of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Hudson City Savings BankA (Chair)

Rudina Seseri

463 yearsFounder and Managing Partner of Glasswing Ventures, LLC

Kirk W. Walters

682 years

Former Senior Executive Vice President of

People’s United Financial, Inc.

Herbert L. Washington

7328 yearsPresident of HLW Fast Track, Inc.A, C&HC

 

(1)

3As of the 2024 Annual Meeting (April 16, 2024).

 


2021 Director Nominees

Name

Age

Director Since

Independent

Professional Background

Committee Membership (1)

C. Angela Bontempo

80

1991

Former President and CEO of Saint Vincent Heath System

AC (Chair)

Robert T. Brady (2)

80

1994

Former Chairman and CEO of Moog Inc.

NCGC, EC

Calvin G. Butler, Jr.

51

2020

Senior Executive VP of Exelon Corporation and CEO of its subsidiary, Exelon Utilities

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

78

2001

Former Chairman and CEO of Premier National Bancorp, Inc. and Premier National Bank

RC

Gary N. Geisel

72

2009

Former Chairman and CEO of Provident Bankshares Corporation and Provident Bank

NCGC (Chair), EC, RC

Leslie V. Godridge

65

2020

Former Vice Chair and Co-Head of Corporate and Commercial Banking for US Bancorp

Richard S. Gold

60

2017

 

President and COO of M&T and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (“M&T Bank”)

Richard A. Grossi

73

2015

Former Senior VP and CFO of Johns Hopkins Medicine

AC

René F. Jones (3)

56

2017

 

Chairman and CEO of M&T and M&T Bank

EC

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

63

2017

Former Deputy Director and COO of the National Security Agency

RC

Newton P.S. Merrill

81

2015

Former Head of Private Client Services, Personal Trust, Asset Management & Private Banking at The Bank of New York

Kevin J. Pearson

59

2018

 

Vice Chairman of M&T and M&T Bank

Melinda R. Rich

63

2009

Vice Chair of Rich Products Corporation

NCGC

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.

75

1999

Former President and CEO of M&T

EC (Chair)

Denis J. Salamone

67

2015

Former Chairman and CEO of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Hudson City Savings Bank

AC

John R. Scannell

57

2017

Chairman and CEO of Moog Inc.

NCGC

David S. Scharfstein

60

2017

Professor of Finance and Banking, and Senior Associate Dean of Doctoral Programs at Harvard Business School

AC

Rudina Seseri

43

2020

Founder and Managing Partner of Glasswing Ventures

Herbert L. Washington

70

1996

President of HLW Fast Track, Inc.

AC

(1)

(2)

The committee namescommittees of the M&T Board of Directors are as follows: AC—A—Audit Committee; EC—C&HC—Compensation and Human Capital Committee; E—Executive Committee; NCGC—N&G—Nomination Compensation and Governance Committee; RC—R—Risk Committee

Committee.

(2)

(3)

Mr. Brady serves as the non-executive Vice Chairman of the Board of Directorsand as the lead independent director.

(3)

(4)

Mr. Jones serves as the Chairman of the Board of DirectorsBoard.

LOGO

3

4


Board Composition

A balanced Board composition, supplemented by a thoughtful approach to director refreshment, is a priority for M&T. In discharging its duties to review director nominees, the Nomination and Governance Committee (the “N&G Committee”) considers the experience, skill set, independence and diversity of nominees in the full context of the current composition, needs and obligations of the Board.

Director Experience and Skills. The 16 director nominees represent a range of backgrounds, professions, skills, experiences and communities. The Board believes these complementary skills and experiences produce an effective and highly qualified Board.

The Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee (the “NCG Committee”), in discharging its duties to review director nominees, considersInformation on the experience, skills independence and diversity characteristics of nomineesthe Board, including a Board Skills Matrix, can be found in the full contextCorporate Governance of the current composition, needs and obligationsM&T Bank Corporation section of the Board.  this proxy statement.

Board Diversity, Tenure and Independence. M&T strives to foster an inclusive workplace where we respect and value individual differences. We believe that employee diversity enhances our company’s ability to succeed at all levels. Our Chairman and CEO is currently one of four Black CEOs leading a Fortune 500 company.*  Likewise, M&T also values diversity among its Board members.  The NCG Committee endeavors

In addition to identifyidentifying nominees that possess diverse business experiences, skill sets and geographic backgrounds.  In addition,backgrounds, the NCGN&G Committee believes a stronger Board is one that reflects gender and racial sexual orientation, national origindiversity. Our Chairman and ethnic diversity.CEO, René Jones, is one of fewer than 10 Black CEOs leading an S&P 500 company.* Since Mr. Jones became Chairman and CEO in late 2017, the percentage of diverse directors serving on the Board has increased from approximately 19% in 2017 to 41% of current directors and 44% of nominees at the Annual Meeting. The NCGN&G Committee also believes it is desirable to maintain a mix of experienced, longer-tenured directors who possess deep institutional knowledge along with newer directors who have different expertise, backgrounds and fresh perspectives.

 

LOGO

LOGO
LOGO

In 2020, the Board added three new directors, including two women and one person of color.  At the 20212024 Annual Meeting, over 42%approximately 44% of our 16 director nominees represent diverse constituencies, including four women and three people of color and one person from the LGBTQ community, an increase from 29% of the nominees at the 2020 Annual Meeting.color. The director nominees range in age from 4346 to 81,83, and the average age is 66. Nearly halfapproximately 68. Approximately 44% of the director nominees have served on the Board for five years or less.

* Fortune Magazine, “The lack of Black CEOs in the history of the Fortune 500,” February 1, 2020, https://fortune.com/longform/fortune-500-black-ceos-business-history.

*

5As of March 2023. Forbes, “Record Number of Black CEOs Will Run S&P 500 Companies,” March 1, 2023, www.forbes.com/sites/jaredcouncil/2023/03/01/record-number-of-black-ceos-will-run-sp-500-companies


See “Proposal 1—Election of Directors” and “Corporate Governance of M&T Bank Corporation” further below in this proxy statement for more information on our director nominees as well as Board qualifications, tenure, independence and diversity.

4

LOGO


LOGO

Corporate Governance Practices

The Board is committed to sound and effective corporate governance that conforms to the highest standards of business ethics and integrity, provides robust oversight of management and promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders. The Board reviews itsM&T’s Corporate Governance Standards annually andannually. It regularly reviews other governance practices, industry developments and shareholder feedback to ensurepromote continued effectiveness. Below are selected highlights of M&T’s corporate governance program.practices.

Board Composition and Refreshment

Robust Shareholder Rights

✓ Engaged Board with balanced tenure and substantial experience

✓ Bylaws include proxy access right

✓ Strong Board refreshment practices, with seven of the current director nominees joining the Board in the last four years

✓ All shareholders have the same voting rights

✓ Regular refreshment at the committee level

✓ Bylaws provide shareholders the ability to call a special meeting

✓ Ongoing and formalized director nominee identification and selection process based on needs identified by the Board

✓ No super-majority voting requirements under the Bylaws

✓ Diverse skills represented, including risk management, cybersecurity, leadership, finance, commercial and retail banking, technology, and corporate governance

✓ No poison pill or other anti-takeover devices in effect

Board Accountability and Independence

Board Effectiveness

✓ Audit Committee, Compensation and Human Capital Committee, Nomination and Governance Committee, and Risk Committee comprised entirely of independent directors

✓ Committee oversight of ESG strategy and policies, (Nomination and Governance Committee), diversity, equity and inclusion (Compensation and Human Capital Committee), climate risk (Risk Committee), and ESG public reporting (Audit Committee)

✓ Majority voting standard for director elections

✓ Lead independent director role and executive sessions of non-management directors held regularly

✓ All directors elected annually

✓ Strong Board leadership in risk oversight and management through Risk Committee and risk governance framework

✓ Conflict of interest policy for directors

✓ Annual Board and committee self-evaluations

✓ Stock ownership guidelines for directors and executives

✓ Independent Board evaluation of CEO performance and compensation through Compensation and Human Capital Committee

✓ Pledging and hedging policies for directors and executives

✓ Corporate Governance Standards and committee charters reviewed annually

✓ Directors are subject to over-boarding review

✓ Average attendance of directors at Board and committee meetings held in 2023 approximately 96%

See “Corporate Governance of M&T Bank Corporation” further below in this proxy statement for more information on our corporate governance practices.

 

Board Composition and Refreshment

Robust Shareholder Rights

Highly engaged Board with balanced tenure and substantial, wide-ranging expertise

Bylaws include proxy access right

Strong Board refreshment practices, with three new directors added in 2020 and nearly half of directors having a tenure of five years or less

All shareholders have the same voting rights

Regular refreshment at committee level

Bylaws provide shareholders the ability to call a special meeting

Ongoing director nominee identification and selection process

No supermajority voting requirements under Bylaws

Diverse skills represented, including risk management, accounting, commercial and retail banking, technology, community engagement and corporate governance

M&T does not have a poison pill or other anti-takeover devices in effect

 

LOGO

 

5

 

Board Accountability and Independence

Board Effectiveness

Audit, NCG and Risk Committees comprised entirely of independent directors

Strong Board leadership in risk management and oversight, including through Risk Committee and risk governance framework

Majority voting standard for director elections

Lead independent director role

All directors elected annually

Executive sessions of non-management directors held regularly

Conflict of Interest Policy for Directors

Annual Board and committee self-evaluations

Stock ownership requirements for directors and executives

Independent Board evaluation of CEO performance and compensation

Pledging and hedging policies for directors and executives

Corporate Governance Standards and committee charters reviewed annually

Directors are subject to over-boarding restrictions

Average attendance at Board and committee meetings held in 2020 approximately 97%

See “Corporate Governance of M&T Bank Corporation” further below in this proxy statement for more information on our corporate governance program.


Proposal 2—Advisory, Non-Binding Vote on 2023 Compensation of Named Executive Officers

We are asking our shareholders to review and vote, on an advisory basis, on the 2023 compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”). As described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, our executive compensation policies and practices are centered on creating a pay-for-performance culture that drives M&T performance, aligns the interests of our executives with the long-term interests of our shareholders and reduces incentives for unnecessary and excessive risk-taking.

 

LOGO


Executive Compensation Program

 

6


Corporate Citizenship, Community Involvement and Environmental Responsibility

At M&T our enduring purpose, for more than 160 years, has been to make a difference in people’s lives and communities.  For over 30 years we’ve been publishing an annual Message to Shareholders to create transparency into how our purpose drives our business model and philosophy.  

For example, our 1989 Message to Shareholders defined our philosophy as:  “… choosing longer-term benefits to the company and its stockholders over shorter-term, flashier results.  It often means foregoing the chance of speculative profit in order to avoid the risk of speculative loss.  It means recognizing that only the loan that helps the borrower is the one that gets repaid.  And it means acknowledging mistakes, moving quickly to correct them and cut the cost, and learning from the experience.”  This is just as true to us today as it was three decades ago.

As a company which is intimately connected to our customers and communities, we prioritize listening to our internal and external stakeholders.  What we’ve heard over the last year is a strong desire to increase the transparency about M&T’s impact on and how we monitor and mitigate the changing risks to our customers, communities, and environments.  

To that end, over the next year you’ll see a focus on transparency; starting with M&T’s first Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Report. While this is our first formal report, by revisiting our Messages to Shareholders of the past, you’ll see this work is not new to us.  Year after year our Message to Shareholders has focused on our stakeholder capitalism, including highlighting the impact of the public-private partnership we launched with a public school in 1993, the economic impact of M&T in its communities, our charitable contributions and volunteerism, our focus on low-to-moderate income mortgage lending, and our leading status as a Small Business Administration lender, to name just a few. As mentioned before, corporate responsibility is deep in our heritage.  

As a preview, our Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Report will expand the focus and transparency into our efforts and impact in 2020 to support all of our stakeholders, including:

ensuring new safe and affordable housing in our communities through $149 million in Low Income Housing Tax Credit investments,

how we’ve worked with NextJob, a reemployment solutions company, and referred 2,500+ mortgage customers looking for work to help them avoid foreclosure,

the journey we’ve been on to proactively help minority and women-owned businesses start, sustain, and grow their businesses, which has led to awards for M&T leadership and employees from the American Bankers Association, as well as 8 additional national and regional awards,*

how we continue to measure, invest in, and improve our employee engagement score—up 8 points year-over-year to 88% in 2020, representing the top quartile of financial institutions,**  

how we’re working to monitor and mitigate climate change risk and the $169 million of investments we made in renewable energy.

*  

2019-Finance Executive of the Year Award from MD Washington Minority Companies Association (MWMCA); 2019-Baltimore Business Journal 40 Under 40; 2019-Recipient of the Greater Baltimore Committee’s Bridging the Gap Achievement Award for Mentorship; 2019-Recipient of the Mayor’s Office of Small, Minority and Women Business award for the Small Business Resource Center Business of the Year and award for partnership on the office’s Morning Masters series and the 0-100 Accelerator Program; 2020-Selected for American Banker’s The Most Powerful Women In Banking Next list; 2020-Maryland Minority Contractors Association Honoree (MMCA) Resource Finance Executive for Minority Businesses; 2020-The Daily Record Leading Women Honoree; 2020-Co-Recipient of the American Banker Foundation’s George Bailey Distinguished Service Award; 2021-MD Washington Minority Companies Association (MWMCA) Black History Hero Honoree

**

Perceptyx reports, 2020

7


We’ll also share how we’re prioritizing and governing the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) work most material to our business model.  Among the key milestones we are committed to in 2021 are:  

as mentioned above, publishing our first ever Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Report aligned to industry frameworks and standards, and

creating a sustainable organizational and governance structure to advance our focus on corporate responsibility and sustainability aligned to industry ESG best practices.

In a constantly changing world, we’re confident that our purpose and approach to banking, through deep commitment and engagement with our communities, will continue to define and differentiate us.


8


Proposal 2 – Advisory, Non-Binding Vote on 2020 Compensation of Named Executive Officers

We are asking our shareholders to review and vote, on an advisory basis, on the 2020 compensation of our named executive officers (“NEOs”).  As described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement further below, our executive compensation policies and practices are centered on creating a pay-for-performance culture, driving M&T performance, aligning the interests of our executives with the long-term interests of our shareholders and reducing incentives for unnecessary and excessive risk-taking.

2020 Financial Performance Highlights

Our executive compensation program aims to create a culture of pay for performancepay-for-performance by offering short- and long-term incentive compensation opportunities that reward executives for their individual contributions as well as M&T’s long-term performance.

The 2020 financial results of M&T, and the banking industry overall, were materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in substantially curtailed economic activities and near zero short-term interest rates for the majority of the year.  The adverse economic conditions not only posed revenue challenges, but also resulted in elevated credit costs.  The concurrent adoption of Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) accounting guidance, that requires institutions to reserve for expected losses over the contractual term of the assets, further exacerbated the credit costs.  Strong performance in certain business segments and disciplined expense management aided in partly offsetting these adverse impacts to the 2020 financial results.(1)

 Diluted earnings per common share were $9.94 compared to $13.75 in 2019.

     GAAP-basis net income expressed as rate of return on average assets and average common shareholders’ equity of 1.00% and 8.72%, respectively, compared to 1.61% and 12.87% in 2019.

     Net interest income declined by 6.5% as the Federal Reserve took action to lower interest rates in response to the pandemic.

     Non-interest income excluding gains/losses on investment securities grew 2.7% from prior year, aided by strong residential mortgage and trust revenues.

     Expenses declined 2.4% from prior year as efforts to slow spending amid the pandemic resulted in lower expense driven by a decrease in incentives, professional services, marketing, and travel & entertainment expense.

     Net charge-offs expressed as a percentage of average loans was 0.26%, increasing from the low 2019 level of 0.16%, but still below M&T’s long-term average of 0.34%; total provision for credit losses was $800 million compared to $176 million in 2019, reflecting the reserve build for expected losses in the worsened economic conditions; provision expense for 2020 reflects the new CECL accounting guidance while 2019 provision reflected the incurred loss accounting methodology.

Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans outstanding increased to 1.76% at December 31, 2020, compared to 1.16% at December 31, 2019.

While building adequate reserves for the expected losses, M&T was also able to boost its Common Equity Tier 1 ratio, increasing to 10.0% at year-end 2020 from 9.73% at the end of 2019.  

During 2020, M&T maintained a quarterly common stock dividend per share of $1.10 resulting in $569 million payout to our shareholders.  M&T also repurchased 2.6 million shares of common stock valued at $374 million during the first quarter of 2020 before the economic conditions worsened.

(1) For more information, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  in M&T’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2021.

 

9


Executive Compensation Program

The following illustrates some important features of our executive compensation program:

What We Do:

What We Don’t Do:

   Strong alignment between pay and performance

X    Hedging or pledging of M&T securities (except in limited circumstances pursuant to prescribed policy)

   Discourage excessive risk taking through program design

X    Repricing of stock options

  Maintain robust Stock Ownership Guidelines

X    “Timing” of equity grants (i.e., we only grant long-term incentives on pre-determined dates)

  Retain an independent compensation consultant to advise and support the NCG Committee in its role

X    Tax gross-ups (other than in connection with relocation)

  Maintain a compensation forfeiture policy and subject incentives to risk adjustments

X    Pay dividends on unvested stock (starting with 2020 grants) or unearned performance units

  Review share utilization

X   Grant excessive severance, pension or other benefits

  Annual risk assessment of incentive compensation plans

X   Enter into employment contracts with our executives

Philosophy. Our executive compensation program provides for a mix of base salary, short-term cash incentives and long-term equity-based incentives that vest over time in alignment with our compensation philosophy and the objectives cited above.  

The charts below represent the 2020 performance year total compensation pay mix of our CEO and the average of all of our other NEOs.  For this purpose, compensation for the “performance year” consists of annual base salary as of the end of 2020, cash incentive paid in 2021 for 2020 performance, as well as the long-term incentive (“LTI”) award (target value) granted in 2021 for 2020 performance.  The charts below show the 2020 performance year pay mix targets for our CEO and the average for our other NEOs, of which 83% of pay is “at risk” for our CEO and, on average, 74% of pay is “at risk” for our other NEOs.


10


The components of our executive compensation program, described below, align with M&T’s philosophy to emphasize long-term equity-based compensation while providing executiveand provide competitive compensation opportunities that will attract and retain executive officers capable of achieving M&T’s performance objectives.

Compensation
Element

Objective

Determination of Award Levels and Key Features

Base Salary

    Provides fixed pay reflective of an executive’s role, responsibilities and individual performance

    Scope of Overseen by the executive’s responsibilities

    Experience

    Internal and external comparison

    Past and expected future performance  

Short-Term:

Cash Incentive*

    Provides discretionary annual incentive opportunity generally reflective of overall bank and individual performance; considers both quantitative and qualitative performance

Quantitative - reflects balance between financial and risk performance

Qualitative - progress towards key strategic initiatives and other individual performance factors

    Pool funded based on a percentage of net operating income (“NOI”)

    Rewards NEOs based on:

    Corporate performance as reflected by financial results (including key metrics such as NOI, EPS, Return on Tangible Common Equity (“ROTCE”) and returns to shareholders)

    Achievement of annual performance objectives (financial and non-financial)

    Risk management and adherence to risk appetite

    Other key strategic initiatives for the year

Long-Term:

Equity-Based Incentive*

    Provides discretionary equity-based incentive opportunity generally reflective of overall bank and individual performance

    Aligns rewards with sustained long-term shareholder value

    Provides a strong retention tool

    Unearned/unvested awards subject to forfeiture

     Equity-based incentives awarded to NEOs in the form of performance-based stock unit awards and stock options

    Performance-Based Stock Unit Awards Key Features:

    Performance Hurdled Stock Units (“PHSUs”)

oVesting: Ratably at target over 3 years

oPerformance Metric: Absolute ROTCE

Performance Vested Stock Units (“PVSUs”)

oVesting: Cliff vest after 3-year performance period with final payout ranging from 0%-150% of target based on performance

oPerformance Metric: Absolute ROTCE and Relative ROTCE to peer group

    Stock Options Key Features:

    Vesting: 3-year annual pro-rata

    Option Term: 10 years

    Rewards NEOs based on:

    Roles/responsibilities and expected future contribution

    Corporate performance relative to peers

    Absolute corporate performance for the immediately preceding year relative to the business plan

    Absolute and relative corporate performance over the three-year period from date of grant

    Long-term, sustained corporate performance

    Peer compensation market data

* See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below for more information on applicableHuman Capital (“C&HC”) Committee, this philosophy allows us to align our compensation with performance metrics.

See “Proposal 2—Advisory, Non-Binding Proposal to Approve the 2020 Compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers” further below in this proxy statement for more information on our executive compensation program.

11


Proposal 3 – Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2021by:

 

We are asking shareholders• linking the size of individual equity awards to ratify the appointmentNEO’s role, responsibilities and prior and anticipated future contributions, as well as to the performance of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.  M&T;

 

The Audit Committee annually evaluates• tying a significant portion of each NEO’s ultimate realized compensation to the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditor.  As a result of this evaluation, on February 16, 2021, the Audit Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2021.  The Audit Committee and Board believe the continued retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is in the best interests of M&T and its shareholders.

See “Proposal 3—Proposal to Ratify the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of M&T Bank Corporation for the Year Ending December 31, 2021” further below in this proxy statement for more information on the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.

12


PROXY STATEMENT

GENERAL INFORMATION – QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Why am I being provided this proxy statement?

M&T is providing this proxy statement to you because its Board is soliciting your proxy to vote your sharesfuture value of M&T common stock, atin alignment with our shareholders;

• balancing growth with prudent risk taking, including through the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.  This proxy statement contains information about mattersC&HC Committee’s consideration of each NEO’s performance with respect to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting and certain other information required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)risk management and the New Yorkuse of performance-based stock unit awards that vest in alignment with levels of performance;

• creating a culture of stock ownership and retention, including through M&T’s Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

We are first making available this proxy statementOwnership and the accompanying form of proxy on or about March 8, 2021 to M&T common stock shareholders of record as of February 25, 2021.  A copy of M&T’s Message to Shareholders and Form 10-K, includingRetention Guidelines for Executives, resulting in each NEO having a substantial financial statements, which together comprise our Annual Report for the year 2020, are being made available along with this proxy statement but are not part of this proxy statement.

When and where will the Annual Meeting be held?

The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 20, 2021, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time.  Duestake tied to the continuing public health impactlong-term performance of M&T and further ensuring our NEOs’ alignment with shareholders;

• performing, for each NEO, an annual assessment of the COVID-19 pandemic“market price of the seat” and balancing external data with an executive’s experience, role, responsibilities and prior and anticipated future contributions; and

• assessing short-term performance and awarding variable compensation based on a balanced discretionary assessment of holistic bank and individual performance.

The following illustrates some important features of our executive compensation program:

What We Do:What We Don’t Do:

✓ Strong alignment between pay and performance

LOGOHedging or pledging of M&T securities (except in limited circumstances pursuant to prescribed policy)

✓ Discourage excessive risk taking through program design

LOGORepricing of stock options

✓ Maintain robust Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines

LOGO“Timing” of equity grants (i.e., instead, we only grant long-term incentives on pre-determined dates)

✓ Retain an independent compensation consultant to advise and support the well-beingC&HC Committee in its role

LOGOTax gross-ups (other than in connection with relocation)

✓ Maintain a compensation forfeiture policy which subjects incentives to risk adjustments

LOGOPay dividends on unvested stock units or unearned performance units

✓ Review share utilization

LOGOGrant excessive severance, pension or other benefits

✓ Annual risk assessment of incentive compensation plans

LOGOEnter into employment contracts with our employees andexecutives

✓ Routinely engage with shareholders we are holding this year’s Annual Meeting

✓ Use a peer group to provide perspective on competitive pay levels

6

LOGO


Total Compensation Pay Mix

Our executive compensation program provides for a mix of base salary, short-term cash incentives and long-term equity-based incentives that vest over time in alignment with our compensation philosophy and the objectives cited above.

The charts below show the 2023 performance year total compensation pay mix of our CEO and the average of our other NEOs. For this purpose, compensation for the “performance year” consists of (i) annual base salary as of the end of 2023, (ii) short-term cash incentive (“STI”) paid in 2024 for 2023 performance, and (iii) the long-term equity-based incentive (“LTI”) award (target value) granted in 2024 for 2023 performance.

Our LTI award is a mix of performance-vested stock units (“PVSUs”), performance-hurdled stock units (“PHSUs”) and non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”). As shown here, 88% of 2023 performance year target pay is “at risk” for our CEO and, on average, 83% is “at risk” for our other NEOs.

LOGOLOGO

* Excludes one NEO (Doris Meister) who was not granted an LTI award in 2024 in light of her upcoming transition to a virtual meeting format only.  There is no physical location for the meeting.

Who is entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Common stock shareholders of record at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 25, 2021 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.  On February 25, 2021, M&T had outstanding 128,634,289 shares of common stock, $0.50 par value per share.  Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote.  Shares may not be voted at the Annual Meeting unless the owner is present or represented by proxy,consulting role as more fully explained in this proxy statement.

How do I attend, vote and ask questions at the Annual Meeting?

You are entitled to participatedescribed in the Annual Meeting if, as of the close of business on February 25, 2021, you held shares of M&T common stock registered in your name (a “Registered Holder”), or if you held shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker,Compensation Discussion and have a valid legal proxy for the Annual Meeting (a “Beneficial Holder”). Analysis section below.

As described in more detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement:

 

If you are a Registered Holder, you will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, ask questions and vote during the meeting by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/204103780 and following the instructions.  The password for the meeting, if requested, is MTB2021.  Please have your control number, which can be found on your proxy card, notice or email previously received, to access the meeting.

Annual base salary provides market-competitive, fixed pay reflective of an executive’s role, responsibilities and performance.

If you are a Beneficial Holder, you also will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, ask questions and vote during the meeting by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/204103780 and following the instructions.  The password for the meeting, if requested, is MTB2021.  Please have your control number, which can be found on your proxy card, notice or email previously received, to access the meeting. Please review this information prior to the Annual Meeting to ensure you have access. 

 

STIprovides a discretionary annual incentive opportunity that is reflective of overall bank and individual performance. STI is awarded on corporate performance, quantitative and qualitative business unit and individual performance, and progress toward strategic initiatives.

 

13


We encourage shareholders to visitPHSUsvest ratably at target each year over three years based on achievement of a pre-established performance hurdle for each year. If the meeting website above in advance ofperformance hurdle is not met for a given year, the Annual Meeting to familiarize themselves with the online access process.  The virtual Annual Meeting platform is fully supported across browsers and devices that are equipped with the most updated version of applicable software and plugins.  Shareholders should verify their internet connection prior to the Annual Meeting.

Shareholders encountering difficulty with the Annual Meeting virtual platform during the sign-in process or at any time during the meeting may utilize technical support provided by M&T through Computershare.  Technical support information is provided on the sign-in page for all shareholders.  If you have difficulty accessing the virtual Annual Meeting during check-in or during the meeting, please contact the technical support as indicated on the Annual Meeting sign-in page. 

Shareholders will have substantially the same opportunities to participate in our virtual Annual Meeting as they would have at an in-person meeting.  Shareholders as of the record date will be able to attend, vote, examine the shareholder list, and submit questions during a portion of the meeting viaaward scheduled to vest for the online platform.  Shareholders may also submit questions in advancecorresponding year will be forfeited.

PVSUs cliff vest after three years based on achievement of the Annual Meeting by sending them via email to: ir@mtb.com.  All questions submitted in advance of the Annual Meeting must be sent by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 18, 2021.

Questions that comply with the Annual Meeting’s rules of conduct and that are germane to the purpose of the Annual Meeting will be answered during the meeting, subject to time constraints.  If there are questions regarding personal matters or if a question posed is not answered, M&T’s Investor Relations Department will respond after the Annual Meeting.  If we receive substantially similar questions, we will group them together.  Prior to the Annual Meeting, the meeting website will contain details on other procedures and guidelines relevant to the Annual Meeting as well as technical support information.

Even if you intend to be present at the virtual Annual Meeting, to ensure your shares are represented, please vote your shares in advance of the meetingpre-established performance metrics over the internet orthree-year performance period, with final payout values ranging from 0% to 150% of target.

NQSOs align our NEOs’ interests with those of shareholders by telephone, or complete and return a physical proxy card by mail.

What is the difference between a Registered Holder and a Beneficial Holder?

If your shares of M&T common stock are registered in your name withproviding value only if M&T’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered to be a Registered Holder.  M&T will mail the notice directly to you (or will mail the printed proxy materials, including a proxy card, as requested). 

If your shares of M&T common stock are held by a broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary, then that intermediary is considered the shareholder of record, the shares are considered held in “street name,” and you are considered to be a Beneficial Holder.  This intermediary will send the notice to you (or will send the printed proxy materials with the intermediary’s voting instruction card, as requested).  As the Beneficial Holder of the shares, you have the right to direct your intermediary on how to vote and you are also invited to attend the virtual meeting.  However, if you are a Beneficial Holder, you are not the shareholder of record and in order to vote your shares during the meeting you must follow the instructions from your intermediary.  Please refer to the information your intermediary provided to you.  New York Stock Exchange rules do not permit an intermediary to vote street name shares on “non-routine” matters, such as the election of directors and executive compensation, unless it has received voting instructionsprice increases from the beneficial holder.  M&T encourages shareholders whose shares are held in street name to promptly direct their vote fordate the agenda items.stock option award is granted. NQSOs vest ratably over three years.

See “Proposal 2—Advisory, Non-Binding Vote to Approve the 2023 Compensation of M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers” further below in this proxy statement for more information.

 

LOGO

7


Proposal 3—Ratification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year Ending December 31, 2024

We are asking shareholders to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024.

The Audit Committee annually evaluates the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditor. As a result of this evaluation, on February 20, 2024, the Audit Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2024. The Audit Committee and Board believe the continued retention of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is in the best interests of M&T and its shareholders.

See “Proposal 3—Ratification of the Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm of M&T Bank Corporation for the Year Ending December 31, 2024” further below in this proxy statement for more information.

8

LOGO


LOGO

PROXY STATEMENT

 PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Upon the recommendation of the N&G Committee, the Board recommends the following 16 persons for election as directors of M&T, to hold office until the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

Each of the nominees was elected at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. One current director, Mr. John R. Scannell, is not a nominee and his term will end at the Annual Meeting. The Board would like to thank Mr. Scannell for his years of service and valuable contributions to M&T and the Board.

 

14


How are we distributing our proxy materials?

To expedite delivery, reduce costs

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH

OF THE 16 NOMINEES.

Each nominee’s business experience, including occupation, current public company directorships, and public company directorships held at any time during the past five years is provided. Additionally, the experience, qualifications and skills, including education, of each nominee are listed.

The information with respect to each nominee is as of March 1, 2024, and includes each nominee’s positions, if any, with M&T’s subsidiary banks, M&T Bank (also known as Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company) and decrease the environmental impact of our proxy materials, we are again using an SEC rule known as “Notice and Access” that allows us to furnish proxy materials over the internet instead of mailing paper copies of those materials to each shareholder. As a result, beginning on or about March 8, 2021, shareholders were sent a Notice of Internet Availability containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including this proxy statement as well as the Message to Shareholders and Form 10-K, over the internet.  If you received the notice, you will not receive paper copies of the proxy materials unless you request the materials by following the instructions in the notice.  The notice is not a proxy card that can be submitted to vote your shares.  Instead, the notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials. The notice also instructs you on how to vote via the internet.  Shareholders who have requested paper copies of the proxy materials will receive printed copies in the mail.

If you received paper copies of the proxy materials, but instead in the future would like to receive only the proxy materials electronically, you can elect to do so by: (i) following the instructions provided in the proxy card, if your shares are registered in your name (i.e., a Registered Holder), or (ii) by contacting your broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary, if you hold your shares in street name (i.e., a Beneficial Holder).

How can I vote by proxy?

You can vote by proxy by following the internet or telephone voting procedures described on the notice or proxy card or by completing and returning a physical proxy card or, if you are a Beneficial Holder and hold your shares in street name, by following the voting instruction card you receive from your broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary.  The internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate that you are a shareholder by use of a control number and allow you to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.  If you are a Registered Holder, the method by which you vote will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you later decide to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, as described above.

May I revoke my proxy?

How you hold your shares (Registered Holder or Beneficial Holder) determines how and when you may revoke your proxy.  A Registered Holder may revoke a proxy that has been previously given at any time before it is exercised by giving written notice of such revocation or by delivering a later dated proxy, in either case, to the Corporate Secretary, at One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203, or by attending and voting during the virtual Annual Meeting.  A Beneficial Holder of shares in street name must follow the instructions from his or her broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary to revoke his or her previously given proxy.

How will my proxy be voted?

Your proxy will be voted in accordance with the directions you provide.  If you sign, date and return your proxy card but do not specify how you want to vote your shares, your shares will be voted FOR the election as directors of the 19 persons named under the section titled “Nominees for Director;FOR approving, on an advisory basis, the 2020 compensation of M&T’s Named Executive Officers; and FOR ratifying the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2021.

15


What is required for a quorum at the Annual Meeting?

The presence, or presence by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.  Broker non-votes will be counted as being present or represented at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum, but, under NYSE rules, brokers will not be permitted to vote in the election of directors or on the advisory vote to approve the compensation of M&T’s Named Executive Officers unless specific voting instructions are provided to the broker.  We therefore encourage Beneficial Holders whose shares are held in street name to direct their vote for all agenda items on the form of proxy or instruction card sent by his or her broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary.

What happens if an incumbent director nominee does not receive a majority of votes in favor of his or her election?

Pursuant to M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, in an uncontested election of directors, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the nominee is required for the election of such nominee as a director, assuming a quorum is present or represented at the Annual Meeting.  If an incumbent director does not receive the required affirmative vote, that director would still be elected, but would be required to tender his or her resignation to the Board for consideration in accordance with M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.

What approval is necessary to approve Proposals 2 and 3?

For each of Proposals 2 and 3, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the 2020 compensation of M&T’s Named Executive Officers and to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2021, which means, the number of votes cast “for” a proposal must exceed the number of votes cast “against” the proposal.

An abstention will not constitute a vote cast and therefore will not affect the outcome of the vote on the election of directors, the advisory vote to approve the 2020 compensation of M&T’s Named Executive Officers, or the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2021.  Broker non-votes will not constitute votes cast for the election of directors or for the approval of the 2020 compensation of M&T’s Named Executive Officers, and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of either of these proposals.

Who is paying for the solicitation of proxies?

M&T will bear the cost of soliciting proxies in the accompanying form of proxy.  We are making this solicitation by mail, by telephone and in person using the services of employees of M&T or its subsidiaries at nominal cost.  We will reimburse brokers, trustees, banks and other intermediaries for expenses they incur in mailing proxy materials to beneficial owners of M&T’s common stock.

How do I propose actions for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders?

SEC Rule 14a-8

In order for a shareholder proposal for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be eligible for inclusion in M&T’s proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8, we must receive the proposal at our principal executive offices no later than November 8, 2021.  You must provide your proposal to us in writing and it must comply with the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8.

16


Advance Notice Procedures

M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws state that no business may be brought before an annual meeting of shareholders unless it is specified in the notice of the meeting or is otherwise brought before the meeting by the Board or by a shareholder entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting who has delivered notice to M&T (containing the information specified in M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws) no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which M&T first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders.  These advance notice procedures are separate from the SEC’s requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in M&T’s proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 referred to above.  A shareholder wishing to submit a proposal for consideration at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should do so no earlier than October 9, 2021 and no later than November 8, 2021.

Proxy Access Procedures

M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws permit a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, who has continuously owned at least 3% of the outstanding shares of M&T’s common stock for at least three years to nominate and include in our proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders director nominees constituting up to the greater of two directors or 20% of the total number of directors serving on the Board on the last day on which notice of a nomination may be delivered (known generally as “proxy access”).

The proxy access notice must be in writing and contain the information specified in M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws for a proxy access nomination and must be delivered no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which M&T first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders. A shareholder wishing to submit a proxy access notice regarding a nomination for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should do so no earlier than October 9, 2021 and no later than November 8, 2021.

These proxy access procedures are separate from the advance notice procedures referred to above, from the SEC’s requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in our proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 referred to above, and from the procedures you must follow to submit a director nominee for consideration by the NCG Committee as described in this proxy statement.

How do I discontinue multiple mailings?

In accordance with a notice sent to certain shareholders who receive paper copies of the proxy materials, multiple shareholders sharing a single address will receive only one copy of this proxy statement, the Message to Shareholders and Form 10-K, unless we have previously received other instructions.  This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce printing and postage costs.  If you are a Registered Holder and have more than one account in your name or at the same address as other shareholders of record, you may authorize M&T to discontinue mailings of multiple sets of proxy materials.  To discontinue multiple mailings, or to reinstate multiple mailings, please either mail your request to M&T Bank Corporation, Attention:  Shareholder Relations, One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203, or send your request to Shareholder Relations via electronic mail at ir@mtb.com.


17


PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, the Board recommends the following 19 persons for election as directors of M&T, to hold office until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.  With the exception of Mr. Calvin G. Butler, Jr., Ms. Leslie V. Godridge and Ms. Rudina Seseri, all of the nominees were elected at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Board elected Mr. Butler as a director on June 16, 2020 and elected Mses. Godridge and Seseri as directors on November 16, 2020.  Mr. John D. Hawke, Jr. is not standing for reelection and his term will end at the Annual Meeting.  The Board would like to thank Mr. Hawke for his years of service as a director and his valuable contributions to M&T.

If any nominee for any reason becomes unavailable for election, or if a vacancy occurs before the election (which events are not expected), it is intended that the shares represented by the proxies will be voted for such other person, if any, as the Board shall designate.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH
OF THE 19 NOMINEES.

Each nominee’s business experience, including occupation, current public company directorships, and public company directorships held at any time during the past five years is provided.  Additionally, the specific experience, qualifications and skills, including education, of each nominee that was considered by the NCG Committee are listed.  The information with respect to each nominee is as of March 1, 2021 and includes each nominee’s affiliations with M&T’s subsidiary banks, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (also known as “M&T Bank”) and Wilmington Trust, National Association (“Wilmington Trust, N.A.”). The information contained in this proxy statement concerning the nominees is based upon statements made or confirmed to M&T by or on behalf of such nominees, except to the extent certain information is contained in M&T’s records.

The Board believes that the experience, qualifications and skills of each of the director nominees contributes to an effective and well-functioning board providing oversight of M&T’s business and management.

 

18

 


LOGO

 

9


NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR

C. ANGELA BONTEMPO

Chair of the

Audit Committee

Director since 1991

Ms. Bontempo, age 80, is a self-employed health care consultant.  She formerly served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of Saint Vincent Health System in Erie, Pennsylvania, as President and Chief Executive Officer of Bryant & Stratton College, a system of proprietary colleges headquartered in Buffalo, New York, as Senior Vice President and Executive Director of the Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, New York and as a director of iPorta Corporation in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.  Ms. Bontempo also formerly served as a member of Niagara University’s Business School Council. She is Chair of the Audit Committee of M&T. Ms. Bontempo is also a director of M&T Bank and the Chair of its Examining Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Bontempo has extensive experience overseeing financial personnel and auditing and financial reporting.  She has considerable executive leadership and decision-making skills gained through her positions at not-for-profit organizations, privately held companies and professional associations.  Ms. Bontempo holds a Bachelor of Arts in Education and a Bachelor of Arts in Theology from St. Joseph’s College, an Associate in Applied Science in Nursing from Maria College, a Master of Science in Microbiology from Howard University and a Master of Health Administration from St. Louis University.  She holds an Advanced Certification (EMBA) in Healthcare Financial Management from Yale University.

ROBERT T. BRADY

Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors

Member of the Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee

Member of the

Executive Committee

Director since 1994

Mr. Brady, age 80, serves as Vice Chairman of M&T’s Board of Directors and as its lead independent director.  He is the former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Moog Inc. (NYSE: MOG.A), a worldwide manufacturer of control systems and components for aircraft, spacecraft, automated machinery and medical equipment.  Mr. Brady served as Moog’s Executive Chairman from 2011 until his retirement on January 31, 2014.  He is a director of Astronics Corporation (NASDAQ: ATRO) where he serves as a member of the Audit and Compensation Committees.  Mr. Brady is also a director of CUBRC, Inc., a research, development, testing and systems integration company as well as the Albright-Knox Art Gallery, both located in Buffalo, New York.  He previously served as a director of ENrG, Inc., Seneca Foods Corporation (NASDAQGS: SENEA) and of National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE: NFG).  Mr. Brady is a member of the Executive Committee and NCG Committee of M&T.  He is also director of M&T Bank and a member of its Executive Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Brady is an experienced and successful business leader with a track record of helping companies innovate, grow and create jobs.  He brings insight into risk management, operational risk and strategic planning.  In addition to his significant leadership experience with several public companies, Mr. Brady has considerable corporate governance experience.  He holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School.


19


CALVIN G. BUTLER, JR.

  Director since 2020

Mr. Butler, age 51, is a Senior Executive Vice President of Exelon Corporation (NASDAQ: EXC) and has been Chief Executive Officer of its subsidiary, Exelon Utilities, since December 2019 after being appointed the Interim Chief Executive Officer in October 2019.  He oversees Exelon Utilities’ six local electric and natural gas companies, which together form the nation's largest utility company by customer count.  Mr. Butler previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, an Exelon Corporation company, from March 2014 until December 2019.  Since joining Exelon in 2008, he has held various other senior managerial positions at the company with responsibilities in government, regulatory and external affairs, customer services and human resources.  Mr. Butler previously held leadership positions with RR Donnelly from 1999 to 2008 and worked at CILCORP (Central Illinois Light Company) from 1994 to 1999. He is a director of RLI Corporation (NYSE: RLI), serving as a member of its Audit and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees, and serves on the boards of several civil, advocacy and charitable organizations in and around the Baltimore area.  Mr. Butler is also a director of M&T Bank.  

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Butler has extensive executive management experience and brings considerable knowledge in the areas of regulatory affairs, customer service, external affairs, human resources and innovation and technology.  He also brings leadership experience in civic and community organizations. Mr. Butler holds a Bachelor of Science in Public Relations from Bradley University and a Juris Doctor from Washington University School of Law in St. Louis.

T. JEFFERSON CUNNINGHAM III

Member of the

Risk Committee

Director since 2001

Mr. Cunningham, age 78, is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Magnolia Capital Management, Ltd, a registered investment adviser in Cold Spring, New York.  He is the former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Premier National Bancorp, Inc. and Premier National Bank, and of Premier’s predecessors.  Mr. Cunningham had a distinguished career in various board and executive-level positions with several leading U.S. and European financial institutions.  He is a trustee of Open Space Institute, an environmental conservation organization dedicated to protecting significant landscapes in New York State, where he serves on several committees and as Chairman of its Compensation Committee.  Mr. Cunningham is an advisory board member of the Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley in Poughkeepsie, New York.  He is a member of the Risk Committee of M&T.  Mr. Cunningham is also a director of M&T Bank, a member of its Risk Committee and the Chairman of its Directors Advisory Council of the Hudson Valley Division.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Cunningham has extensive experience with commercial and investment banking strategy, both domestically and internationally.  He brings in-depth knowledge of risk management, fiduciary oversight responsibility and a valuable international perspective to M&T’s business activities.  Mr. Cunningham holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from Cornell University and a Master of Business Administration from Stanford University.

 

 

JOHN P. BARNES

 

20


GARY N. GEISEL

Chairman of the Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee

Member of the Executive Committee

Member of the

Risk Committee

Director since 2009

Mr. Geisel, age 72, is the retired former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Provident Bankshares Corporation and Provident Bank.  He previously served as Chairman of the Board of Saint Agnes Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland having served on its Finance, Governance, Compensation and Executive Committees.  Mr. Geisel is a former director of Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake and served as its Chairman and on the Executive Committee.  He is a former director of Annapolis Life Care, Inc., a continuing-care retirement community operator in Annapolis, Maryland, where he served as a member of its Finance and Audit Committee.  Mr. Geisel is also a member of the Finance Committee of the Baltimore Community Foundation.  He is a director of Urban Teachers, a non-profit teacher preparation program in Baltimore, Maryland, serving on the Finance Committee and Executive Committee. Mr. Geisel is the Chairman of the NCG Committee and a member of the Executive Committee and the Risk Committee of M&T. He is also a director of M&T Bank, a member of its Executive Committee and Risk Committee, and Chairman of its Directors Advisory Council of the Baltimore-Washington Division.  LOGO

 

Risk Committee Member

Director since

2022 

Mr. Barnes, age 68, is the former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of People’s United Financial, Inc. (“People’s United”). He served as Chief Executive Officer of People’s United from July 2010 until April 2022, when he joined the M&T Board upon the closing of M&T’s acquisition of People’s United. Mr. Barnes also previously served as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer for People’s United following its acquisition of Chittenden Corporation in early 2008. He had served as an Executive Vice President and in multiple other positions at Chittenden Corporation, including heading the Credit Policy and Administration Division. Mr. Barnes is a member of the Risk Committee of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Risk Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Barnes brings extensive banking and finance knowledge, having worked in the financial services industry since 1983, when he joined Chittenden Corporation after five years with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in Boston. He brings exceptional executive and management experience gained through his leadership roles at multiple financial institutions. Mr. Barnes is a graduate of Northeastern University and received a Master of Business Administration from the University of Vermont.

ROBERT T. BRADY

LOGO

Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and Lead Independent Director

Nomination and Governance Committee Chair

Executive Committee Member

Director since

1994 

Mr. Brady, age 83, serves as Vice Chairman of M&T’s Board of Directors and as its lead independent director. He is the former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Moog Inc. (NYSE: MOG.A), a worldwide manufacturer of control systems and components for aircraft, spacecraft, automated machinery and medical equipment. Mr. Brady served as Moog’s Executive Chairman from 2011 until his retirement in 2014. He is a director of Astronics Corporation (NASDAQ: ATRO) where he serves as lead independent director, chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Sustainability Committee. Mr. Brady is also a director of CUBRC, Inc., a research, development, testing and systems integration company located in Buffalo, New York. He previously served as a director of ENrG, Inc., Seneca Foods Corporation (NASDAQGS: SENEA), National Fuel Gas Company (NYSE: NFG), Acme Electric, and the Buffalo AKG Art Museum. Mr. Brady is a member of the Executive Committee and Chair of the Nomination and Governance Committee of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Executive Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Brady is an experienced and successful business leader with a track record of helping companies innovate, grow and create jobs. He brings insight into risk management, operational risk and strategic planning. In addition to his significant leadership experience with several public companies, Mr. Brady has considerable corporate governance experience. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School.

10

LOGO


CARLTON J. CHARLES

LOGO

Nomination and Governance Committee Member

Director since

2023 

Mr. Charles, age 65, is the Senior Vice President of Treasury and Risk Management at Hearst, a leading global, diversified information, services and media company with operations in 40 countries. Prior to joining Hearst, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Operational Risk Officer at Moody’s Corporation. Mr. Charles also serves as the Chair of Level Up Ventures, a venture capital unit within Hearst focused on Black and Latino entrepreneurs. He is a member of the Hearst Board of Directors and is on the Board of Advisors for HearstLab, Hearst’s platform for supporting early-stage, women-led companies. Mr. Charles also serves on the Advisory Board of BUILD, which teaches entrepreneurship to youth in underserved communities. He is a member of the Executive Leadership Council and a governance fellow at the National Association of Corporate Directors. Mr. Charles was previously on the Board of Trustees of St. Thomas Aquinas College and previously served on the Board of the Bronx Preparatory Charter School, where he chaired the Audit Committee. He is a member of the Nomination and Governance Committee of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Charles brings extensive experience and knowledge in corporate finance, risk management, cybersecurity, retail and consumer operations, and corporate governance. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Quantitative Economics and a Master of Public Policy from the State University of New York at Stony Brook and a Master of Business Administration in Finance from the University of Chicago.

JANE CHWICK

LOGO

Risk Committee Member

Director since

2022 

Ms. Chwick, age 61, served as a director of People’s United from 2017 until April 2022, when she joined the M&T Board upon the closing of M&T’s acquisition of People’s United. She previously served as a partner at Goldman Sachs where she had a 30-year career in technology, including most recently as the Co-Chief Operating Officer of the Technology Division. As Co-Chief Operating Officer, Ms. Chwick was responsible for financial business planning, setting the technical strategy and management of an 8,000-person organization within the firm. While at Goldman Sachs, she also served as a member of many governance committees, including the firm’s Finance Committee, the firm-wide New Activity Committee and the Technology Risk Committee, and she was Co-Chair of the Technology Division Operating Committee. Ms. Chwick was also the Co-founder and Co-CEO of Trewtec, Inc., providing corporate directors, chief executive officers and chief technology officers with the information to improve their oversight of a company’s technology division. She is a director of Voya Financial (NYSE: VOYA), MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX) and Thoughtworks Holding Inc. (NASDAQ: TWKS). At Voya Financial, Ms. Chwick is Chair of the Technology, Innovation and Operations Committee, a member of the Risk, Investment and Finance Committee, and a member of the Nomination, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee. At MarketAxess, she is Chair of the Risk Committee and a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. At Thoughtworks Holding Inc., Ms. Chwick is a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation and Talent Committee. She is a member of the Risk Committee of the Board. She is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Risk Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Chwick brings extensive technology experience, gained in a global financial services firm, combined with strategic perspective and in-depth knowledge of the financial services industry. She holds an undergraduate degree in Mathematics from Queens College, and a Master of Business Administration with a concentration in quantitative analysis from St. John’s University.

LOGO

11


WILLIAM F. CRUGER, JR.

LOGO

Audit Committee Member

Director since

2022 

Mr. Cruger, age 65, served as a director of People’s United from 2014 until April 2022, when he joined the M&T Board upon the closing of M&T’s acquisition of People’s United. He served as Vice Chairman of Investment Banking at J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., a leading global financial services firm, until August 2013. Mr. Cruger’s responsibilities included senior client relationship management and transaction leadership with a primary focus on financial institutions, among other sectors. He was Managing Director, Financial Institutions Group at J.P. Morgan Chase from 1996 until 2011 when he was elevated to the position of Vice Chairman. Mr. Cruger also ran the firm’s investment banking practices in Japan from 1991 to 1996, in Latin America from 1989 to 1991, and in Emerging Asia from 1984 to 1988. He is a director of MarketAxess Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: MKTX), serving as Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and a member of the Audit and Finance Committees, and of Virtu Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: VIRT), serving as Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Risk Committee. Mr. Cruger has also previously served as a director of Archipelago, Capital IQ and Credittrade. He is a member of the Audit Committee of the Board. Mr. Cruger is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Examining Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Cruger has diverse experience in investment banking at a global financial services firm and extensive knowledge of financial institutions and financial markets. His leadership roles as a director of other financial services firms and his international business experience bring critical skills and strategic insight to the Board. Mr. Cruger holds a Bachelor of Arts from Clark University and a Master of Business Administration from Columbia University.

T. JEFFERSON CUNNINGHAM III

LOGO

Audit Committee Member

Director since

2001 

Mr. Cunningham, age 81, is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Magnolia Capital Management, Ltd, a registered investment adviser in Cold Spring, New York. He is the former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Premier National Bancorp, Inc. and Premier National Bank, and of Premier’s predecessors. Mr. Cunningham had a distinguished career in various board and executive-level positions with several leading U.S. and European financial institutions. He is a trustee of Open Space Institute, an environmental conservation organization dedicated to protecting significant landscapes in New York State, where he serves on several committees and as Chairman of its Compensation Committee. Mr. Cunningham is an advisory board member of the Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley in Poughkeepsie, New York. He is a member of the Audit Committee of the Board. Mr. Cunningham is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, a member of its Examining Committee and the Chairman of its Directors Advisory Council of the Hudson Valley Division.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Cunningham has extensive experience with commercial and investment banking strategy, both domestically and internationally. He brings in-depth knowledge of risk management, fiduciary oversight responsibility and a valuable international perspective to M&T’s business activities. Mr. Cunningham holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from Cornell University and a Master of Business Administration from Stanford University.

12

LOGO


GARY N. GEISEL

LOGO

Chair of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee

Executive Committee Member

Director since

2009 

Mr. Geisel, age 75, is the retired former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Provident Bankshares Corporation and Provident Bank. He previously served as Chairman of the Board of Saint Agnes Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland having served on its Finance, Governance, Compensation and Executive Committees. Mr. Geisel is a former director of Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake and served as its Chairman and on the Executive Committee. He is a former director of Annapolis Life Care, Inc., a continuing-care retirement community operator in Annapolis, Maryland, where he served as a member of its Finance and Audit Committee. Mr. Geisel is also a member of the Budget and Finance Committee of the Baltimore Community Foundation. He is the past Chair of the Finance Committee of Urban Teachers, a non-profit teacher preparation program in Baltimore, Maryland. Mr. Geisel is the Chair of the Compensation and Human Capital Committee and a member of the Executive Committee of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, a member of its Executive Committee, and Chair of its Directors Advisory Council of the Baltimore-Washington Division.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Geisel brings financial acumen with over 35 years of experience in the banking industry as well as exceptional executive leadership. He holds a Bachelor of Science from Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, a Master of Business Administration from Duquesne University and completed banking programs at the Stonier Graduate School of Banking.

LESLIE V. GODRIDGE

LOGO

Risk Committee Member

Chair of the Trust and Investment Committee of M&T Bank

Director since

2020 

Ms. Godridge, age 68, served as Vice Chair and Co-Head of Corporate and Commercial Banking for U.S. Bancorp, member of the Managing Committee and served as director of U.S. Bank, N.A.’s Board of Directors, roles she held from 2016 until her retirement in 2020. She joined U.S. Bancorp in 2007 as Executive Vice President and Head of National Corporate & Special Industries and Global Treasury Management. Previously, Ms. Godridge worked for The Bank of New York for 25 years in a variety of senior managerial roles, culminating as Head of Consumer, Commercial, Private Banking and Asset Management. She has been recognized repeatedly on the American Banker’s list of the Most Powerful Women in Banking. Ms. Godridge is a director of Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBGI), serving as the Chair of the Audit Committee. She is also a director and Audit Committee member of National Integrity Life Insurance Co. and of Gerber Life Insurance Company and serves as a Trustee and the Treasurer of the Museum of the City of New York. She is a member of the Risk Committee of the Board. Ms. Godridge is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, a member of its Risk Committee and Chair of its Trust and Investment Committee. In addition, she is an Advisory Member of the Trust and Investment Committees of Wilmington Trust, N.A., a subsidiary of M&T, and Wilmington Trust Company, a subsidiary of M&T Bank.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Godridge brings extensive banking and finance knowledge with nearly 40 years of experience in the banking industry. She also brings exceptional executive and management experience gained through her senior executive positions at financial institutions. Ms. Godridge holds a Bachelor of Arts from Smith College and a Master of Business Administration from New York University Stern School of Business.

LOGO

13


RENÉ F. JONES

 

LESLIE V. GODRIDGE

  Director since 2020

Ms. Godridge, age 65, served as Vice Chair and Co-Head of Corporate and Commercial Banking for U.S. Bancorp and as a member of the Managing Committee of U.S. Bank, N.A.’s Board of Directors, roles she held from 2016 until her retirement in 2020. She joined U.S. Bancorp in 2007 as Executive Vice President and Head of National Corporate Special Industries and Global Treasury Management. Previously, Ms. Godridge worked for The Bank of New York for 25 years in a variety of senior managerial roles, culminating as Head of Consumer, Commercial, Private Banking and Asset Management. She has been recognized repeatedly on The American Banker's list of the Most Powerful Women in Banking. Ms. Godridge is a director of Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBGI) and serves as a trustee of the Museum of the City of New York.  She is also a director of M&T Bank.  

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Godridge brings extensive banking and finance knowledge with over 35 years of experience in the banking industry.  She also brings exceptional executive and management experience gained through her senior executive positions at financial institutions. Ms. Godridge holds a Bachelor of Arts from Smith College and a Master of Business Administration from New York University Stern School of Business.

 


LOGO

21


RICHARD S. GOLD

President and

Chief Operating Officer

Director since 2017

Mr. Gold, age 60, has been the President and Chief Operating Officer of M&T and of M&T Bank since December 20, 2017.  He served as an Executive Vice President of M&T from 2007 to 2017 and as Chief Risk Officer of M&T from 2014 to 2017.  Mr. Gold served as a Vice Chairman of M&T Bank from 2014 to 2017 and as Chief Risk Officer of M&T Bank from 2014 to 2017.  He was an Executive Vice President of M&T Bank from 2006 to 2014.  Mr. Gold is a director of M&T Bank, an Executive Vice President and a director of Wilmington Trust, N.A. and Wilmington Trust Company, and a Vice President and a director of The M&T Charitable Foundation.  He is a director of the Westminster Foundation in Buffalo, New York.  Mr. Gold is also a director of the Buffalo Niagara Partnership and a director of the Consumer Bankers Association.  He serves on the State University of New York at Buffalo’s School of Management Dean’s Advisory Council and has been an adjunct professor since 2012.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Gold joined M&T Bank in 1989 as an Executive Associate and has over 35 years of experience in banking.  He has served M&T Bank in numerous executive and managerial positions in the Retail Banking, Consumer Banking, Mortgage, Business Banking, Risk, Marketing, Human Resources, and Legal Divisions, which has provided him with valuable institutional knowledge.  Mr. Gold holds a Bachelor of Science from Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations and a Master of Business Administration from New York University Stern School of Business.

RICHARD A. GROSSI

Member of the

Audit Committee

Director since 2015

Mr. Grossi, age 73, is the former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland where he served as such from 1996 to 2015.  He currently serves as a consultant for healthcare and higher education organizations. Mr. Grossi has more than 40 years of experience in higher education and the health care industry.  He is a director of Biotechnology Institute of Maryland, a non-profit scientific training program in Baltimore, Maryland.  Mr. Grossi is a member of the Audit Committee of M&T.  He is also a director of M&T Bank, a member of its Examining Committee, and a member of its Directors Advisory Council of the Baltimore-Washington Division.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Grossi’s areas of expertise include financial analysis and management, organizational design and development, human resource management, systems selection and implementation, operational and financial responsibility for large functional units, and responsibility for major facility construction and control.  He is experienced in strategic planning, cash management and treasury, new business initiatives, trustee interactions in financial decisions, oversight of budgeting and capital planning, general accounting and financial reporting.  Mr. Grossi holds a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting and a Master of Business Administration in Financial Management from Pace University.

 


Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

 

22

Executive Committee Member

 


RENÉ F. JONES

Chief Executive Officer

Chairman of the

Board of Directors

Member of the

Executive Committee

Director since 2017

Mr. Jones, age 56,

Director since

2017 

Mr. Jones, age 59, has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of M&T and of M&T Bank since December 20, 2017.  He is a member of the Executive Committees of M&T and M&T Bank.  Mr. Jones served as an Executive Vice President of M&T from 2006 to 2017. He is a member of the Executive Committees of M&T and M&T Bank. Mr. Jones served as an Executive Vice President of M&T from 2006 to 2017, served as Chief Financial Officer of M&T and M&T Bank from 2005 to 2016 and as a Vice Chairman of M&T Bank from 2014 to 2017.  Mr. Jones serves as a director of ACV Auctions Inc., the Westminster Foundation in Buffalo, New York and the Jacobs Institute, a non-profit medical device innovation center in Buffalo, New York.  He is on the Board of Trustees of the Massachusetts Historical Society and is a trustee of the Burchfield Penney Art Center in Buffalo, New York.  Mr. Jones is also a member of the Federal Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve Board.  

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Jones joined M&T Bank in 1992 as an Executive Associate and has over 27 years of experience in banking.  He has served M&T Bank in numerous executive and managerial positions in the Finance, Wealth and Institutional Services, Human Resources, Consumer Lending, Mortgage, and Treasury Divisions which have provided him with valuable institutional knowledge.  Mr. Jones holds a Bachelor of Science in Management Science from Boston College and a Master of Business Administration with concentrations in Finance, Organization and Markets from the University of Rochester Simon School of Business.

RICHARD H. LEDGETT, JR.

Member of the Risk Committee

Director since 2017

Mr. Ledgett, age 63, is a private consultant. He served as Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer of the National Security Agency (“NSA”), the largest intelligence organization in the U.S., from January 2014 until his retirement in April 2017, and worked for the NSA for 29 years.  Mr. Ledgett is a Senior Visiting Fellow at The MITRE Corporation, a member of the U.S. Naval Academy’s Cyber Board of Advisors, the Institute for Defense Analyses, as well as the National Infrastructure Advisory Council. He has served as an instructor and course developer at the National Cryptologic School within the NSA in Washington, D.C. and as an adjunct faculty member at the National Intelligence University in Washington, D.C.  Mr. Ledgett is a member of the Risk Committee of M&T.  He is also a director of M&T Bank and a member of its Executive and Risk Committees.  

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Ledgett brings four decades of specialty expertise in the areas of intelligence, cyber security and cyber operations.  He holds a Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the State University of New York at Albany and a Master of Science in Strategic Intelligence from the Defense Intelligence College.


23


NEWTON P.S. MERRILL

Director since 2015

Mr. Merrill, age 81, is a private investor with a distinguished five-decade financial services career, including in executive positions at the Bank of Boston and The Bank of New York where he was the head of Private Client Services, Personal Trust, Asset Management and Private Banking businesses at his retirement in 2003.  He serves as a director of National Integrity Life Insurance Co. in Cincinnati, Ohio, as a director of Gerber Life Insurance Company, and as an Advisory Board Member and director of York Capital Management and related funds.  Mr. Merrill is also a director of FT Crosby Education Foundation, Inc., a non-profit educational foundation.  He is former Chairman of Mellon Optima L/S Strategy Fund LLC.  Mr. Merrill is a trustee and Chairman Emeritus of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, and a trustee and Chairman Emeritus of the Museum of the City of New York.  He is a director of M&T Bank and a member of its Trust and Investment Committee.  In addition, Mr. Merrill is an Advisory Member of the Trust and Investment Committees of Wilmington Trust, N.A. and Wilmington Trust Company.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Merrill has a wide range of banking and managerial experience with financial institutions and has considerable knowledge of investment banking and venture capital as well as private client services, asset management and fiduciary responsibility.  He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Engineering and Applied Physics from Harvard College.

KEVIN J. PEARSON

Vice Chairman

Director since

May 2018

Mr. Pearson, age 59, is Vice Chairman of M&T and M&T Bank and has been a director of M&T and M&T Bank since May 15, 2018.  He has overall responsibility for M&T Bank’s Commercial Banking Division, Credit, Technology and Operations, and the Wilmington Trust Wealth and Institutional Services Division.  Previously, Mr. Pearson served as an Executive Vice President of M&T from 2002 until his appointment as a Vice Chairman in February 2020.  Mr. Pearson is a member of the Trust and Investment Committee of M&T Bank.  He also serves as Chairman of the Board of Wilmington Trust, N.A. and Chairman of its Trust and Investment Committee and Chairman of the Board of Wilmington Trust Company and Chairman of its Trust and Investment Committee.  Mr. Pearson also serves as a trustee of Mercy Health Services and The Park School of Baltimore.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Pearson joined M&T in 1989 as part of the Private Banking Division in New

York City and has held a number of management positions in M&T Bank and

Wilmington Trust throughout his career.  These include management positions in commercial banking, commercial real estate, credit, technology and banking operations, and wealth and institutional services.  During his tenure with M&T, Mr. Pearson has also been the head of commercial lending in M&T Bank’s Tarrytown region, M&T’s Philadelphia Regional President and M&T’s New York City Metro-Area Executive. The variety of these management roles have provided him with valuable institutional knowledge.  Mr. Pearson holds a Bachelor of Science in Commerce and a Master of Business Administration from Santa Clara University.


24


MELINDA R. RICH

Member of the Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee

Director since 2009

Ms. Rich, age 63, is and has been since 2006 Vice Chairman of Rich Products Corporation, a privately owned global manufacturer and supplier of frozen foods headquartered in Buffalo, New York.  She is Chair of Rich Products Corporation’s Finance and Audit Committee, and Compensation and Organization Committee, and a member of its Executive Committee.  Ms. Rich is President of Rich Entertainment Group, which consists of various businesses in the sports, entertainment and restaurant industries.  She is a director of Rich Holdings, Inc., as well as several other entities within the Rich Products Corporation family of companies.  Ms. Rich is a director of Grove Entertainment, a production company in New York City.  She serves as a trustee of Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio.  Ms. Rich also serves on the Fund Advisory Committee of BDT Capital Partners in Chicago, Illinois.  She serves as a director of a number of charitable foundations, including Rich Family Foundation, DreamCatcher Foundation, Inc. and Cleveland Rock and Roll, Inc./ Rock & Roll Hall of Fame.  Ms. Rich is a former director of Wm. Wrigley, Jr. Company.  She is a member of the NCG Committee of M&T.  Ms. Rich is also a director of M&T Bank.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Rich brings considerable knowledge of executive compensation matters, leadership roles and service to civic and community organizations.  She provides a valuable international perspective on public policy, societal and economic issues.  Ms. Rich holds a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology from the University of Colorado.  She received an Honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters from the Culinary Institute of America, an Honorary Doctorate of Laws from D’Youville College and an Honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters from Canisius College.

ROBERT A. SADLER, JR.

Chairman of the Executive Committee

Director since 1999

Mr. Sadler, age 75, was a consultant to M&T from 2010 to April 1, 2017.  He joined M&T Bank in 1983 and held a number of executive positions, including Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors from 2007 until his retirement in June 2010.  From June 2005 to January 2007, Mr. Sadler served as President and Chief Executive Officer of M&T and M&T Bank. Mr. Sadler served as a director of Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROCK) from 2004 to 2015 and as a director of Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York until 2015.  He is Chairman of the Executive Committee of M&T.  Mr. Sadler is also a director of M&T Bank, Chairman of its Executive and Trust and Investment Committees and Chairman of its Directors Advisory Council of the Florida Division.  In addition, Mr. Sadler is a member of the Trust and Investment Committee of Wilmington Trust, N.A.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Sadler brings in-depth knowledge of the financial services industry including significant financial experience and valuable institutional knowledge through his executive roles with M&T.  He holds a Bachelor of Arts from Washington and Lee University and a Master of Business Administration from Emory University.


25


DENIS J. SALAMONE

Member of the Audit Committee

Director since 2015

Mr. Salamone, age 67, joined M&T’s Board of Directors effective with the closing of M&T’s acquisition of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Hudson City Savings Bank (“Hudson City”) in November 2015.  He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hudson City from September 2014 until November 1, 2015.  Mr. Salamone joined Hudson City in 2001 as Senior Executive Vice President and served on its Board of Directors.  Between 2002 and 2014, he held several senior executive positions at Hudson City, including President and Chief Operating Officer.  Prior to joining Hudson City, Mr. Salamone was an accountant with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for 26 years, 16 years as a partner where he served as the Global Financial Services leader for Audit and Business Advisory Services.  He is a member of the American Institute of CPAs and a member of the New York State Society of CPAs.  Mr. Salamone serves as Chairman of the Board of Trustees for St. Francis College in Brooklyn Heights, New York, as a trustee of the Ridgewood, New Jersey YMCA, and as a trustee and Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee of Valley Health System in Ridgewood, New Jersey.  He is a member of the Audit Committee of M&T.  Mr. Salamone is also a director of M&T Bank and a member of its Examining and Executive Committees.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Salamone has more than 35 years of experience in the financial services industry and brings significant accounting skills and knowledge of financial reporting and risk management.  He holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from St. Francis College.

JOHN R. SCANNELL

Member of the Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee

Director since 2017

Mr. Scannell, age 57, is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Moog Inc. (NYSE: MOG.A), a worldwide manufacturer of control systems and components for aircraft, spacecraft, automated machinery and medical equipment.  He was appointed Vice President of Moog in 2005 and Chief Financial Officer in 2007.  In 1999, Mr. Scannell became the General Manager of Moog Ireland and joined the Aircraft Group in East Aurora, New York in 2003.  He joined Moog in 1990 as an Engineering Manager of Moog Ireland and later become Operations Manager of Moog GmbH in Germany.  Mr. Scannell is a director of Albany International Corp. (NYSE: AIN) where he serves as a member of the Compensation Committee.  He is a member of the NCG Committee of M&T.  Mr. Scannell is also a director of M&T Bank.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Scannell brings significant business and management experience and valuable international business expertise.  He holds a Bachelor of Science and a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering from the University College at Cork, Ireland and a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School.

26


DAVID S. SCHARFSTEIN

Member of the Audit Committee

Director since 2017

Mr. Scharfstein, age 60, is the Edmund Cogswell Converse Professor of Finance and Banking and Senior Associate Dean, Doctoral Programs at Harvard Business School. He has served on the Harvard Business School faculty since 2003. From 1987 to 2003, he was a finance professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management. Mr. Scharfstein is a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, a former president of the American Finance Association, and a former member of the Financial Advisory Roundtable of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. From September 2009 to May 2010, he was a senior advisor to the U.S. Treasury Secretary. Mr. Scharfstein is a member of the Audit Committee of M&T. He is also director of M&T Bank and a member of its Examining Committee.  

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Scharfstein has published on a broad range of topics in corporate finance and banking.  He brings valuable perspectives in the areas of finance, risk management and capital management.  Mr. Scharfstein holds a Bachelor of Arts from Princeton University and a Doctor of Philosophy in Economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

RUDINA SESERI

Director since 2020

Ms. Seseri, age 43, is the Founder and Managing Partner of Glasswing Ventures, LLC, an early stage venture capital firm that invests in artificial intelligence and machine learning-enabled software companies that provide solutions for enterprise, cybersecurity, robotics and consumer markets.  Prior to founding Glasswing Ventures in 2015, she was a partner at Fairhaven Capital, a technology venture capital firm, from 2010 to 2015 after serving as an associate since 2007.  Ms. Seseri previously served as a Senior Manager in the Corporate Development Group at Microsoft Corporation, where she was responsible for leading acquisitions and investments in companies of strategic importance, and as an investment banker in the Technology Group at Credit Suisse Group AG, leading public market transactions.  She was appointed by the Dean of the Harvard Business School from 2014 to 2019 to serve as Entrepreneur in Residence and is a Harvard Business School inaugural member of Rock Venture Capital Partners. Ms. Seseri serves as a director of MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (NYSE: MSM) and as a member of its Nominating & Governance and Compensation Committees. She also serves on the boards of several private startup companies.  Ms. Seseri is also a director of M&T Bank.  

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Seseri brings over 18 years of investing and transactional experience, including in building successful technology companies in innovative fields such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, enterprise software and digital marketing technologies. She has significant knowledge in areas of technology, digital innovation, consumer solutions and strategic planning. Ms. Seseri holds a Bachelor of Arts from Wellesley College and a Master of Business Administration from the Harvard Business School.

27


HERBERT L. WASHINGTON

Member of the

Audit Committee

Director since 1996

Mr. Washington, age 70, has been President of H.L.W. Fast Track, Inc., a fast food restaurant enterprise located in Youngstown, Ohio, which owns and operates 23 McDonald’s franchises in Ohio and Pennsylvania since 1980.  He was appointed as a director to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for a three-year term in 1993.  Mr. Washington served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Buffalo Branch Board from 1992 to 1993.  He is a director of the Youngstown Ohio Chamber of Commerce and of the Big Ten Athletic Advisory Committee.  Mr. Washington is a member of the Audit Committee of M&T.  He is also a director of M&T Bank and a member of its Examining Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Washington brings extensive business acumen, valuable entrepreneurial skills and financial regulation experience.  He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Education from Michigan State University.


28


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth M&T’s 2020 compensation structure for directors’ fees (for directors who are not salaried officers of M&T or its subsidiaries):

Elements of 2020 Directors’ Fees

Fees

Compensation ($)

Annual Board Retainer

110,000

Board Attendance Fees – Per Meeting Attended

3,000

Committee Attendance Fees – Per Meeting Attended

3,000

Annual Audit Committee Chair Retainer

20,000

Annual Audit Committee (other than Chair) Retainer

10,000

Annual Risk Committee Chair Retainer

20,000

Annual Risk Committee (other than Chair) Retainer

10,000

Meetings with Regulators – Per Meeting Attended

3,000

M&T Bank Corporation Directors’ Stock Plan

Pursuant to the terms of the M&T Bank Corporation 2008 Directors’ Stock Plan (“Directors’ Stock Plan”), as amended, each director can elect to receive payment of his or her annual compensation in cash, in shares of M&T common stock, or in a combination of cash and shares of M&T common stock for services as a director.  Compensation is paid at the beginning of each calendar quarter in an amount equal to one quarter of a director’s annual retainer and the meeting fees earned during the prior quarter.  The number of shares of M&T common stock paid is determined by dividing the amount of such compensation payable in shares of M&T common stock by the closing price of M&T’s common stock on the NYSE on the business day immediately preceding the day the compensation is payable.  

The following table sets forth the compensation of M&T’s directors (who are not salaried officers of M&T or its subsidiaries) for the fiscal year 2020:

2020 Director Compensation

Name

Fees

Earned or

Paid in

Cash(1)  ($)

 

Stock

Awards(2) ($)

 

All Other

Compensation ($)

Total ($)

 

Brent D. Baird(3)

93.17

 

 

64,906.83

 

-

 

65,000.00

 

C. Angela Bontempo

 

93,683.72

 

 

93,316.28

 

-

 

187,000.00

 

Robert T. Brady

 

103,183.05

 

 

102,816.95

 

-

 

206,000.00

 

Calvin G. Butler, Jr.(3)

 

38,748.18

 

 

38,335.15

 

-

 

77,083.33

 

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

 

103,674.26

 

 

107,325.74

 

-

 

211,000.00

 

Gary N. Geisel

 

126,186.37

 

 

129,813.63

 

-

 

256,000.00

 

Leslie V. Godridge(3)

 

10,767.43

 

 

10,565.90

 

-

 

21,333.33

 

Richard A. Grossi

 

88,742.88

 

 

92,257.12

 

-

 

181,000.00

 

John D. Hawke, Jr.

 

217,000.00

 

-

 

-

 

217,000.00

 

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

 

112,744.73

 

 

112,255.27

 

-

 

225,000.00

 

Newton P.S. Merrill

 

77,732.65

 

 

77,267.35

 

-

 

155,000.00

 

Melinda R. Rich

 

80,841.05

 

 

80,158.95

 

-

 

161,000.00

 

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.

 

89,747.40

 

 

97,252.60

 

-

 

187,000.00

 

Denis J. Salamone

 

99,089.69

 

 

98,910.31

 

-

 

198,000.00

 

John R. Scannell

 

86,771.17

 

 

86,228.83

 

-

 

173,000.00

 

David S. Scharfstein

 

93,239.66

 

 

92,760.34

 

-

 

186,000.00

 

Rudina Seseri(3)

 

21,333.33

 

-

 

-

 

21,333.33

 

Herbert L. Washington

 

85,743.92

 

 

85,256.08

 

-

 

171,000.00

 

29


(1)

The amounts listed in this column show only the amount of directors’ fees paid in cash under the Directors’ Stock Plan, which is paid at the beginning of each calendar quarter for service during the prior quarter.

(2)

For all directors (except for Mr. Hawke and Ms. Seseri) the amounts listed in this column reflect the amount of directors’ fees delivered under the Directors’ Stock Plan in the form of M&T common stock, instead of in cash as elected by each director, which is paid at the beginning of each calendar quarter for service during the prior quarter.  The value of M&T common stock paid under the Directors’ Stock Plan is based on the grant date fair value, which equals the closing price of M&T common stock on the NYSE as of the business day immediately preceding the day the compensation is payable each quarter.  In addition, for each of Messrs. Baird, Cunningham, Geisel, Grossi and Sadler, the amount listed in this column also includes the grant date fair value of an annual equity award paid for his service on an M&T Bank Regional Directors Advisory Council (each, a “DAC Award”), which is granted under the M&T Bank Corporation 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan and is vested upon grant.  The grant date fair value of each annual DAC Award granted in 2020 as included in the column is based on the closing price of M&T common stock on the NYSE as of the grant date and is as follows for each director: (1) $25,500 for Mr. Baird; (2) $4,000 for Mr. Cunningham; (3) $4,000 for Mr. Geisel; (4) $4,000 for Mr. Grossi; and (5) $8,000 for Mr. Sadler.    

(3)

These directors served for a portion of 2020:  Mr. Baird served until his term ended at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 21, 2020; Mr. Butler began service upon his election to the Board on June 16, 2020; and Mses. Godridge and Seseri each began service upon their election to the Board on November 16, 2020.

M&T Bank Directors’ Fees and M&T Bank Regional Directors Advisory Council Fees

M&T directors, who also servefrom 2005 to 2016 and as directorsa Vice Chairman of M&T Bank if not salaried officers of M&T or its subsidiaries, receive attendance fees for each M&T Bank board or committee meeting attended, unless any such meeting is held concurrently withfrom 2014 to 2017. Mr. Jones serves as a meetingdirector and a member of the M&T board or committee.  Such attendance feesAudit Committee of ACV Auctions Inc. (NASDAQ: ACVA). He is also a director and member of the cash versus stock allocations are identical toAudit and Risk Committee of the scheduleFederal Reserve Bank of fees paid to directors of M&T for boardNew York and committee meetings attended described above and are reflected in the 2020 Director Compensation Table above.

Messrs. Baird, Cunningham, Geisel, Grossi and Sadler also received an annual equity award in 2020 for their service on an M&T Bank Regional Directors Advisory Council (“DAC”).  During 2020, Mr. Bairdpreviously served as a member of the DACFederal Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve Board. Mr. Jones serves as Vice Chair of the Board of the Bank Policy Institute and a steward for the Council for Inclusive Capitalism. He is also on the Board of Trustees of Boston College, a member of the UB Council of the State University of New York at Buffalo, and a director of the Pan-Massachusetts Challenge, Inc., a nonprofit that raises money for adult and pediatric cancer treatment and research.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Jones joined M&T Bank in 1992 as an Executive Associate and has 30 years of experience in banking. He has served M&T Bank in numerous executive and managerial positions in the Finance, Wealth and Institutional Services, Human Resources, Consumer Lending, Mortgage, and Treasury Divisions which have provided him with valuable institutional knowledge. Mr. Jones holds a Bachelor of Science in Management Science from Boston College and a Master of Business Administration with concentrations in Finance, Organization and Markets from the University of Rochester Simon School of Business.

RICHARD H. LEDGETT, JR.

LOGO

Risk Committee Member

Director since

2017 

Mr. Ledgett, age 66, is a private consultant. He served as Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer of the National Security Agency (“NSA”), the largest intelligence organization in the U.S., from January 2014 until his retirement in April 2017, and worked for the NSA for 29 years. Mr. Ledgett is Chair of Board of Trustees of the Institute for Defense Analyses, a member of a cyber advisory board of Beazley PLC, as well as a director of Elbit Systems of America. He has served as an instructor and course developer at the National Cryptologic School within the NSA in Washington, D.C. and as an adjunct faculty member at the National Intelligence University in Washington, D.C. Mr. Ledgett is a member of the Risk Committee of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Executive and Risk Committees.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Ledgett brings four decades of specialty expertise in the areas of intelligence, cybersecurity and cyber operations. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the State University of New York at Albany and a Master of Science in Strategic Intelligence from the Defense Intelligence College.

14

LOGO


MELINDA R. RICH

LOGO

Compensation and Human Capital Committee Member

Executive Committee Member

Director since

2009 

Ms. Rich, age 66, is the Chairman of Rich Holdings Inc, the holding company for international food company Rich Products Corporation and all Rich family business enterprises headquartered in Buffalo, New York. Prior to her appointment as Chairman in August 2022, Ms. Rich had served as Vice Chairman of Rich Products Corporation since 2006. She is Chair of Rich Products Corporation’s Executive Committee and Governance Committee and a member of its Finance and Audit Committee and Compensation and Organization Committee. Ms. Rich is also Chairman of Rich Entertainment Group, which consists of various businesses in the sports, entertainment and restaurant industries. She also serves as Chairman of several other entities within the Rich Products Corporation family of companies. Ms. Rich is a director and member of the Compensation Committee of Weber Inc., a leading manufacturer of outdoor grills and related products, and a director of Grove Entertainment, a production company in New York City. She serves as an Advisor of BDT Capital Partners in Chicago, Illinois and as a Director of the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio. Ms. Rich is also a director of a number of charitable foundations, including Rich Family Foundation, DreamCatcher Foundation, Inc. and Cleveland Rock and Roll, Inc./Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. She is a former director of Wm. Wrigley, Jr. Company. Ms. Rich is a member of the Executive and Compensation and Human Capital Committees of the Board. She is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Executive Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Rich brings considerable knowledge of executive compensation matters, leadership roles and service to civic and community organizations. She provides a valuable international perspective on public policy, societal and economic issues. Ms. Rich holds a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and Business from the University of Colorado. She received an Honorary Doctor of Humane Letters from the Culinary Institute of America, an Honorary Doctor of Law from D’Youville College and an Honorary Doctorate of Humane Letters from Canisius College.

ROBERT E. SADLER, JR.

LOGO

Chair of the Executive Committee

Chair of the Risk Committee

Director since

1999 

Mr. Sadler, age 78, joined M&T Bank in 1983 and held a number of executive positions, including Vice Chairman of the Board from 2007 until his retirement in June 2010. From June 2005 to January 2007, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of M&T and M&T Bank. Mr. Sadler served as a consultant to M&T from 2010 to April 2017. He served as a director of Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROCK) from 2004 to 2015 and as a director of Security Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York until 2015. Mr. Sadler is Chair of the Executive and Risk Committees of the Board. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and Chair of its Executive and Risk Committees. In addition, Mr. Sadler is Chair of M&T Bank’s Directors Advisory Council–Florida Division.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Sadler brings in-depth knowledge of the financial services industry including significant financial experience and valuable corporate governance, risk management and institutional knowledge. He holds a Bachelor of Arts from Washington and Lee University and a Master of Business Administration from Emory University.

LOGO

15


DENIS J. SALAMONE

LOGO

Chair of the Audit Committee

Director since

2015 

Mr. Salamone, age 70, joined the Board upon the closing of M&T’s acquisition of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. and Hudson City Savings Bank (“Hudson City”) in 2015. He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hudson City from September 2014 until November 2015. Mr. Salamone joined Hudson City in 2001 as Senior Executive Vice President and served on its Board of Directors. Between 2002 and 2014, he held several senior executive positions at Hudson City, including President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining Hudson City, Mr. Salamone was an accountant with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for 26 years, 16 years as a partner where he served as the Global Financial Services leader for Audit and Business Advisory Services. He is a member of the American Institute of CPAs and a member of the New York City/Long Island DivisionState Society of CPAs. Mr. Salamone serves as Chairman of the Board of Trustees for St. Francis College in Brooklyn Heights, New York, as a trustee of the Ridgewood, New Jersey YMCA, and as a trustee and Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee of Valley Health System in Ridgewood, New Jersey. He is the Chair of the Audit Committee of the Board. Mr. Salamone is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, the Chair of its Examining Committee and a member of its Executive Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Salamone has more than 40 years of experience in the financial services industry and brings significant accounting skills and knowledge of financial reporting and risk management. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from St. Francis College.

RUDINA SESERI

LOGO

Trust and Investment Committee of M&T Bank; Bank Member

Director since

2020 

Ms. Seseri, age 46, is the Founder and Managing Partner of Glasswing Ventures, LLC, an early-stage venture capital firm that invests in artificial intelligence and frontier technology companies that provide solutions in the enterprise and cybersecurity markets. Prior to founding Glasswing Ventures in 2015, she was a partner at Fairhaven Capital, a technology venture capital firm, from 2010 to 2015 after serving as an associate since 2007. Ms. Seseri previously served as a Senior Manager in the Corporate Development Group at Microsoft Corporation, where she was responsible for leading acquisitions and investments in companies of strategic importance, and as an investment banker in the Technology Group at Credit Suisse Group AG, leading public market transactions. She was appointed by the Dean of Harvard Business School as an Executive Fellow in 2022, having previously served as Entrepreneur in Residence in the Rock Center at Harvard Business School since 2013. Ms. Seseri serves as a director of MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (NYSE: MSM) and as a member of its Compensation Committee and of its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. She also serves on the boards of several private startup companies. Ms. Seseri is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Trust and Investment Committee. In addition, she is an advisory member of the Trust and Investment Committees of Wilmington Trust, N.A., a subsidiary of M&T, and Wilmington Trust Company, a subsidiary of M&T Bank.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Seseri brings nearly 20 years of investing and transactional experience, including in building successful technology companies in innovative fields such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, enterprise software, and digital marketing technologies. She has significant knowledge in areas of technology, digital innovation, consumer solutions and strategic planning. Ms. Seseri holds a Bachelor of Arts from Wellesley College and a Master of Business Administration from Harvard Business School.

16

LOGO


KIRK W. WALTERS

LOGO

Trust and Investment Committee of M&T Bank Member

Director since

2022 

Mr. CunninghamWalters, age 68, previously served as Senior Executive Vice President of Corporate Development and Strategic Planning as well as a director of People’s United. He joined the M&T Board upon the closing of M&T’s acquisition of People’s United in April 2022. In addition, from 2011 to 2014, Mr. Walters served as Chief Financial Officer of People’s United. Prior to joining People’s United, he was a Senior Executive Vice President and a director of Santander Holdings USA, Inc. Previously Mr. Walters held various senior executive positions with Chittenden Corporation from 1996 to 2008; Northeast Federal Corporation (including Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer) from 1989 to 1995; and CalFed, Inc. from 1984 to 1989. He began his career with Coopers & Lybrand and is a member of the California Society of CPAs. Mr. Walters is also actively involved in several philanthropic activities among which are AngelFlight and ImproveCareNow. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Trust and Investment Committee. In addition, he is an advisory member of the Trust and Investment Committees of Wilmington Trust, N.A., a subsidiary of M&T, and Wilmington Trust Company, a subsidiary of M&T Bank.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Walters brings substantial banking and financial services industry expertise. He has extensive executive and management experience gained through his leadership roles at various financial institutions. Mr. Walters holds a Bachelor of Science in Accounting from the University of Southern California.

HERBERT L. WASHINGTON

LOGO

Audit Committee Member

Compensation and Human Capital Committee Member

Director since

1996 

Mr. Washington, age 73, is President of H.L.W. Fast Track, Inc., a fast-food restaurant enterprise located in Youngstown, Ohio, which owned and operated McDonald’s franchises in Ohio and Pennsylvania from 1980 to 2022. He is a director of the Youngstown Ohio Chamber of Commerce and of the Big Ten Athletic Advisory Committee. Mr. Washington was appointed as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for a three-year term in 1993. He served as Chairman of the DACFederal Reserve Bank of the Hudson Valley Division of M&T Bank;New York, Buffalo Branch Board from 1992 to 1993. Mr. Geisel served as Chairman of the DAC of the Baltimore-Washington Division of M&T Bank; Mr. Grossi served asWashington is a member of the DACAudit Committee and Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the Baltimore-Washington DivisionBoard. He is also a director of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank, and a member of its Examining Committee.

Experience, Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Washington brings extensive business acumen, valuable entrepreneurial skills as well as human capital, corporate governance and financial regulation experience. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Education from Michigan State University.

LOGO

17


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF M&T BANK CORPORATION

Corporate Governance Standards

The Board is committed to sound and effective corporate governance that conforms to the highest standards of business ethics and integrity, provides robust oversight of management and promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders. The Board annually evaluates its Corporate Governance Standards in light of best practices and regulatory guidance. The Corporate Governance Standards are available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance. These standards address, among other items, director qualifications and responsibilities, board committees, director compensation and independence, director orientation and continuing education, performance evaluations, director commitments and conflicts of interest.

Board Composition, Diversity and Refreshment

Our Corporate Governance Standards provide that the N&G Committee, in discharging its duties to review director nominee qualifications, consider experience, skill set, independence and diversity in the context of Board needs and obligations. In light of these standards, the N&G Committee endeavors to identify nominees who possess diverse business experiences, life skills, geographic representation and community involvement.

Board Succession and Continuity Process. The Board, acting through the N&G Committee, reviews and considers new director candidates and existing members as part of its ongoing succession planning process for key Board and committee positions. The N&G Committee engages a third party, Ridgeway Partners, to assist in this process, including with the identification and evaluation of potential future director nominees. Based on contributions and feedback from the N&G Committee, other directors, executive management and Ridgeway Partners, a Board framework and analysis of the skills, experiences and attributes that M&T believes would be beneficial to have represented on the Board and its committees have been developed. This process takes into account the current needs of the Board, future director succession planning needs and M&T’s business strategy and industry trends. The importance of diversity in the composition of the Board has been a specific emphasis. The analysis of desired skills and attributes is leveraged throughout the process in identifying and evaluating Board candidates and considering committee assignments.

LOGO

18

LOGO


Diversity and Tenure. In identifying and recommending nominees to shareholders, our Board believes that its composition should also reflect gender, racial and other diversity. Since Mr. Jones became Chairman and CEO in late 2017, the percentage of diverse directors serving on the Board has increased from 19% to 41% of current directors and 44% of nominees at the Annual Meeting, which includes four women and three people of color. The Board also believes it is desirable to maintain a mix of experienced, longer-tenured directors who possess deep institutional knowledge along with newer directors who have different expertise, backgrounds and fresh perspectives. Over 40% of the director nominees have served on the Board for five years or less.

LOGO

LOGO

Board Size. We are asking our shareholders to vote for the election of 16 director nominees. The Board regularly evaluates its size and structure to provide effective oversight and best serve the needs of M&T Bank; and Mr. Sadler served as Chairmanthe interests of our shareholders and stakeholders. As a financial institution, M&T faces considerable and changing regulatory, risk management and economic demands that require a substantial commitment on the part of our directors. The size of our Board allows for an appropriate number of members to be designated to each committee with the skills, experience and time to provide proper and effective oversight. The diversity of viewpoints and skills on the Board and each committee also allows for an effective check and balance on proposals from management and directors. In addition, the number of independent directors aids in complying with the requisite independence standards of each Board committee.

Over-Boarding Policy. The Board also considers the availability of each candidate to fulfill his or her responsibilities as a director. Both the Corporate Governance Standards and the N&G Committee Charter require that the Board, through the N&G Committee, review a director’s ability to continue to serve as a director of M&T if he or she wishes to join another public company board and would serve on three or more other public company boards after accepting the invitation. In the case of a director who is also an executive officer of a public company, the N&G Committee will conduct such review whenever the director wishes to join another public company board, regardless of the number of other boards on which he or she sits. Each year, the N&G Committee receives a report on and reviews the outside board commitments of all director nominees when considering whether to recommend such directors as nominees.

LOGO

19


Board Skills and Experience. The 16 director nominees represent a range of backgrounds, professions, skills, experiences and communities. The Board believes these complementary skills and experiences produce an effective and highly qualified Board. The skills and diversity characteristics below were self-identified by the directors as part of the company’s annual director questionnaire process.

Board Skills and Experience Matrix

LOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGO

SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE

CEO
Experience

Commercial
Banking

Wealth / Investment
Management

Customer Experience / Retail

Technology / Digital Innovation

Cybersecurity

Risk Management

Corporate Governance

Bank
Regulatory

Finance / Accounting

Human Capital Management

BOARD DEMOGRAPHICS

Gender
Diversity

(Female)

(Female)

(Female)

(Female)

Race/Ethnicity
Diversity

(Black)

(Black)

(Black)

20

LOGO


Board Independence

In February 2024, the Board conducted its annual director independence review. Based upon the recommendation of the DACN&G Committee, the Board determined that of the Florida Division16 nominees standing for election as directors at the 2024 Annual Meeting (each of M&T Bank.  whom currently serves as a director), 15 meet the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) standards for independence, as well as Mr. Scannell who is not standing for election. Mr. Jones is the only director and nominee not determined to be independent.

The annual equity award for DAC service is granted underBoard applies the M&T Bank Corporation 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan”) and is vested upon grant.  The valuestandards of the equity awards for Messrs. Baird, Cunningham, Geisel, GrossiSecurities and Sadler is described further in the 2020 Director Compensation Table above.

Director Stock Ownership Requirement

UnderExchange Commission (“SEC”), NYSE and M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards directors are required to own M&T common stock equal to two times their annual retainer amount.  assist it in making independence determinations. The Board considers


LOGO


all relevant facts and circumstances in determining whether a material relationship exists with M&T. Material relationships that the Board may consider include commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, industrial, charitable and family relationships. As described below, the NYSE listing standards set forth specific relationships that will automatically bar independence.

NYSE “Bright-Line” Independence Tests. Under the NYSE “bright-line” tests, each of the following relationships will automatically bar a director from being independent:

 

30

A director is employed by M&T or an immediate family member is an executive officer of M&T;

A director’s (or immediate family member’s) receipt of more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from M&T (other than director fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service not contingent upon continued service, and other than compensation received by an immediate family member who is not an executive officer for service as an employee);

A director’s (or immediate family member’s) affiliation or employment with M&T’s internal or external auditors;

A director (or immediate family member) who has been an executive officer of another company where any executive officer of M&T serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or

A director employed by (or an immediate family member is an executive officer of) a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, M&T in an amount in excess of the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

An employee-director of M&T (or a director with an immediate family member who is an M&T executive officer) will not be independent until three years after the employment relationship ends. The other bright-line tests will bar independence if they existed at any time during the prior three years. In addition, a director must be affirmatively determined by our Board to have no material relationship with M&T or its subsidiaries to be considered independent.

In making its determination as to the independence of the directors, the Board considered specific transactions, relationships and arrangements with directors and their immediate family members and any such person’s business affiliations. Additionally, the Board considers ordinary course banking and financial services transactions provided by M&T and its subsidiaries in making its determination as to independence. See the section below titled “Transactions with Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Shareholders” for more information.

The Board, upon the recommendation of the N&G Committee, considered relevant facts and circumstances consistent with the applicable independence standards. Based on its review, the Board affirmatively determined that, other than Mr. Jones, each member of the Board is “independent” and does not have any material relationships with M&T or its subsidiaries.

 

 


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OFLOGO

21


Board Leadership Structure

Chairman. Mr. Jones was elected as M&T’s Chairman of the Board and appointed Chief Executive Officer in December 2017. Mr. Jones has been an employee of M&T for more than 30 years and has been a member of executive management for over 18 years. The Board believes that in light of Mr. Jones’ significant broad-based experience with M&T and his leadership tenure with the organization, his service as Chairman continues to be appropriate for the Board as it fosters effective decision making and clear accountability.

Lead Independent Director. The Board adheres to M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards and annually elects a non-executive Vice Chairman of the Board who performs the duties of lead independent director. Mr. Brady has served as the lead independent director since 2015. As lead independent director, Mr. Brady presides over the executive sessions of the non-management directors. Mr. Brady also currently serves as the Chair of the N&G Committee, which oversees the efforts of M&T and the Board to maintain effective corporate governance practices and Board composition.

Executive Sessions of the Non-Management Directors. The non-management directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. Mr. Brady, Vice Chairman of the Board and the lead independent director, presides at these meetings. In the absence of the lead independent director, the non-management directors determine which director will preside at such meetings.

Board Self-Evaluation Process

The N&G Committee oversees an annual self-evaluation of the Board. Prior to the beginning of the Board’s self-evaluation each year, the N&G Committee considers possible enhancements to the process, including changes to the evaluation format and the written questionnaire. The written questionnaire, which is provided to each director, covers a range of topics related to Board effectiveness and performance, including questions on Board composition, culture, committee performance, risk management, oversight of corporate strategy, management accountability, and agenda and meeting effectiveness.

After completion of the written questionnaire, the full Board, led by the Chair of the N&G Committee, reviews the results and holds a self-evaluation discussion. Any points of attention or changes to Board practices are identified, and the Chair of the N&G Committee has the opportunity to meet with the Chief Legal Officer or others as necessary to discuss any such follow-up items. Later in the year, the lead independent director also leads a discussion on Board effectiveness and solicits further feedback during an executive session of the non-management directors. In addition to this formal Board self-evaluation process, directors are encouraged to provide feedback at any point during the year. Board committees also perform their own self-evaluation process as required in their respective charters.

Board Continuing Education and Orientation

The Board, through discussions with management and requests throughout the year, identifies areas of focus for director education and development. As a result, educational topics are planned throughout the year and presented at meetings of the Board and committees on a regular basis. The presentations are provided by both internal specialists and outside advisors on a range of topics to enhance directors’ knowledge of areas important to their ability to carry out Board and committee responsibilities. Directors are also encouraged to pursue outside learning opportunities and offered membership by M&T in a leading national director education association.

Newly elected directors participate in the company’s director orientation program. The director orientation program aims to acquaint newly elected directors with M&T’s business, culture and governance framework. Members of executive leadership, including heads of business lines and departments, participate in a detailed live orientation session with new directors, reviewing the company’s culture and values, business structure, strategic objectives and planning, risk management matters, corporate governance program, internal audit services and compliance programs, and policies applicable to directors, among other topics.

22

LOGO


Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Risk Committee assists the Board in its oversight of risk management functions. Management has established the Enterprise Risk Framework (“Risk Framework”) through which M&T identifies, assesses, monitors, controls, communicates, and escalates risk in a manner designed to ensure the Risk Committee is provided the transparency necessary to be effective in its oversight responsibilities.

The Risk Framework, which is reviewed and approved by the Risk Committee at least annually, represents M&T’s overall risk management approach, including the policies, processes, controls, and systems, through which the company seeks to manage risk. It provides a common foundation for all employees and officers as well as directors to understand and communicate the types of risks that M&T faces in pursuit of its business objectives.

M&T’s Risk Framework includes the following critical elements:

• The Risk Appetite Statement, which articulates, in written form, the types of risks that M&T BANK CORPORATIONis willing to accept and those that M&T seeks to avoid in pursuit of its business objectives. It affirms the principles by which M&T identifies itself, while providing a central guide for decision making processes.

Corporate Governance Standards

• The Board believes that the purpose“Three Lines of soundDefense” Control Structure, which is intended to clarify roles, responsibilities and accountabilities for decision making, risk taking and control across M&T. The Second and Third Lines of Defense provide independent oversight to help ensure thorough and effective corporateidentification, assessment, monitoring, and mitigation of risks.

• Risk Governance Committee oversight through a multi-tiered structure responsible for overseeing proactive risk identification, developing an aggregated view of risks, and providing a consistent governance methodology across M&T. The Risk Governance Committees are management committees predominately chaired by members of our Independent Risk Management teams, and membership spans employees from all three Lines of Defense. All such committees report up to the Management Risk Committee, which is chaired by the Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”), and serves as the executive level committee responsible for the implementation and oversight of the Risk Framework.

• Clearly defined roles and responsibilities through the establishment of Risk Management policies and procedures.

• Risk Reporting, which provides a sustainable mechanism designed to ensure that shareholder value is maximized in a manner that is consistent with legal requirementsthe Management Risk Committee and the highest standardsRisk Committee are notified of business ethicsall material risks and integrity.  provided an independent assessment of M&T’s activities by the Second Line of Defense.

In addition to the Risk Committee, the Audit Committee plays a key role in risk management oversight through the validation and oversight of our internal controls, policies and procedures to help ensure their effectiveness, as described further below in the description of the Audit Committee. Our C&HC Committee also provides oversight of risks associated with M&T’s compensation programs, as described in more detail under “Incentive Compensation Governance” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement.

At each Board meeting, the Board receives a report from the Chair of the Risk Committee and the CRO. Further, the CRO provides reports directly to the Risk Committee at each of its meetings as well as at least twice per year to the Audit Committee and at least annually to the C&HC Committee. The Board also regularly receives reports from the Chair of the Audit Committee. During 2023, the Risk Committee held 17 meetings, including two joint meetings with the Audit Committee.

LOGO

23


Oversight of Sustainability and ESG Matters

Board Oversight. The Board is committed to effective oversight of sustainability and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters. The Board maintains such oversight through its committee structure.

N&G Committee: The N&G Committee serves as a resource to the Board has consistently adhered toon corporate governance, standards that it believes promotes this purpose.

Annually,sustainability and ESG matters and oversees the Board evaluates,company’s overall sustainability and ESG strategy and policies;

Risk Committee: The Risk Committee is responsible for oversight of M&T’s Risk Framework, which includes the oversight of climate risk;

C&HC Committee: The C&HC Committee reviews M&T’s human capital and talent management strategies, including employee diversity, equity and inclusion, well-being and engagement, and recruitment, development and retention; and

Audit Committee: The Audit Committee discusses key ESG and sustainability-related disclosures, including internal procedures and controls related to such disclosures.

Management Governance Structure. Board oversight is supported by a management governance structure which includes our Sustainability Committee. The Sustainability Committee oversees M&T’s sustainability and ESG management framework, including the strategies, objectives, disclosures, goals and targets, communications, and policies established across the company to identify, measure, monitor, control, respond to, report on, and execute on ESG risks and opportunities. The Sustainability Committee is comprised of key executive leaders and reports to the N&G Committee. In addition, we have established a Sustainability Working Group and Climate Steering Committee comprised of senior leaders from across M&T to provide feedback, guidance and promote alignment and effectiveness of sustainability initiatives and the enterprise-wide climate program, respectively.

Climate risk is integrated into our Risk Framework with oversight from the Risk Committee. The Climate Risk Working Group was established by M&T’s senior-level Operational Risk Committee to aid in the governance and review of oversight of climate risk and is comprised of employees across the company who monitor for climate risks.

M&T provides more information regarding its sustainability and ESG program, priorities and progress in light of best practices and regulatory guidance, its Corporate Governance Standards. The current Corporate Governance Standards are availableannual Sustainability Report, which can be found on M&T’s Investor Relations website at https://ir.mtb.com/corporate-governanceir.mtb.com.These standards address, among other things,

24

LOGO


Board Committees

Board and Committee Membership

(as of March 1, 2024)

Director

AuditCompensation and
Human Capital
ExecutiveNomination
and Governance
Risk

John P. Barnes(1)

Robert T. Brady(2)

Chair

Carlton J. Charles

Jane Chwick(1)

William F. Cruger, Jr.(3)

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

Gary N. Geisel

Chair

Leslie V. Godridge(1)

René F. Jones(4)

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

Melinda R. Rich

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.(1)

ChairChair

Denis J. Salamone(3)

Chair

John R. Scannell

Rudina Seseri

Kirk W. Walters

Herbert L. Washington

(1)

Designated as a “risk management expert” under Regulation YY of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

(2)

Mr. Brady also serves as the non-executive Vice Chairman of the Board who performs the duties of lead independent director.

(3)

Determined to be an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.

(4)

Mr. Jones serves as the Chairman of the Board.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee has the authority and responsibility to engage and discharge the independent registered public accounting firm, pre-approve all audit and non-audit services to be provided by such firm, review the plan and results of the auditing engagement, review management’s evaluation of the adequacy of M&T’s system of internal controls over financial reporting, direct and supervise investigations into matters within the scope of its duties, and perform the duties set forth in its written charter and such other duties as are required by applicable laws or SEC rules. The Audit Committee also approves the compensation of M&T’s Chief Auditor. In addition, the Audit Committee serves as the Examining Committee for M&T Bank and Wilmington Trust, N.A. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Cruger, Cunningham, Salamone (Chair) and Washington, each of whom served on the Committee throughout 2023. The Audit Committee held 14 meetings in 2023, including two joint meetings with the Risk Committee.

The Audit Committee is comprised solely of directors who are not officers or employees of M&T and who the Board has determined have the requisite financial literacy to serve on the Audit Committee. The Board determined that no member of the Audit Committee has any material relationship with M&T that might interfere with the exercise of the member’s independent judgment and that each member meets the standards of independence established by the SEC and the NYSE. In addition, the Board has determined that at least one member of the Audit Committee meets the NYSE standard of having “accounting or related financial management expertise.” The Board, based upon the recommendation of the N&G Committee, after reviewing all relevant facts and circumstances, has determined that Mr. Cruger and Mr. Salamone each is an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.

LOGO

25


The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board. The Audit Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

Compensation and Human Capital (C&HC) Committee

The C&HC Committee, in accordance with its charter, is responsible for discharging the responsibilities of the Board relating to the compensation of M&T’s executive officers as well as administering M&T’s equity compensation plans and awarding grants thereunder. The C&HC Committee is also responsible for oversight of M&T’s human capital and talent management strategies, including strategies related to employee diversity, equity and inclusion, well-being, engagement, recruitment, development and retention.

The C&HC Committee recommends to the Board the compensation and benefits of directors and reviews and approves the compensation and benefits of executive officers of M&T. The C&HC Committee is also responsible for reviewing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) and providing a report recommending to the Board whether such CD&A should be included in the proxy statement.

The members of the C&HC Committee are Mr. Geisel (Chair), Ms. Rich and Mr. Washington, each of whom served on the Committee throughout 2023. The C&HC Committee held seven meetings in 2023, including one joint meeting with the N&G Committee.

The C&HC Committee is comprised solely of directors who are not officers or employees of M&T. The Board determined that no member of the C&HC Committee has any material relationship with M&T that might interfere with the exercise of the member’s independent judgment and that each member meets the standards of independence established by the SEC and the NYSE, including for compensation committees.

The C&HC Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board. The C&HC Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

Executive Committee

The Board has empowered its Executive Committee to act when the Board is not in session, during which time the Executive Committee possesses all of the Board’s powers in the management of the business and affairs of M&T, except as otherwise limited by law. The members of the Executive Committee are Mr. Brady, Mr. Geisel, Mr. Jones, Ms. Rich and Mr. Sadler (Chair), each of whom served on the Committee throughout 2023. The Executive Committee held seven meetings in 2023. The Executive Committee of M&T meets jointly with the Executive Committee of M&T Bank, which includes Messrs. Ledgett and Salamone as rotating members, in addition to Mr. Brady, Mr. Geisel, Mr. Jones, Ms. Rich and Mr. Sadler (Chair).

The Executive Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board. The Executive Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

Nomination and Governance (N&G) Committee

The N&G Committee is responsible for evaluating and overseeing the efforts of M&T and of the Board to maintain effective corporate governance practices and identifying candidates for election to the Board. In addition, the N&G Committee is responsible for reviewing M&T’s strategy and policies relating to sustainability and ESG matters, including engagement with shareholders and other stakeholders.

The members of the N&G Committee are Messrs. Brady (Chair), Charles and Scannell, each of whom served on the Committee in 2023. Mr. Charles joined the N&G Committee upon his election to the Board in January 2023. The N&G Committee held six meetings in 2023, including one joint meeting with the C&HC Committee.

26

LOGO


The N&G Committee considers nominees for director who are recommended by various persons or entities, including, but not limited to, non-management directors, the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of M&T, and shareholders. As explained above under “Board Composition, Diversity and Refreshment,” in evaluating all nominees for director, including those recommended by shareholders, the N&G Committee reviews the qualifications and independence of the potential nominee in light of the composition of the current Board and its various committees. This assessment includes, among other considerations, the potential nominee’s diversity, qualification as independent, skills, experience, tenure, contribution and appropriate geographic balance in the context of the needs of the Board and its committees. The N&G Committee has engaged Ridgeway Partners to assist with identification and evaluation of potential future director nominees.

The N&G Committee will consider candidates nominated by shareholders who are properly submitted in writing to M&T’s Corporate Secretary at One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203 and received no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which M&T first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. For the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, M&T’s Corporate Secretary must receive those nominations no earlier than October 6, 2024 and no later than November 5, 2024.

The N&G Committee is comprised solely of directors who are not officers or employees of M&T. The Board determined that no member of the N&G Committee has any material relationship with M&T that might interfere with the exercise of the member’s independent judgment and that each member meets the standards of independence established by the SEC and the NYSE.

The N&G Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board. The N&G Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

Risk Committee

The Risk Committee assists the Board in its oversight of M&T’s risk management function, including the strategies, policies, procedures and systems established by management to identify, assess, measure and manage the major risks facing M&T. In discharging its duties of risk oversight, the Risk Committee provides input to management on risk appetite, risk profile and regulatory requirements and assesses the effectiveness of M&T’s risk management framework. See “Board’s Role in Risk Oversight” above for more information about the Risk Committee’s role in assisting the Board in its oversight of risk management functions.

The members of the Risk Committee are Mr. Barnes, Ms. Chwick. Ms. Godridge, Mr. Ledgett and Mr. Sadler (Chair), each of whom served on the Committee throughout 2023. The Risk Committee held 17 meetings in 2023, including two joint meetings with the Audit Committee.

Regulation YY promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”), requires that publicly traded bank holding companies such as M&T must maintain a risk committee chaired by an independent director and include at least one member meeting the FRB standards of experience in identifying, assessing and managing risk exposures of large, complex financial firms commensurate with the company’s structure, risk profile complexity, activities and size (a “risk management expert”). The Board, based upon the recommendation of the N&G Committee, after reviewing all relevant facts and circumstances, determined that Mr. Barnes, Ms. Chwick, Ms. Godridge and Mr. Sadler each is a “risk management expert.”

The Risk Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board. The Risk Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

LOGO

27


Board and Committee Attendance

The Board held 10 meetings in 2023. Each director qualificationsattended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board and responsibilities,the total number of meetings held by committees on which the director served. The average attendance of directors at Board and board committees, director compensationcommittee meetings held in 2023 was approximately 96%.

96%

Average attendance of directors at Board and independence, director orientation and continuing education, annual performance evaluations, corporate disclosure policy, controls and procedures regarding financial reporting and disclosure, and codes of business conduct and ethics.committee meetings in 2023

Availability of Corporate Governance Standards

M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards encourage all members of the Board to attend its Annual Meeting of Shareholders, absent exigent circumstances. All directors attended the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which was held virtually.

Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics

M&T makes its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics available to all employees. M&T requires all employees to certify that they have read and are familiar with the employee policies and procedures and their content, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and that they will adhere to such policies and procedures.

M&T’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to our directors, officers, advisors and employees, as well as to our agents and representatives, including consultants. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires that individuals avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws and other legal requirements, conduct business in an honest and ethical manner, and otherwise act with integrity and in the best interests of M&T. In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics expects individuals to report any observed illegal or unethical behavior and provides a retaliation-free reporting mechanism. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is a guide to help ensure that all individuals live up to the highest ethical standards.

M&T also maintains a Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and any other senior financial officers designated by the Chief Financial Officer from time to time. This Code of Ethics supplements our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and is intended to promote honest and ethical conduct, full and accurate financial reporting and compliance with laws, as well as other matters.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers are available on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance. In accordance with SEC rules, M&T will post on its website or file a Form 8-K to report any amendment to or waiver from any provision in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller, or persons performing similar functions.

In addition to being available on M&T’s website at https://ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance, any shareholder can request copies of M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards, the charters for each of the Audit Committee, RiskC&HC Committee, NCGExecutive Committee, N&G Committee or the ExecutiveRisk Committee, as well as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and our Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers. To make a request, shareholders may either mail their request to M&T Bank Corporation, Attention: Shareholder Relations, One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203, or send such request to Shareholder Relations via electronic mail at ir@mtb.com.

Communications with the Board

Any shareholder or other interested party wishing to communicate with the Board or any individual director may submit his or her written correspondence to M&T Bank Corporation’s Corporate

28

LOGO


Secretary, One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203. The Corporate Secretary will provide the communication, or prepare a summary of the communication, to the appropriate member(s) of the Board, unless, in the judgment of the Corporate Secretary, the matter is not intended or appropriate for the Board.

Majority Voting Standard for Director Elections

Pursuant to M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, in an uncontested election when a quorum is represented, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to a director nominee is required for the election of that nominee as a director. If an incumbent director in an uncontested election does not receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, that director would still be elected, but would be required to tender his or her resignation to the Board. The independent members of the Board would then determine whether or not to accept such resignation, taking into account the recommendation of the N&G Committee. The Board will publicly disclose, in a press release or SEC filing, its decision to accept or reject such resignation within 90 days after the certification of the election results.

Compensation and Human Capital Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Mr. Geisel, Ms. Rich and Mr. Washington served as members of the C&HC Committee during 2023, and each currently serves as a member. No individual who served as a member of the C&HC Committee during 2023 was at any time or formerly an officer or employee of M&T or any of its subsidiaries. During 2023, none of M&T’s executive officers served as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the C&HC Committee, and none of M&T’s executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a member of M&T’s Board or on the C&HC Committee.

The Board determined that all members of the C&HC Committee are independent and have no financial or personal relationships with M&T requiring disclosure pursuant to SEC rules (other than director compensation, equity ownership and transactions made in the ordinary course of business with its banking or other operating subsidiaries as described in this proxy statement).

LOGO

29


Director Compensation

The compensation program for our non-employee directors aims to compensate directors in a competitive range compared to peer financial institutions, commensurate with the significant amount of time, effort and expertise required to fulfill director duties. The program also aims to align the interests of our directors with M&T’s shareholders through the award of an annual Board equity retainer.

The director compensation structure provides annual compensation to directors approximately 50 percent in equity and 50 percent in cash (depending upon committee participation) through an annual Board equity retainer and an annual Board cash retainer, as well as annual committee cash retainers for service on Board committees. There are no per meeting fees.

Equity Award. The annual Board equity retainer component is granted in the form of restricted stock units having a grant date fair value of $130,000 for the lead independent director and of $120,000 for each other non-employee director. For 2023, the restricted stock units were awarded in April 2023, vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date, and have such other terms as provided in a Directors’ Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement and under the M&T Bank Corporation 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated (the “2019 Equity Plan”).

Cash Fees. Under the annual Board cash retainer component, a cash retainer of $100,000 is paid to the lead independent director and a cash retainer of $90,000 is paid to each other non-employee director.

Committee Fees. The following annual cash retainers are also paid to the members of the committees of the Board:

An annual cash retainer of $40,000 is paid to the Chair of the Audit Committee, and an annual cash retainer of $20,000 is paid to each other member of the Audit Committee.

An annual cash retainer of $25,000 is paid to the Chair of the C&HC Committee and an annual cash retainer of $15,000 is paid to each other member of the C&HC Committee.

An annual cash retainer of $25,000 is paid to the Chair of the Executive Committee, and an annual cash retainer of $15,000 is paid to each other member of the Executive Committee (including directors who serve on the Executive Committee of M&T’s subsidiary, M&T Bank).

An annual cash retainer of $25,000 is paid to the Chair of the N&G Committee and an annual cash retainer of $15,000 is paid to each other member of the N&G Committee.

An annual cash retainer of $40,000 is paid to the Chair of the Risk Committee and an annual cash retainer of $25,000 is paid to each other member of the Risk Committee.

In addition, directors who also serve as members of M&T Bank’s Trust and Investment Committee are paid an annual cash retainer of $12,000, with the Chair paid an annual cash retainer of $15,000.

The annual Board and committee cash retainers are paid in quarterly installments, with quarterly payments paid in arrears at the beginning of each calendar quarter for service during the prior quarter.

Directors who are salaried officers of M&T or its subsidiaries do not receive any compensation for their service as directors.

30

LOGO


The following table sets forth the compensation of directors (who are not salaried officers of M&T or its subsidiaries) for fiscal year 2023.

2023 Director Compensation Table

Name

  

Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
(1)

($)

   Stock
Awards
(2)(3)
($)
   All Other
Compensation
($)
     

Total

($)

 

John. P. Barnes

   115,000.00    120,013.20   —      235,013.20 

Robert T. Brady

   140,000.00    130,077.20   —      270,077.20 

Carlton J. Charles(4)

   135,000.00    120,013.20   —      255,013.20 

Jane Chwick

   115,000.00    120,013.20   —      235,013.20 

William F. Cruger, Jr.

   110,000.00    120,013.20   —      230,013.20 

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

   110,000.00    124,069.20   —      234,069.20 

Gary N. Geisel

   130,000.00    124,069.20   —      254,069.20 

Leslie V. Godridge

   130,000.00    120,013.20   —      250,013.20 

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

   130,000.00    120,013.20   —      250,013.20 

Melinda R. Rich

   105,000.00    120,013.20   —      225,013.20 

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.

   155,000.00    128,125.20   —      283,125.20 

Denis J. Salamone

   145,000.00    120,013.20   —      265,013.20 

John R. Scannell

   105,000.00    120,013.20   —      225,013.20 

Rudina Seseri

   102,000.00    120,013.20   —      222,013.20 

Kirk. W. Walters

   102,000.00    120,013.20   —      222,013.20 

Herbert L. Washington

   125,000.00    120,013.20   —      245,013.20 

(1)

As described above the table, cash fees are paid in quarterly installments at the beginning of each calendar quarter for service the prior quarter.

(2)

The amounts in this column include the annual Board equity retainer granted in April 2023 under the compensation program for our non-employee directors, as described on the prior page. The annual Board equity retainer was granted under the 2019 Equity Plan and vests upon the one-year anniversary of the votes cast with respectgrant date. The grant date fair value of the annual Board equity retainer is based on the closing price of M&T common stock on the NYSE as of the grant date. Grants to such director nominee is requireddirectors for the election of that nominee as a director.  If an incumbent director in an uncontested election does not receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director, that director would still be elected, but would be required to tender his or her resignation to the Board.  The independent members of theannual Board will then determine whether or not to accept such resignation, taking into account the recommendation of the NCG Committee.  The Board will publicly disclose, in a press release or SEC filing, its decision to accept or reject such resignation within 90 days after the certification of the election results.

Codes of Ethics

M&T makes its policies and procedures available to all of our employees.  These policies include our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.  Further, M&T requires all employees to annually certify that they have read andequity retainer are familiar with the employee policies and procedures and their content, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and that they will adhere to such policies and procedures.

M&T’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to our directors, officers, advisors and employees, as well as to our agents and representatives, including consultants.  Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires that individuals avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws and other legal requirements, conduct business in an honest and ethical manner, and otherwise act with integrity

31


and in the best interests of M&T.  In addition, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics expects individuals to report any observed illegal or unethical behavior and provides a retaliation-free reporting mechanism.  Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is a guide to help ensure that all individuals liverounded up to the highest ethical standards.next whole share.

(3)

For each of Messrs. Cunningham, Geisel and Sadler, the amount listed in this column also includes the grant date fair value of an annual equity award paid for such director’s service on an M&T also maintainsBank Regional Directors Advisory Council (each, a Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and all other senior financial officers designated by“DAC Award”), which is granted under the Chief Financial Officer from time to time.  This Code of Ethics supplements our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics2019 Equity Plan and is intended to promote honest and ethical conduct, full and accurate financial reporting and compliance with laws,vested upon grant. The grant date fair value of each annual DAC Award granted in 2023 as well as other matters.

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers is available on M&T’s website at https://ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

In accordance with SEC rules, M&T will post on its website or file a Form 8-K to report any amendment to or waiver from any provisionincluded in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller, or persons performing similar functions.

Board Size

We are asking our shareholders to votecolumn is based on the election of 19 director nominees. The Board regularly evaluates its size and structure and believes that its current makeup is appropriate to best serve the needsclosing price of M&T and the interests of our shareholders.  As a financial institution, M&T faces considerable and changing regulatory, risk management and economic demands that require a substantial commitmentcommon stock on the partNYSE as of our directors.   The size of our Boardthe grant date and is advantageous in allowingas follows for an appropriate number of memberseach director: (i) $4,065 for Mr. Cunningham; (ii) $4,065 for Mr. Geisel; and (iii) $8,112 for Mr. Sadler.

(4)

Mr. Charles was elected to be designated to each committee in order to provide proper and effective oversight.  The diversity of viewpoints on the Board and each committee also allowsin January 2023. For service in the first quarter of 2023, in addition to his quarterly cash retainer payment for an effective check and balance on proposals from management and directors.  In addition,such period, Mr. Charles received $30,000 in cash fees reflecting the number of independent directors aids in maintaining the requisite independence standardsprorated value of the Board’s various committees.equity retainer for such period.

M&T Bank Regional Directors Advisory Council Fees

As reflected in the 2023 Director Compensation Table above, Messrs. Cunningham, Geisel and Sadler also received an annual equity award in 2023 for their service on an M&T Bank Regional Directors Advisory Council (“DAC”). During 2023, Mr. Cunningham served as Chairman of the DAC of the Hudson Valley Division of M&T Bank; Mr. Geisel served as Chairman of the DAC of the Baltimore-Washington Division of M&T Bank; and Mr. Sadler served as Chairman of the DAC of the Florida Division of M&T Bank. The annual equity award for DAC service is granted under the 2019 Equity Plan and is vested upon grant. The value of each equity award is described in the 2023 Director Compensation Table above.

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Under M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards, each director is expected to own shares of M&T common stock, which includes all beneficially owned shares and unvested restricted stock units, with a value equal to at least five times the amount of the director’s annual cash retainer. Each director is expected to meet this ownership guideline by the fifth anniversary of his or her initial election to the Board. Directors who receive no personal compensation for their service are not subject to this guideline. All directors are in compliance with the director stock ownership guidelines (as of February 14, 2024).

Board CompositionLOGO

31


Stock Ownership Information

The tables below set forth direct and indirect ownership of common stock (and in the case of Mr. Walters, ownership of a series of preferred stock as described) by each of our directors, each of the NEOs, all directors and executive officers as a group, and by each person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of such securities as of February 14, 2024. The tables also show the percentage of total shares outstanding of common stock and preferred stock, as applicable, represented by such ownership as of February 14, 2024.

For purposes of these tables, beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the provisions of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) where, in general, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if such person has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security or the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of the security, or if such person has the right to acquire the beneficial ownership of the security within 60 days.

Directors and Named Executive Officers Stock Ownership

Name of Beneficial Owner

Number of SharesPercentage of Class

John P. Barnes

329,133(1)(2)*

Robert T. Brady

21,545(3)*

Carlton J. Charles

954*

Jane Chwick

4,540*

William F. Cruger, Jr.

7,401*

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

25,212(4)*

Gary N. Geisel

19,652*

Leslie V. Godridge

2,649*

René F. Jones

217,911(2)(5)(6)*

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

4,758*

Melinda R. Rich

20,631*

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.

100,707(7)*

Denis J. Salamone

77,084(8)*

John R. Scannell

4,393*

Rudina Seseri

1,736*

Kirk W. Walters

110,319(2)(6)(9)*
40,000(10)*

Herbert L. Washington

16,345(11)*

Daryl N. Bible

15,000*

Christopher E. Kay

16,218(2)*

Darren J. King

101,122(2)(6)(12)*

Doris P. Meister

33,987(2)(6)*

Kevin J. Pearson

124,497(2)(6)(13)*

Current directors and Diversity

M&T strives to foster an inclusive workplace where we respect and value individual differences.  We believe that employee diversity enhances the organization’s ability to succeed at all levels.  Likewise, M&T values diversity among its Board members.  Our Corporate Governance Standards provide that the NCG Committee, in discharging its duties to review director nominee qualifications, consider experience, skill set and diversity in the context of Board needs and obligations.  In light of these guidelines, the NCG Committee endeavors to identify nominees that possess diverse educational backgrounds, business experiences, life skills, geographic representation and community involvement.  The NCG Committee does not assign specific weight to any particular criteria—the goal is to identify nominees that, consideredexecutive officers as a group will possess the talents, skill sets(29 persons)

common stock ownership

1,370,747

(2)(6)

*

Current directors and characteristics necessary for the Board to fulfill its responsibilities.  The Board also considers the availability of each nominee to fulfill his or her responsibilitiesexecutive officers as a director, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide specifically that the Board should review any director’s availability to fulfill hisgroup (29 persons) Series H

Perpetual Non-Cumulative Preferred stock ownership

40,000

*

Represents shares of common stock, except as indicated in footnote 10 for Mr. Walters.

*

Less than 1% of class of shares (i.e., of outstanding common stock or her responsibility if a director serves on more than three other pubic company boards.preferred stock, as applicable)

32

 

In identifyingLOGO


(1)

Includes 1,558 shares held by the Nancy Barnes Living Trust and recommending nominees, our Board believes that is composition should also reflect gender, racial, sexual orientation, national origin and ethnic diversity.  In 2020,69,960 shares held by the Board elected three new directors, including two women and one person of color.  This year, over 42% of our director nominees represent diverse constituencies, including four women, three people of color and one person from the LGBTQ community, an increase from 29% of the nominees at the 2020 Annual Meeting.  The

32

John P. Barnes Living Trust.

(2)


Board also believes it is desirableIncludes shares subject to maintain a mixoptions granted under (a) M&T ‘s incentive compensation plans, and (b) plans of experienced, longer-tenured directors who possess deep institutional knowledge along with newer directors who have different expertise, backgrounds and fresh perspectives.  The director nominees range in age from 43 to 81, and the average age is 66.  Over 47% of the director nominees have served on the Board for five years or less.  

Board Independence

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Standards, the Board conducts an annual review of director independence.  As a result of the review performed in February 2020, the Board determined, based upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, that 14 of the 17 director nominees then standing for election at the 2020 Annual Meeting met the NYSE standards for independence.  In February 2021, the Board conducted its annual director independence review and, based upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, determined that of the 19 nominees standing for election as directors at the Annual Meeting, all of whom are currently serving as such, 16 meet the NYSE standards for independence.  Currently, only Messrs. Jones, Gold and Pearson are not deemed to be independent.  

The Board applies the standards of the SEC, NYSE and M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards to assist it in making independence determinations.  The Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances in determining whether a material relationship exists with M&T.  Material relationships that the Board may consider include commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, industrial, charitable and family relationships.  As described below, the NYSE rules set forth specific relationships that will automatically bar independence.  

NYSE “Bright-Line” Independence Tests.  Under the NYSE “bright-line” tests, each of the following relationships will automatically bar a director from being independent:  

A director is employedcompanies acquired by M&T, or an immediate family member is an executive officerthe obligations of M&T;

A director’s (or immediate family member’s) receipt of more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from M&T (other than director fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service not contingent upon continued service);

A director’s (or immediate family member’s) affiliation or employment with M&T’s internal or external auditors;

A director (or immediate family member) who haswhich have been an executive officer of another company where any executive officer of M&T serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or

A director employed by (or an immediate family member is an executive officer of) a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, M&T in an amount in excess of the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

An employee-director of M&T (or a director with an immediate family member who is an M&T executive officer) will not be independent until three years after the employment relationship ends.  The other bright-line tests will bar independence if they existed at any time during the prior three years.  

In making its determination as to the independence of the directors, the Board considered specific transactions, relationships and arrangements with directors and their immediate family members and any such person’s business affiliations.  For Ms. Rich, the Board considered payments by M&T to a travel agency with which she is affiliated for services in an amount that did not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the company’s consolidated gross revenues (and, for purposes of a leading proxy advisory firm’s standard, also did not exceed 1% of M&T’s or the company’s consolidated gross revenues).  The Board determined that Ms. Rich did not have a direct or indirect material interest in the transactions with the

33


entities that M&T engaged for professional and transactional services.  Additionally, the Board considers ordinary course banking and financial services transactions providedassumed by M&T and its subsidiaries as generally described in the section titled “Transactions with Directors and Executive Officers,” in making its determination asconverted into options to independence.

With respect to the independence determination for Mr. Salamone, Mr. Salamone served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hudson City from September 2014 until the completion of the acquisition of Hudson City by M&T in November 2015.  Mr. Salamone was named Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hudson City in September 2014, during the period in which the merger between Hudson City and M&T awaited regulatory approval and following the unexpected death of Hudson City’s prior Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.  As provided for in the merger agreement with Hudson City, concurrent with the consummation of the merger, Mr. Salamone’s status as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hudson City ended and he joined the Boardreceive shares of M&T as a non-employee Director.  Never having been employed by M&T and receiving no remuneration as such,common stock, all of which are currently exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days after February 14, 2024: Mr. Salamone is independent under SEC and NYSE rules, and Mr. Salamone, upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, was determined by the Board to be “independent.”  In previous years, as a result of a leading proxy advisory firm’s five-year independence lookback standard for former officers of acquired companies, Mr. Salamone was viewed as an “insider” on the Audit Committee, which resulted in an adverse voting recommendation from the proxy advisory firm.  Because the fifth anniversary of the merger with Hudson City has passed, we expect Mr. Salamone also to be viewed as “independent” by proxy advisory firms.  Mr. Salamone continues to bring valuable public accounting, banking and other experience to the Audit Committee.    

The Board, upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, considered all relevant facts and circumstances, including the relationships described above, consistent with the applicable independence standards and determined that none impair the relevant director’s independence as a director of M&T or as a member of any of the committees on which he or she serves.  Based on its review of all relevant information, the Board affirmatively determined that, other than Messrs. Jones, Gold and Pearson, each member of the Board is “independent” and does not have any material relationships with M&T or its subsidiaries.

Board Leadership Structure

Chairman and Lead Independent Director

Barnes – 221,722 shares; Mr. Jones was elected as M&T’s Chairman of the Board– 120,960 shares; Mr. Walters – 69,165 shares; Mr. Kay – 5,818 shares; Mr. King – 41,080 shares; Ms. Meister – 25,538 shares; Mr. Pearson – 67,414 shares; and appointed Chief Executive Officer in December 2017.  Mr. Jones has been an employee of M&T for 29 years and has been a member of executive management for over 15 years.  The Board believes that in light of Mr. Jones’ significant broad-based experience with M&T and his leadership tenure with the organization, his service as Chairman continues to be appropriate for the Board as it fosters effective decision-making and clear accountability.  The Board adheres to the Corporate Governance Standards on this topic and annually elects a non-executive Vice Chairman of the Board who performs the duties of lead independent director.  Mr. Brady has served as the lead independent director since June 2015.  The lead independent director presides over the executive sessions of the non-management directors.

Executive Sessions of the Non-Management Directors

The non-management directors meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.  Mr. Brady, Vice Chairman of the Board and the lead independent director, presides at these meetings.  In the absence of the lead independent director, the non-management directors determine which director will preside at such meetings.

34


Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Risk Committee assists the Board in its oversight of risk management functions. Management has established the Enterprise Risk Framework (“Framework”) through which M&T identifies, assesses, monitors, controls, communicates, and escalates risk in a manner that ensures the Risk Committee is provided the transparency necessary to be effective in its oversight responsibilities.  

The Framework, which is reviewed and approved by the Risk Committee at least annually, represents M&T’s overall risk management approach, including the policies, processes, controls, and systems, through which risk is managed.  It provides a common method for all employees and officers as well as directors to understand and communicate the types of risk that M&T faces in pursuit of its business objectives. The Framework includes the following critical elements:

The Risk Appetite Statement articulates, in written form, the types of risks that M&T is willing to accept and those that M&T seeks to avoid in pursuit of its business objectives.  It affirms the principles by which M&T identifies itself, while providing a central guide for decision making processes.

The “Three Lines Model” Control Structure, intended to clarify roles, responsibilities and accountabilities for decision making, risk taking and control across M&T.  The first line, consisting primarily of M&T’s business units, has fundamental responsibilities related to identifying, controlling, monitoring and reporting risk. The second line, comprising M&T’s risk oversight function, and third line, comprising M&T’s internal audit function, provide independent oversight and challenge to ensure thorough and effective identification, assessment, monitoring, and mitigation of risks.

Risk Governance Committee oversight through a multitiered structure responsible for overseeing proactive risk identification, developing an aggregated view of risks, and providing a consistent governance methodology across M&T.  The Risk Governance Committees are predominately chaired by members of Independent Risk Management, and membership spans employees from all three lines.  All such committees report to the Management Risk Committee (“MRC”), which is chaired by the Chief Risk Officer, and serves as the executive level committee responsible for the implementation and oversight of the Framework.

Clearly defined roles and responsibilities through the establishment of Risk Management policies and procedures.

Risk Reporting, which provides a sustainable mechanism to ensure that the MRC and Risk Committee are notified of all material risks and provided an independent assessment of M&T’s activities by the second line.

In addition to the Risk Committee, the Audit Committee plays a key role in risk management oversight through the validation and oversight of our internal controls, policies and procedures to ensure their effectiveness, as described further below in the description of the Audit Committee.  Our NCG Committee also provides oversight of risks associated with M&T’s compensation programs, as described in more detail under “Incentive Compensation Governance” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section.

At each Board meeting, the Board receives a report from the Chairperson of the Risk Committee and the Chief Risk Officer.  Further, M&T’s Chief Risk Officer provides regular reports directly to the Risk Committee at each of its meetings as well as twice per year to the Audit Committee and at least annually to the NCG Committee.  The Board also regularly receives reports from the Chairperson of the Audit Committee.  During 2020, the Audit Committee and the Risk Committee held two joint meetings.

35


Board Attendance

The Board held eleven meetings in 2020.  Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and each committee on which the director served.�� The average attendance of directors at Board and committee meetings held in 2020 was approximately 97%.

M&T’s Corporate Governance Standards encourage all members of the Board to attend its Annual Meeting of Shareholders, absent exigent circumstances.  Of the nominees standing for election at this year’s Annual Meeting plus Mr. Hawke, who is not standing for reelection, 17 directors were elected at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 16 of those directors attended that meeting.

Communications with the Board

Any shareholder or other interested party wishing to communicate with the Board or any individual director may submit his or her written correspondence to M&T Bank Corporation’s Corporate Secretary, One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203.  The Corporate Secretary may facilitate direct communications to the Board, the lead independent director, the non-management directors as a group, or individual directors, by reviewing and summarizing such communications.

Below is the current membership of our Board committees.

Board Committees and Member Composition

Committee Member

Audit

(5 members)

Executive

(4 members)

Nomination,

Compensation

and Governance

(4 members)

Risk

(4 members)

C. Angela Bontempo

Chair, Financial Expert

Robert T. Brady*

Calvin G. Butler, Jr.

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

Risk Management Expert

Gary N. Geisel

Chair

Risk Management Expert

Richard S. Gold

Leslie V. Godridge

Richard A. Grossi

Financial Expert

John D. Hawke, Jr.**

Chair

René F. Jones***

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

Newton P.S. Merrill

Kevin J. Pearson

Melinda R. Rich

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.

Chair

Denis J. Salamone

Financial Expert

John R. Scannell

David S. Scharfstein

Rudina Seseri

Herbert L. Washington

*     Mr. Brady also serves as the non-executive Vice Chairman of the Board who performs the duties of lead independent director.

**   Mr. Hawke is not standing for election at the Annual Meeting and his term will end at the Annual Meeting.

*** Mr. Jones serves as Chairman of the Board.


36


Audit Committee

The Audit Committee has the authority and responsibility to engage and discharge the independent registered public accounting firm, pre-approve all audit and non-audit services to be provided by such firm, review the plan and results of the auditing engagement, review management’s evaluation of the adequacy of M&T’s system of internal controls over financial reporting, direct and supervise investigations into matters within the scope of its duties, and perform the duties set forth in its written charter and such other duties as are required by applicable laws or securities exchange rules.  In addition, the Audit Committee serves as the Examining Committee for Wilmington Trust, N.A. and meets jointly with the Examining Committee of M&T Bank.  Ms. Bontempo (Chair) and Messrs. Grossi, Salamone, Scharfstein and Washington served as members of the Audit Committee during 2020, and each currently serves as a member.  The Audit Committee held six meetings in 2020, including two joint meetings with the Risk Committee.

The Audit Committee is comprised solely of directors who are not officers or employees of M&T and who the Board has determined have the requisite financial literacy to serve on the Audit Committee.  The Board determined that no member of the Audit Committee has any material relationship with M&T that might interfere with the exercise of the member’s independent judgment and that each member meets the standards of independence established by the SEC and the NYSE.  In addition, the Board has determined that at least one member of the Audit Committee meets the NYSE standard of having “accounting or related financial management expertise.”  The Board, based upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, after reviewing all relevant facts and circumstances, determined that Ms. Bontempo, Mr. Grossi and Mr. Salamone each is an “audit committee financial expert.”  

The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board.  The Audit Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at https://ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

Executive Committee

The Board has empowered its Executive Committee to act when the Board is not in session, during which time the Executive Committee possesses all of the Board’s powers in the management of the business and affairs of M&T, except as otherwise limited by law.  Messrs. Sadler (Chairman), Brady, Geisel and Jones served as members of the Executive Committee during 2020, and each currently serves as a member.  Mr. Geisel was appointed to the Executive Committee in April 2020.  The Executive Committee held seven meetings in 2020.  The Executive Committee of M&T meets jointly with the Executive Committee of M&T Bank, which in 2020, in addition to Messrs. Sadler, Brady, Geisel and Jones, included Messrs. Ledgett and Salamone as rotating members.

The Executive Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board.  The Executive Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at https://ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee

The NCG Committee is responsible for evaluating the efforts of M&T and of the Board to maintain effective corporate governance practices and identifying candidates for election to the Board.  In addition, the NCG Committee is responsible for administering M&T’s equity compensation plans and awarding grants thereunder, including under the Directors’ Stock Plan and the 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan.

37


The NCG Committee, in accordance with its charter, recommends to the Board the remuneration and benefits of directors and reviews and approves the renumeration and benefits of executive officers of M&T.  The NCG Committee is also responsible for reviewing with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) and providing a report recommending to the Board whether such CD&A should be included in the proxy statement.  Ms. Rich and Messrs. Geisel (Chairman), Brady and Scannell served as members of the NCG Committee during 2020, and each currently serves as a member.  Ms. Rich was appointed to the NCG Committee in June 2020.  The NCG Committee held eleven meetings in 2020.

The NCG Committee considers nominees for director who are recommended by various persons or entities, including, but not limited to, non-management directors, the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of M&T, and shareholders.  In evaluating all nominees for director, including those recommended by shareholders, the NCG Committee considers whether each nominee has all the requisite experience, attributes and qualifications for board membership and not just certain specific qualities or skills.  In addition, the NCG Committee takes into account any contractual rights that persons or entities have with respect to nominees for director.  Since 2019, the NCG Committee has engaged Ridgeway Partners to assist with identification and evaluation of potential future director nominees.  In 2020, the Board, upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, elected three new directors, Mses. Godridge and Seseri and Mr. Butler, each of whom were reviewed as director candidates and recommended as potential directors by various M&T directors, the Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers and Ridgeway Partners.  

In considering nominees for director, including those recommended by shareholders, the NCG Committee reviews the qualifications and independence of the potential nominee in light of the composition of the current Board and its various committees.  This assessment includes, among other considerations, the potential nominee’s qualification as independent, diversity, age, skills, experience, tenure, contribution and appropriate geographic balance in the context of the needs of the Board and its committees.  

The NCG Committee will consider candidates nominated by shareholders that are properly submitted in writing to M&T’s Corporate Secretary at One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203 and received no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which M&T first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders.  For the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, M&T’s Corporate Secretary must receive those nominations no earlier than October 9, 2021 and no later than November 8, 2021.

The NCG Committee is comprised solely of directors who are not officers or employees of M&T.  The Board determined that no member of the NCG Committee has any material relationship with M&T that might interfere with the exercise of the member’s independent judgment and that each member meets the standards of independence established by the SEC and the NYSE.

The NCG Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board.  The NCG Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at https://ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

Risk Committee

The Risk Committee assists the Board in its oversight of M&T’s risk management function, including the strategies, policies, procedures and systems established by management to identify, assess, measure and manage the major risks facing M&T.  In discharging its duties of risk oversight, the Risk Committee provides input to management on risk appetite, risk profile and regulatory requirements and

38


approves the effectiveness of M&T’s risk management framework.  Messrs. Hawke (Chairman), Cunningham, Geisel and Ledgett served as members of the Risk Committee during 2020, and each currently serves as a member.  The Risk Committee held 16 meetings in 2020, including two joint meetings with the Audit Committee.  See “Board’s Role in Risk Oversight” above for more information about the Risk Committee’s role in assisting the Board in its oversight of risk management functions.

Regulation YY promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board (“FRB”) in 2014, requires that publicly traded bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more must maintain a risk committee chaired by an independent director and include at least one member meeting the FRB standards of experience in identifying, assessing and managing risk exposures of large, complex financial firms commensurate with the company’s structure, risk profile complexity, activities and size (a “risk management expert”).  The Board, based upon the recommendation of the NCG Committee, after reviewing all relevant facts and circumstances, determined that Messrs. Cunningham and Geisel each is a “risk management expert.”  

The Risk Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board.  The Risk Committee Charter is available on M&T’s website at https://ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.

NOMINATION, COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

Ms. Rich and Messrs. Brady, Geisel and Scannell served as members of the NCG Committee during 2020, and each currently serves as a member.  No individual who served as a member of the NCG Committee during 2020 was at any time or formerly an officer or employee of M&T or any of its subsidiaries.  During 2020, an executive officer of M&T (who served as an executive officer of M&T until June 2020) served as a director of Moog Inc. where Mr. Scannell, a member of the NCG Committee, is an executive officer.  

The Board determined that all members of the NCG Committee are independent and have no financial or personal relationships with M&T requiring disclosure pursuant to the SEC rules (other than director compensation, equity ownership and transactions made in the ordinary course of business with its banking or other operating subsidiaries as described in this proxy statement).

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

The tables below set forth direct and indirect ownership of common stock by each of our directors, each of the named executive officers, all directors and executive officers as a group – 616,206 shares. Out-of-the-money options are included in the shares presented as beneficially owned to the extent they are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after February 14, 2024.

(3)

Includes 8,000 shares held by a charitable remainder annuity trust of which Mr. Brady and his spouse are co-trustees and of which Mr. Brady’s spouse is the current annuity beneficiary for the lesser of her life or 21 years.

(4)

Includes 11,619 shares held through client accounts at Magnolia Capital Management, Ltd., a registered investment advisory firm of which Mr. Cunningham is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and over which shares he has dispositive and voting powers. Mr. Cunningham has no pecuniary interest in such shares.

(5)

Includes 1,360.3 shares held indirectly as custodian for Mr. Jones’ children.

(6)

Includes shares through participation in the M&T Bank Corporation Retirement Savings Plan: Mr. Jones – 5,709 shares; Mr. Walters – 8 shares; Mr. King – 1,230 shares; Ms. Meister – 1,175 shares; Mr. Pearson – 3,283 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group – 14,648 shares. Such individuals retain voting and investment power over their respective shares in the M&T Bank Corporation Retirement Savings Plan.

(7)

Includes 19,398 shares owned by each person whothe Sadler Family Foundation, a charitable foundation formed by Mr. Sadler. Mr. Sadler is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of M&T’s common stock as of February 25, 2021 together with the percentage of total shares outstanding represented by such ownership based upon 128,634,289 shares outstanding as of February 25, 2021.

For purposes of these tables, beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the provisions of Rule 13d-3a trustee of the Securities Exchange ActSadler Family Foundation and holds voting and dispositive power over the shares owned by it. Also includes 32,831 shares owned by a close relative of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) where,Mr. Sadler.

(8)

Includes 25,000 shares held in general, a persongrantor retained annuity trust of which Mr. Salamone is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if such person has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security or the power to dispose or to direct the disposition of the security, or if such person has the right to acquire thetrustee. Mr. Salamone disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the security within 60 days.extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(9)


Includes 4,688 shares owned by Lacey & Sadie, LLC and 30,091 shares owned by Gus & Bonnie, LLC.

(10)

Shares of Perpetual Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series H, par value $1.00 per share, owned by Gus & Bonnie, LLC.

(11)

Includes 500 shares owned by a close relative of Mr. Washington.

(12)

Includes 1,450 shares held indirectly as custodian for Mr. King’s son and 2,900 shares held by close relatives of Mr. King.

(13)

Includes 5,788 shares held in a grantor retained annuity trust of which Mr. Pearson is the trustee. Mr. Pearson disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all persons or groups known by M&T to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of its outstanding common stock as of February 14, 2024.

Beneficial Owners Holding More Than 5% of M&T Bank Corporation’s Common Stock

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
Percentage
of Class

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

19,433,884(1)11.71%

Wellington Management Group LLP

280 Congress Street

Boston, MA 02210

13,341,040(2)8.04%

BlackRock, Inc.

50 Hudson Yards

New York, NY 10001

13,109,596(3)7.90%

State Street Corporation

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

9,151,943(4)5.51%

 

39


Directors and Named Executive Officers Stock Ownership

Name of Beneficial Owner

Number of Shares

Percentage of Class

C. Angela Bontempo

14,816

(1)

*

Robert T. Brady

18,736

(2)

*

Calvin G. Butler, Jr.

360

*

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

24,207

(3)

*

Gary N. Geisel

22,453

*

Leslie V. Godridge

83

*

Richard S. Gold

71,223

(4)(5)

*

Richard A. Grossi

3,792

(6)

*

John D. Hawke, Jr.

6,523

*

René F. Jones

116,397

(5)(7)(8)

*

Richard H. Ledgett, Jr.

1,705

*

Newton P.S. Merrill

3,068

*

Kevin J. Pearson

74,310

(5)(8)(9)

*

Melinda R. Rich

16,699

*

Robert E. Sadler, Jr.

99,414

(10)

*

Denis J. Salamone

88,511

(11)

*

John R. Scannell

1,817

*

David S. Scharfstein

2,231

*

Rudina Seseri

0

*

Herbert L. Washington

13,741

(12)

*

Darren J. King

64,923

(5)(8)(13)

*

Doris P. Meister

17,821

(5)

*

Current directors and executive officers as a group (31 persons)

829,975

(5)(8)

*

*(1)Lessthan 1%

(1)

Includes 400 shares held by trusts for which Ms. Bontempo is a trustee and in which she has a pecuniary interest and investment power.

(2)

Includes 8,000 shares held by a charitable remainder annuity trust of which Mr. Brady and his spouse are co-trustees and of which Mr. Brady’s spouse is the current annuity beneficiary for the lesser of her life or 21 years.

(3)

Includes 11,875 shares held through client accounts at Magnolia Capital Management, Ltd., a registered investment advisory firm of which Mr. Cunningham is the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and over which shares he has dispositive and voting powers.  Mr. Cunningham has no pecuniary interest in such shares.

(4)

Includes 2.355 shares held jointly with a close relative of Mr. Gold.  

(5)

Includes the following shares subject to options granted under (a) M&T’s incentive compensation plans, and (b) plans of companies acquired by M&T, the obligations of which have been assumed by M&T and converted into options to receive shares of M&T common stock, all of which are currently exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days after February 25, 2021:  Mr. Gold – 23,870 shares; Mr. Jones – 41,760 shares; Mr. King – 14,984 shares; Ms. Meister – 14,575 shares; Mr. Pearson – 25,106 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group – 175,561 shares.  Out-of-the-money options are included in the shares presented as beneficially owned to the extent they are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after February 25, 2021.  

(6)

Jointly owned by a close relative of Mr. Grossi.

(7)

Includes 2.100 shares held indirectly as custodian for Mr. Jones’ children.

(8)

Includes the following shares through participation in the M&T Bank Corporation Retirement Savings Plan:  Mr. Jones – 5,167 shares; Mr. King – 829 shares; Mr. Pearson – 2,971 shares; and all directors and executive officers as a group – 21,774 shares.  Such individuals retain voting and investment power over their respective shares in the Retirement Savings Plan.

(9)

Includes 9,500 shares held in a grantor retained annuity trust of which Mr. Pearson is the trustee.  Mr. Pearson disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(10)

Includes 20,706 shares owned by the Sadler Family Foundation, a charitable foundation formed by Mr. Sadler.  Mr. Sadler is a trustee of the Sadler Family Foundation and holds voting and dispositive power over the shares owned by it. Also includes 32,993 shares owned by a close relative of Mr. Sadler and 6,407 shares held in a grantor retained annuity trust of which Mr. Sadler is the trustee and his descendants are beneficiaries.  Mr. Sadler disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(11)

Includes 5,000 shares owned by the Salamone Family Foundation, a non-profit corporation formed by Mr. Salamone.  Mr. Salamone is a trustee of the Salamone Family Foundation and holds voting and dispositive power over the shares owned by it.  Also includes 20,000 shares held in a grantor retained annuity trust of which Mr. Salamone is the trustee.  Mr. Salamone disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(12)

Includes 500 shares owned by a close relative of Mr. Washington.

(13)

Includes 1,778 shares held indirectly as custodian for Mr. King’s children and 889 shares held by a close relative of Mr. King.

40


The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all persons or groups known by M&T to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of its outstanding common stock as of February 25, 2021.

Beneficial Owners Holding More Than 5% of M&T Bank Corporation’s Common Stock

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership

Percentage of

Class

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355

13,577,933(1)

10.58%

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

10,514,714(2)

8.19%

FMR LLC

245 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02210

10,405,667(3)

8.11%

State Street Corporation

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

6,945,463(4)

5.41%

(1)

The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) filed an amended Schedule 13G with the SEC on February 10, 2021 reporting that it is deemed to be the beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of M&T common stock.  Vanguard reported that it has  shared voting power with respect to 207,300 of the indicated shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 13,009,039 of the indicated shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 568,894 of the indicated shares.

(2)

BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) filed an amended Schedule 13G with the SEC on January 29, 2021 reporting that it is deemed to be the beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of M&T common stock. BlackRock reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 8,662,702 of the indicated shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all 10,514,714 of the indicated shares, which includes shares beneficially owned by certain subsidiaries of BlackRock.

(3)    FMR LLC (“FMR”) filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC on February 8, 202113, 2024, reporting that it is deemed to be the beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of M&T common stock.  FMRstock as of December 31, 2023. Vanguard reported that it has soleshared voting power with respect to 842,831217,569 of the indicated shares, and sole dispositive power with respect to all 10,405,66718,693,530 of the indicated shares which includes shares beneficially owned by certain subsidiariesand shared dispositive power with respect to 740,354 of FMR.the indicated shares.

(2)

(4)    State Street CorporationWellington Management Group LLP (“State Street”Wellington Management”) filed aan amended Schedule 13G with the SEC on February 10, 20219, 2024, reporting that it is deemed to be the beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of M&T common stock.stock as of December 31, 2023. Wellington Management reported that it has shared voting power with respect to 12,356,467 of the indicated shares and shared dispositive power with respect to all 13,341,040 of the indicated shares, which includes shares beneficially owned by certain subsidiaries of Wellington Management.

(3)

BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) filed an amended Schedule 13G with the SEC on January 26, 2024, reporting that it is deemed to be the beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of M&T common stock as of December 31, 2023. BlackRock reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 11,930,479 of the indicated shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all 13,109,596 of the indicated shares, which includes shares beneficially owned by certain subsidiaries of BlackRock.

(4)

State Street Corporation (“State Street”) filed an amended Schedule 13G with the SEC on January 29, 2024, reporting that it is deemed to be the beneficial owner of in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of M&T common stock as of December 31, 2023. State Street reported that it has shared voting power with respect to 6,340,7721,379,317 of the indicated shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 6,932,2529,141,128 of the indicated shares, which includes shares beneficially owned by certain subsidiaries of State Street.

M&T is the sponsor of a number of employee benefit plans that hold an aggregate of 3,123,553 shares of M&T common stock as of February 25, 2021.  Its principal banking subsidiary, M&T Bank, has sole voting authority over 875,423 of these shares.  The remaining 2,248,130 shares of M&T common stock are voted by the trustee of the applicable employee benefit plan pursuant to the instructions of the participants in accordance with the terms of each such plan.  Certain of the directors and executive officers of M&T hold indirect beneficial interests in the holdings of these employee benefit plans.  See also footnotes (5) and (8) to the table set forth above titled “Directors and Named Executive Officers Stock Ownership.”

LOGO

33


M&T is the sponsor of a number of employee benefit plans that hold an aggregate of 3,583,977 shares of M&T common stock as of February 14, 2024. Its principal banking subsidiary, M&T Bank, has sole voting authority over 815,423 of these shares. The remaining 2,768,554 shares of M&T common stock are voted by the trustee of the applicable employee benefit plan pursuant to the instructions of the participants in accordance with the terms of each such plan. Certain of the directors and executive officers of M&T hold indirect beneficial interests in the holdings of these employee benefit plans. See also footnote 6 to the table set forth above titled “Directors and Named Executive Officers Stock Ownership.”

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Pursuant to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, M&T’s directors and certain officers, as well as persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the outstanding shares of M&T’s common stock, are required to file reports regarding their initial M&T stock ownership and subsequent changes to their ownership with the SEC. Based solely on a review of the reports filed for fiscal year 2023 and related written representations from the reporting persons, the company believes that all filings required to be made by its reporting persons were filed on a timely basis.

Pursuant to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, M&T’s directors and certain officers, as well as persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the outstanding shares of M&T’s common stock, are required to file reports regarding their initial M&T stock ownership and subsequent changes to their ownership with the SEC.  Based solely on a review of the reports filed for fiscal year 2020 and related written representations, the Company believes that all filings required to be made by its reporting persons were filed on a timely basis, except for a late Form 4 filing by each of Messrs. Baird, Grossi and Sadler to report an equity award received  for his service on a regional Directors Advisory Council of M&T Bank.  These late filings were due to an inadvertent administrative error and not an error of the reporting person.

M&T Bank Corporation Insider Trading Policy

All of M&T’s directors, officers and employees are subject to M&T’s Insider Trading Policy. The Insider Trading Policy prohibits the purchase or sale of M&T securities by persons who possess material, nonpublic information, as well as the unauthorized disclosure of such information to others, and also sets forth M&T’s trading window limitations. In addition, as described below, the Insider Trading Policy sets forth M&T’s anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies.

Anti-Hedging Policy. All directors, officers and employees are prohibited from engaging in any transactions that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in the market value of M&T securities or from engaging in any form of short-term trading in M&T securities. Such prohibited short-term trading transactions include those involving exchange-traded options and the use of puts and calls, caps and collars and short sales, and prohibited hedging transactions include those involving prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, exchange funds and other derivatives that are designed to hedge.

Anti-Pledging Policy. All directors and executive officers are prohibited from holding M&T securities in a margin account, borrowing against any account in which M&T securities are held or pledging M&T securities as collateral for a loan or other indebtedness, except in the following limited circumstances: (1) the director or executive officer may only pledge shares he or she holds in excess of M&T’s applicable stock ownership guidelines, (2) the director or executive officer must have the financial ability to repay the loan or margin call without resorting to the pledged securities, (3) in the case of an executive officer, prior to any pledging transaction, the executive officer must consult with M&T’s Chief Legal Officer to confirm compliance with the policy, and (4) any decision by a director to engage in a pledging transaction must be reported to the N&G Committee and the Chairman of the Board, and any decision by an executive officer to engage in pledging must be reported to the N&G Committee and the Chief Executive Officer.

 

34

LOGO


Transactions with Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Shareholders

Directors and executive officers of M&T and their immediate family members and affiliated entities are, and have been, customers of, and have had transactions with the banking and other operating subsidiaries of M&T, and additional transactions may be expected to take place in the future between such persons and M&T’s subsidiaries. As described in “Board Independence” under the section titled “Corporate Governance of M&T Bank Corporation,” the Board reviews such related party or affiliate transactions in its review and assessment of director independence. Additionally, these transactions are subject to M&T’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. See “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” under the section titled “Corporate Governance of M&T Bank Corporation” above for more information.

Regulation O Policies and Procedures. Any financial services provided to directors, executive officers and their immediate family members and affiliated entities are offered in the ordinary course of business, upon substantially the same terms and conditions, including price, as we provide to similarly situated customers. M&T’s subsidiary banks extend credit to some of the directors and their immediate family members and affiliated entities. All such extensions of credit outstanding at any time since January 1, 2023, comply with our policies and procedures and Federal Reserve Board Regulation O. All extensions of credit were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to M&T or its subsidiary banks, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Related-Party Transactions Policy. The Board adopted a written related-party transactions policy in November 2022. Under the policy, our executive officers, directors (and nominees), large shareholders, and their immediate family members (each a “Related Party”) may not enter into a transaction with M&T or a subsidiary in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which the Related Party has a direct or indirect material interest, without approval from the N&G Committee. Under certain circumstances, a related party transaction may be brought before the Board for consideration, and the Board may elect to review any proposed related party transaction or designate another independent body of the Board to review the proposed transaction. Under the policy, Related Parties are deemed not to have a direct or indirect material interest in various types of transactions, including certain compensation provided in connection with the discharge of duties; indemnification or advancement of expenses; charitable contributions; transactions involving competitive bids; ordinary course loans and other ordinary course deposit, banking, commercial, fiduciary or other financial services relationships; and transactions in which a Related Party’s interest derives solely from his or her service as a director of another entity or from certain equity interests.

Our N&G Committee (or Board or other independent body of the Board) will take into account the following factors, as appropriate, among other factors it deems appropriate in approving or rejecting a proposed transaction: (i) the benefits to M&T and whether the transaction is consistent with the interests of M&T and its shareholders; (ii) whether the transaction would impair the independence of an otherwise independent non-employee director; (iii) the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; (iv) whether the terms of the transaction are fair to M&T and on the same basis as would apply if the transaction did not involve a Related Party; and (v) whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest.

Certain Transactions. A family member of one of our executive officers (Michael J. Todaro) and a family member of one of our directors (John P. Barnes) each is employed as non-executive officer employee of M&T Bank. During 2023, each person earned more than $120,000 in total direct compensation from M&T Bank. This compensation is within the range for employees within the same grade as each person.

 

41

 


forth M&T’s trading window limitations.  In addition, as described below, the Insider Trading Policy sets forth M&T’s anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies.LOGO

35


BlackRock, Inc. and subsidiaries (“BlackRock”) and FMR LLC and subsidiaries (“Fidelity”) were each the beneficial owners of more than 5 percent of our common stock for all or part of 2023. We engaged Blackrock Investment Management, LLC as a sub-advisor, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. as a glidepath manager and utilized BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. funds within our Wilmington Trust, N.A. collective funds. These relationships were in the ordinary course, at arms-length and unrelated to BlackRock’s ownership of our stock. In 2023, our collective funds paid fees of approximately $6.8 million and $1,580 to BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. and Blackrock Investment Management, LLC, respectively. Our Collective Investment Trust business was divested in April 2023. Additionally, we engage Fidelity Stock Plan Services LLC to provide administration and recordkeeping services for its stock plans, including its equity compensation awards and Employee Stock Purchase Program. These relationships are in the ordinary course, at arms-length and unrelated to Fidelity’s ownership of M&T stock. In 2023, we paid fees of approximately $501,395 to Fidelity Stock Plan Services LLC.

36

 

Anti-Hedging Policy.  All directors, officers and employees are prohibited from engaging in any transactions that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in the market value of M&T securities or from engaging in any form of short-term trading in M&T securities.  Such prohibited short-term trading transactions include those involving exchange-traded options and the use of puts and calls, caps and collars and short sales, and prohibited hedging transactions include those involving prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, exchange funds and other derivatives that are designed to hedge.LOGO

Anti-Pledging Policy.  All directors and executive officers are prohibited from holding M&T securities in a margin account, borrowing against any account in which M&T securities are held or pledging M&T securities as collateral for a loan or other indebtedness, except in the following limited circumstances: (1) the director or executive officer may only pledge shares he or she holds in excess of M&T’s applicable stock ownership requirements, (2) the director or executive officer must have the financial ability to repay the loan or margin call without resorting to the pledged securities, (3) in the case of an executive officer, prior to any pledging transaction, the executive officer must consult with M&T’s General Counsel to confirm compliance with the policy, and (4) any decision by  a director to engage in a pledging transaction must be reported to the NCG Committee and the Chairman of the Board, and any decision by an executive officer to engage in pledging must be reported to the NCG Committee and the Chief Executive Officer.      

TRANSACTIONS WITH DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Directors and executive officers of M&T and their immediate family members and affiliated entities are, and have been, customers of, and have had transactions with the banking and other operating subsidiaries of M&T, and additional transactions may be expected to take place in the future between such persons and M&T’s subsidiaries.  Any financial services provided to directors, executive officers and their immediate family members and affiliated entities are offered in the ordinary course of business, upon substantially the same terms and conditions, including price, as we provide to similarly situated customers.  M&T’s subsidiary banks also extend credit to some of the directors and their immediate family members and affiliated entities.  All such extensions of credit outstanding at any time since January 1, 2020, comply with our policies and procedures and Federal Reserve Board Regulation O.  All extensions of credit were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to M&T or its subsidiary banks, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.  As described in “Board Independence” under the section titled “Corporate Governance of M&T Bank Corporation,” the Board of Directors reviews such related party or affiliate transactions in its review and assessment of director independence.

M&T’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is applicable to our directors, officers, advisors and employees, as well as to our agents and representatives, including consultants, requires that individuals avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws and other legal requirements, conduct business in an honest and ethical manner, and otherwise act with integrity and in the best interests of M&T.  The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics expects individuals to report any observed illegal or unethical behavior and provides a retaliation-free reporting mechanism.  We use a combination of our policies and established review procedures, including adherence to NYSE standards, to ensure related party transactions are reviewed, approved and ratified, as appropriate. We do not maintain these policies and procedures under a single written policy.


42


PROPOSAL 2

ADVISORY, NON-BINDING PROPOSAL TO APPROVE THE 2020 COMPENSATION OF M&T BANK CORPORATION’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

M&T Bank Corporation believes that its 2020 compensation policies and practices are centered on a pay-for-performance culture and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of its shareholders, while reducing incentives for unnecessary and excessive risk taking.  Our executive compensation programs are described in detail in the sections titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation.”

Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) and related SEC rules require that all U.S. public companies provide their shareholders with an advisory vote on the compensation of their named executive officers.  At each Annual Meeting of Shareholders since M&T’s 2011 Annual Meeting, the Board has provided shareholders with the ability to vote, on an advisory basis, on the compensation of M&T’s named executive officers.

This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives shareholders the opportunity to vote on the overall compensation program of M&T and specifically as it applies to the named executive officers through the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the 2020 compensation paid to M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby approved.”

The shareholder vote on this matter is advisory, meaning that it will serve as a recommendation to the Board, but will not be binding.  The NCG

ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE TO APPROVE THE 2023 COMPENSATION OF M&T BANK CORPORATION’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

M&T Bank Corporation believes that its 2023 compensation policies and practices are centered on a pay-for-performance culture and are strongly aligned with the long-term interests of its shareholders, while reducing incentives for unnecessary and excessive risk taking. Our executive compensation programs are described in detail in the sections titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” below.

Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and related SEC rules require that all U.S. public companies provide their shareholders with an advisory vote on the compensation of their named executive officers. At each Annual Meeting of Shareholders since M&T’s 2011 Annual Meeting, the Board has provided shareholders with the ability to vote, on an advisory basis, on the compensation of M&T’s named executive officers.

This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives shareholders the opportunity to vote on the overall compensation program of M&T and specifically as it applies to the named executive officers through the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the 2023 compensation paid to M&T Bank Corporation’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby approved.”

The shareholder vote on this matter is advisory, meaning that it will serve as a recommendation to the Board, but will not be binding. The C&HC Committee will consider the outcome of this vote when determining future executive compensation arrangements.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF
THE 2020

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE 2023 COMPENSATION OF M&T BANK CORPORATION’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

 

 

43


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Named Executive OfficersLOGO

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) provides information regarding the 2020 compensation of M&T’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), M&T’s Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO and CFO (collectively, the “NEOs”).  For 2020,

37


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Named Executive Officers

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) provides information regarding the 2023 compensation of M&T’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), M&T’s current and former Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO and CFO (collectively, the “NEOs”). For 2023, our NEOs were the following individuals:

 

Name

Name

Title

René F. Jones

Chairman

Chief Executive Officer

Daryl N. Bible

Senior Executive Vice President

Chief Financial Officer

Darren J. King

Senior Executive Vice President

Co-Head of Businesses & Former Chief Financial Officer

Kevin J. Pearson

Vice Chairman & Co-Head of Businesses

Christopher E. Kay

Senior Executive Vice President

Head of Enterprise Platforms

Doris P. Meister

Senior Executive Vice President

Head of Wealth Management

René F. Jones

Chairman

Chief Executive Officer
38

LOGO

Darren J. King

Executive Vice President

Chief Financial Officer

Richard S. Gold

President

Chief Operating Officer

Kevin J. Pearson

Vice Chairman

Doris P. Meister

Executive Vice President

Wealth Management



Overview of M&T Bank Corporation

M&T’s vision is focused on long-term sustained performance. We strive to consistently maintain a conservative risk profile and a strong financial position to ensure high levels of service to our customers and communities throughout economic cycles.

2023 Financial Performance Highlights

M&T’s results for 2023 reflected a year of strong performance as measured by several key metrics including diluted net operating earnings per common share, net operating return on average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity with 2023 operating results exceeding 2022 performance on all three metrics(1). M&T’s 2023 financial performance reflects disciplined balance sheet management, prudent pricing during a period of higher rates and customer disintermediation, and diligent expense management to generate positive operating leverage. Through a period of economic uncertainty, M&T grew Tangible Book Value per Share and Common Equity Tier 1 capital while reducing its Stress Capital Buffer during the year. Notwithstanding M&T’s strong results cited below, and our performance relative to our peer group, M&T’s performance on diluted net operating earnings per common share, net operating return on average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity were below its Operating Plan largely driven by the rate environment. Specific 2023 performance highlights are noted below:(2)

 

44

GAAP-basis net income in 2023 totaled $2.74 billion, increasing 38% from $1.99 billion in 2022;

 


Overview of M&T Bank CorporationDiluted earnings per common share, which include merger-related expenses in 2022, were $15.79 compared with $11.53 in 2022; diluted net operating earnings per common share(1) increased 12% to $16.08 from $14.42 in 2022;

GAAP-basis net income expressed as rate of return on average assets and average common shareholders’ equity of 1.33% and 11.06%, respectively, as compared with 1.05% and 8.67% in 2022; net operating return on average tangible assets and average tangible common equity(1) were 1.42% and 17.60%, respectively, as compared with 1.35% and 16.70% in 2022;

 

M&T's vision is focused on long-term sustained performance.  We strive to consistently maintain a conservative risk profile and a strong financial position to ensure high levels of service to our customers and communities throughout economic cycles.

Taxable-equivalent net interest income for 2023 was $7.17 billion, compared with $5.86 billion in 2022 reflecting a higher net interest margin (3.83% in 2023 vs. 3.39% in 2022) and a larger balance sheet; average loans grew 11% in 2023 primarily driven by commercial and industrial loans;

Our objectives include:

Dedication to the creation and preservation of shareholder value

Conservative credit standards

Disciplined but opportunistic acquisition strategy

Focus on operating efficiency

M&T is a financial holding company that, through its subsidiary banks, offers a wide range of retail and commercial banking, trust, wealth advisory and investment services to its customers.  Founded in 1856, M&T strives to be the best company our employees work for, the best bank our customers ever do business with, and the best investment our shareholders make.  M&T concluded 2020 as one of the 20 largest U.S. based commercial bank holding companies with over 715 domestic branches and 1,750 ATMs across our footprint.

2020 Financial Performance Highlights

The 2020 financial results of M&T, and the banking industry overall, were materially impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in substantially curtailed economic activities and near zero short-term interest rates for the majority of the year.  The adverse economic conditions not only posed revenue challenges, but also resulted in elevated credit costs.  The concurrent adoption of Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) accounting guidance, that requires institutions to reserve for expected losses over the contractual term of the assets, further exacerbated the credit costs.  Strong performance in certain business segments and disciplined expense management aided in partly offsetting these adverse impacts to the 2020 financial results.  Specific 2020 performance highlights are noted below:(1)

 Diluted earnings per common share were $9.94 compared to $13.75 in 2019.

     GAAP-basis net income expressed as rate of return on average assets and average common shareholders’ equity of 1.00% and 8.72%, respectively, compared to 1.61% and 12.87% in 2019.

     Net interest income declined by 6.5% as the Federal Reserve took action to lower interest rates in response to the pandemic.

     Non-interest income excluding gains/losses on investment securities grew 2.7% from prior year, aided by strong residential mortgage and trust revenues.

     Expenses declined 2.4% from prior year as efforts to slow spending amid the pandemic resulted in lower expense driven by a decrease in incentives, professional services, marketing, and travel & entertainment expense.

     Net charge-offs expressed as a percentage of average loans was 0.26%, increasing from the low 2019 level of 0.16%, but still below M&T’s long-term average of 0.34%; total provision for credit losses was $800 million compared to $176 million in 2019, reflecting the reserve build for expected losses in the worsened economic conditions; provision expense for 2020 reflects the new CECL accounting guidance while 2019 provision reflected the incurred loss accounting methodology.

Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of loans outstanding increased to 1.76% at December 31, 2020, compared to 1.16% at December 31, 2019.

While building adequate reserves for the expected losses, M&T was also able to boost its Common Equity Tier 1 ratio, increasing to 10.0% at year-end 2020 from 9.73% at the end of 2019.  

During 2020, M&T maintained a quarterly common stock dividend per share of $1.10 resulting in $569 million payout to our shareholders.  M&T also repurchased 2.6 million shares of common stock valued at $374 million during the first quarter of 2020 before the economic conditions worsened.

(1)  For more information, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in M&T’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 22, 2021.

 

Non-interest income excluding gains/losses on investment securities grew 7% from prior year, driven by growth in mortgage banking revenues, particularly in mortgage servicing, and commercial service charges; reported 2023 non-interest income includes a $225 million gain on the sale of Collective Investment Trust business while reported 2022 non-interest income included a $136 million gain on the sale of the M&T Insurance Agency;

45

 


M&T’s Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The objectives of M&T’s executive compensation programs are to attract and retain executives capable of maximizing performance forNon-interest operating expense(1) grew 14% from the benefit of M&T and its shareholders.  We endeavor, over time and based on performance, to establish total direct compensation (“TDC”) inprior year. 2023 results include a competitive range around the median of the market for our compensation peer group.  Our longstanding compensation philosophy is to emphasize long-term equity-based compensation for our NEOs.  This philosophy allows us to align our compensation with performance in the following important ways:

by linking the size of individual equity awards to the NEO’s roles/responsibilities and anticipated contributions as well as to the performance of M&T;

by tying a significant portion of the NEOs’ ultimate realized compensation to the future value of M&T common stock, in alignment with our shareholders;

by balancing growth with prudent risk taking, through the use of performance-based stock unit awards that vest in alignment with levels of performance; and

through a culture of stock ownership and retention, including in accordance with M&T’s Stock Ownership Guidelines for executives, resulting in each NEO having a substantial financial stake tied to the long-term performance of M&T.

Further, to execute on this philosophy, the NCG Committee engages in the following activities:

performs an annual assessment, for each NEO, of the “market price of the seat” and balances external data with an executive’s experience, their role/responsibilities, and anticipated contributions;

assesses short-term performance and awards variable compensation based on a balanced discretionaryspecial FDIC assessment of holistic bank$197 million; excluding this impact, non-interest operating expense grew 10% from 2022, largely driven by a full year of operations of People’s United Financial, Inc. and individual performance;

emphasizes equityincreased compensation which ties a significant portion of the NEO’s ultimate realized compensation to the future value of M&T common stock, in alignment with our shareholders;costs;

uses performance-based stock unit awards that vest in alignment with levels of performance over time; and

encourages a culture of stock ownership and retention, further ensuring our NEOs’ alignment with shareholders.

The following illustrates some important features of our executive compensation program:

 

What We Do:

Net charge-offs expressed as a percentage of average loans was 0.33% compared with 0.13% in 2022;

What We Don’t Do:

   Strong alignment between pay and performance

X    Hedging or pledging of M&T securities (except in limited circumstances)

   Discourage excessive risk taking through program design

X    Repricing of stock options

  Maintain robust Stock Ownership Guidelines

X    “Timing” of equity grants (i.e., we only grant long-term incentives on pre-determined dates)

  Retain an independent compensation consultant to advise and support the NCG Committee in its role

X    Tax gross-ups (other than in connection with relocation)

  Maintain a compensation forfeiture policy and subject incentives to risk adjustments

X    Pay dividends on unvested stock (starting with 2020 grants) or unearned performance units

  Review share utilization

X   Grant excessive severance, pension or other benefits

  Annual risk assessment of incentive compensation plans

X   Enter into employment contracts with our executives

 

46

In 2023, M&T’s common stock dividend grew 8% representing the 7th year of consecutive increases; in Q1 2023 M&T repurchased 3.8 million shares at a total cost of $600 million, or 2% of outstanding shares, no shares were repurchased in the last three quarters of 2023; M&T’s Common Equity Tier 1 ratio remained strong at 10.98% at the end of 2023, up from 10.44% at year-end 2022; Tangible Book Value per Share grew 14% from $86.59 at the end of 2022 to $98.54 at the end of 2023.

 


(1)

ComponentsM&T consistently provides supplemental reporting of Executive Compensation

The components of executive compensation, described below, align withits results on a “net operating” or “tangible” basis, from which M&T’s philosophy to emphasize long-term equity-based compensation, while providing executive compensation that will attract and retain executive officers capable of achieving M&T’s performance objectives.

Compensation
Element

Objective

Determination of Award Levels and Key Features

Base Salary

    Provides fixed pay reflective of an executive’s role, responsibilities and individual performance

    Scope of the executive’s responsibilities

    Experience

    Internal and external comparison

    Past and expected future performance  

Short-Term:

Cash Incentive

(“STI”)

    Provides discretionary annual incentive opportunity generally reflective of overall bank and individual performance; considers both quantitative and qualitative performance

Quantitative – reflects balance between financial and risk performance  

Qualitative – reflects progress towards key strategic initiatives and other individual performance factors

    Pool funded based on a percentage of net operating income (“NOI”)

    Rewards NEOs based on:

    Corporate performance as reflected by financial results (including key metrics such as NOI, EPS, Return on Tangible Common Equity (“ROTCE”)(1) and returns to shareholders)

    Achievement of annual performance objectives (financial and non-financial)

    Risk management and adherence to risk appetite

    Other key strategic initiatives for the year

Long-Term:

Equity-Based Incentive

(“LTI”)

    Provides discretionary equity-based incentive opportunity generally reflective of overall bank and individual performance

    Aligns rewards with sustained long-term shareholder value

    Provides a strong retention tool

    Unearned/unvested awards subject to forfeiture

    Equity-based incentives awarded to NEOs in the form of performance-based stock unit awards and stock options

    Performance-Based Stock Unit Awards Key Features:

    Performance Hurdled Stock Units (“PHSUs”)

oVesting: Ratably at target over 3 years

oPerformance Metric: Absolute ROTCE

Performance Vested Stock Units (“PVSUs”)

oVesting: Cliff vest after 3-year performance period with final payout ranging from 0%-150% of target based on performance

oPerformance Metric: Absolute ROTCE and Relative ROTCE to peer group

    Stock Options Key Features:

    Vesting: 3-year annual pro-rata

    Option Term: 10 years

    Rewards NEOs based on:

    Roles/responsibilities and expected future contribution

    Corporate performance relative to peers

    Absolute corporate performance for the immediately preceding year relative to the business plan

    Absolute and relative corporate performance over the three-year period from date of grant

    Long-term, sustained corporate performance

    Peer compensation market data

(1)    Net operating income available to common equity is computed by taking net income available to common equity and adding back&T excludes the after-tax effect of the amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets adding back(and the after-tax effects of merger-related expenses, and subtracting the after-tax effects of merger-related gains.  Average tangible common equity is computed by taking average common equity for the applicable period and subtracting averagerelated goodwill and average core deposit and other intangible assets (netasset balances, net of any related averageapplicable deferred tax amounts). and expenses associated with merging acquired operations into M&T (when incurred), since such items are considered by management to be “nonoperating” in nature. See Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in M&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2024 (the “2023 Form 10-K”) for a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with these corresponding non-GAAP amounts.

 

47
(2)

For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the 2023 Form 10-K

 


2020 Performance Year Pay Mix

Our executive compensation program provides for a market-competitive mix of base salary, short-term cash incentives and long-term equity-based incentives that vestLOGO

39


In addition to the above financial highlights from 2023, M&T continued to focus on its core businesses across a growing footprint, helping our clients achieve their financial goals while making a difference in people’s lives throughout 2023. M&T regularly assesses the health and vitality of each of our businesses to see where we might be able to deliver more value for our clients and our shareholders. As part of that exercise, last year we sold our Collective Investment Trust business to a firm with deep expertise in the space. This transaction aims to scale the support we can provide to our clients while positively impacting the returns we deliver for our shareholders.

M&T’s Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The objectives of M&T’s executive compensation programs are to attract and retain executives capable of maximizing performance for the benefit of M&T and its shareholders. We endeavor, over time and based on performance, to establish total direct compensation (“TDC”) in a competitive range around the median of the market for our compensation peer group. Our longstanding compensation philosophy is to emphasize long-term equity-based compensation for our NEOs. This philosophy, combined with C&HC Committee engagement and oversight, allows us to align our compensation with performance by:

linking the size of individual equity awards to the NEO’s role, responsibilities and prior and anticipated future contributions, as well as to the performance of M&T;

tying a significant portion of the NEOs’ ultimate realized compensation to future performance and the value of M&T common stock, in alignment with our shareholders;

balancing growth with prudent risk taking, through the use of equity compensation with robust forfeiture provisions;

creating a culture of stock ownership and retention, including through M&T’s Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Executives;

performing, for each NEO, an annual assessment of the “market price of the seat” and balancing external data with an executive’s experience, role, responsibilities, and prior and anticipated future contributions; and

assessing short-term performance and awarding variable compensation based on a balanced discretionary assessment of holistic bank and individual performance.

We design our executive compensation program to promote risk mitigation and good governance, which includes maintaining the following best practices:

What We Do:What We Don’t Do:

✓ Strong alignment between pay and performance

LOGOHedging or pledging of M&T securities (except in limited circumstances pursuant to prescribed policy)

✓ Discourage excessive risk taking through program design

LOGORepricing of stock options

✓ Maintain robust Stock Ownership & Retention Guidelines

LOGO“Timing” of equity grants (i.e., instead we only grant long-term incentives on pre-determined dates)

✓ Retain an independent compensation consultant to advise and support the C&HC Committee in its role

LOGOTax gross-ups (other than in connection with relocation)

✓ Maintain a compensation forfeiture policy which subjects incentives to risk adjustments

LOGOPay dividends on unvested stock units or unearned performance units

✓ Review share utilization

LOGOGrant excessive severance, pension or other benefits

✓ Annual risk assessment of incentive compensation plans

LOGOEnter into employment contracts with our executives

✓ Routinely engage with shareholders

✓ Use a peer group to provide perspective on competitive pay levels

40

LOGO


2023 Say-on-Pay Vote and Shareholder Outreach

Our 2023 shareholder vote on executive compensation passed with 93.39% support. The C&HC Committee considered this to be an indication that our shareholders believe that the NEOs’ compensation is aligned with the performance of M&T.

In addition, we regularly engage with our shareholders’ proxy voting and investor stewardship teams to gain a deeper understanding of the perspectives and concerns related to our executive compensation programs. In these meetings, our shareholders have generally expressed a positive view with respect to our executive compensation program.

We regularly evaluate whether our executive compensation programs support our compensation philosophy and objectives and monitor program alignment with our priorities. Further, we continue to look for ways to provide transparent disclosure around these programs. In connection with this review, combined with other factors discussed in this CD&A as well as the feedback we received from our shareholders, the C&HC Committee made the following changes in recent years:

Continuing to emphasize the link between long-term company performance and executive compensation by issuing a significant proportion of NEO Long Term Incentive (“LTI”) in the form of Performance-Vested Stock Units (“PVSUs”), providing an increase in the proportion delivered in PVSUs for 2023 performance that were granted in 2024; and

Developing and introducing performance scorecards for our NEOs that explicitly link company, business unit/function and individual performance to compensation determinations for formal use in performance year 2023 and beyond.

LOGO

41


Components of Executive Compensation

The components of our executive compensation program, described below, align with M&T’s philosophy to emphasize long-term equity-based compensation, while providing compensation that will attract and retain executive officers capable of achieving M&T’s performance objectives.

Compensation
Element

ObjectiveDetermination of Award Levels and Key Features

Base Salary

• Provides fixed pay reflective of an executive’s role, responsibilities and individual performance

• Scope of the executive’s responsibilities

• Experience

• Internal and external comparison

• Past and expected future performance

• Peer compensation philosophymarket data

Short-Term:

Cash Incentive

(“STI”)

• Provides annual incentive opportunity generally reflective of overall bank and the objectives cited above.  M&T’sindividual performance; considers both quantitative and qualitative performance

• Quantitative – reflects balance between financial and risk performance

• Qualitative – reflects progress towards key strategic initiatives and other individual performance factors

• Pool funded based on a percentage of operating income

• Rewards NEOs based on:

Ø Company performance as reflected by financial results disclosed above were materially impacted by(including key metrics such as net operating income, EPS, Efficiency Ratio, Return on Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE), Return on Tangible Assets (ROTA) and returns to shareholders)(1)

Ø Achievement of annual performance objectives across all stakeholder groups (customers, communities, employees and regulators, including both financial and non-financial measures)

Ø Risk management and adherence to risk appetite

Ø Other key strategic initiatives for the COVID-19 global pandemic. Asyear

Ø Award values also consider peer compensation market data

Long-Term:

Equity-Based Incentive

(“LTI”)

• Provides equity-based incentive opportunity generally reflective of overall bank and individual performance

• Aligns rewards with sustained long-term performance and shareholder value

• Provides a resultstrong retention tool

• Unearned/unvested awards subject to forfeiture

• Equity-based incentives awarded to NEOs in the form of reduced earnings, discretionary incentive pools were reduced by approximately 30%performance-based stock unit awards and stock options

• Performance-based stock unit awards key features:

Ø Performance-Hurdled Stock Units (PHSUs)

¡   Vesting: Ratably at target over 2019 levelsthree years

¡   Performance Metric: Absolute ROTCE(1)

Ø Performance-Vested Stock Unit Awards (PVSUs)

¡   Vesting: Cliff vest after a 3-year performance period with final payout ranging from 0%-150% of target based on performance

¡   Performance Metric: Absolute ROTCE and Relative ROTCE to peer group(1)

¡   Beginning with the organization funded a more limited salary increase budget. For retention2024 grant, the Performance Metrics will also include Absolute and continued shareholder alignment, LTI awardsRelative ROTA(1)

• Non-Qualified Stock Options (NQ Stock Options) key features:

Ø Vesting: 3-year annual pro-rata

Ø Option Term: 10 years

• Initial award value is based on:

Ø Roles/responsibilities and expected future contribution

Ø Company and individual performance for NEOs were maintained at 2019 levels or increased.the immediately preceding year

Ø Consideration of peer compensation market data

• Amount ultimately realized is based on:

Ø Absolute company performance for the immediately preceding year relative to the business plan

Ø Absolute and relative company performance over the 3-year period from date of grant

Ø Long-term, sustained corporate performance and stock price

(1)

The charts below representC&HC Committee and management use certain non-GAAP financial measures as they believe they better reflect the 2020 performance year total compensation pay miximpact of our CEO and the average of all of our other NEOs.  For purposesacquisition activity in reported results. See Appendix A of this and other “performance year” disclosures in this CD&A, compensation for the “performance year” consists of annual base salary as of the end of the performance year, cash incentive paid in the following year for the prior year’s performance,proxy statement as well as “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the 2023 Form 10-K for a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with these corresponding non-GAAP amounts. See Appendix A of this proxy statement as well for a description of how ROTCE and ROTA are calculated.

42

LOGO


2023 Performance Year Pay Mix

Our executive compensation program provides for a market-competitive mix of base salary, short-term cash incentives (STI) and long-term equity-based incentives (LTI) that vest over time in alignment with our compensation philosophy and the objectives cited above. In light of the financial results cited above, the short-term incentive plan funding for the company was established at 90% of target, with target representing a fully funded market-competitive STI pool.

Executive performance scorecards were introduced for 2023 performance year and serve to provide more structure around our performance-guided discretionary variable compensation program, specifically with respect to short-term incentive awards. The executive performance scorecards consider overall bank performance, in addition to the performance of the business unit(s) or functional area(s) led by each NEO and their individual contributions predominantly with respect to risk management, leadership and talent development. As a result of the executive performance scorecard review, short-term incentives were increased for some NEOs and decreased for others. For continued retention and shareholder alignment, LTI awards for NEOs were maintained at 2022 performance year levels or increased modestly to better reflect market competitiveness.

The charts below represent the 2023 performance year total compensation pay mix of our CEO and the average of our other NEOs. For purposes of this and other “performance year” disclosures in this CD&A, compensation for the “performance year” consists of (i) annual base salary as of the end of the performance year, (ii) STI paid in the following year for the prior year’s performance, and (iii) the LTI award (target value) granted in the following year for the prior year’s performance and in consideration of anticipated future contributions. The LTI award is comprised of PHSUs, PVSUs and NQ Stock Options. This view differs from the disclosure in the 2023 Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) set forth in the “Executive Compensation” section beginning on page 65 below, in that the LTI awards disclosed in the SCT reflect equity awards granted during 2023 for the prior performance year (i.e., 2022 performance). We prefer the performance year view as this is how we (and many of our peer companies) tend to view executive compensation.

The charts below show the 2023 performance year pay mix for our CEO and the average for our other NEOs, of which 88% of pay is “at risk” for Mr. Jones and, on average, 83% of pay is “at risk” for our other NEOs.

LOGO

LOGO

*Excludes one NEO (Ms. Meister) who was not granted an LTI award (target value) granted in the following year for the prior year’s performance and in consideration of anticipated future contributions.  This view differs from the disclosure in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) set forth in the “Executive Compensation” section beginning on page 65 below in that the LTI award disclosed in the SCT is the LTI award granted during the current year for the prior performance year (i.e., the LTI award granted in 2020 for 2019 performance is what is shown in the SCT beginning on page 65 below).  We prefer the performance year view as this is how we (and our peer companies) tend to view annual compensation.

The charts below show the 2020 performance year pay mix targets for our CEO and the average for our other NEOs, of which 83% of pay is “at risk” for Mr. Jones and, on average, 74% of pay is “at risk” for our other NEOs.  


48


Roles and Responsibilities

M&T’s executive compensation programs are administered through the joint efforts of various constituents to ensure sound holistic governance around compensation determinations.

Role of the NCG Committee

The NCG Committee is responsible for determining the compensation of the executive officers (including the NEOs) and reporting such determinations to the full Board of Directors.  As discussed below, in determining the amount and mix of compensation to be paid to each NEO, the NCG Committee reviews the compensation levels of the NEOs relative to a group of commercial banking peers similar in size and business mix (the “peer group”).  As part of this review, the NCG Committee also considers the financial performance of M&T relative to the peer group, as well as certain other factors, including M&T’s stock price performance and relative shareholder returns, compensation mix strategy, risk management, and individual/corporate performance.

The NCG Committee’s responsibilities include:

annually reviewing and approving the corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO compensation and evaluating the CEO’s performance2024 in light of her upcoming transition to a consulting role. See page 60 below.

LOGO

43


Roles and Responsibilities

M&T’s executive compensation programs are administered through the joint efforts of various constituents to ensure sound holistic governance around compensation determinations.

Role of the C&HC Committee

The C&HC Committee is responsible for determining M&T’s compensation philosophy and objectives, as well as compensation of the executive officers (including the NEOs) and reporting such determinations to the full Board. As discussed below, in determining the amount and mix of compensation to be paid to each NEO, the C&HC Committee reviews the compensation levels of the NEOs relative to a group of commercial banking peers that are similar in size and business mix (the “peer group”). As part of this review, the C&HC Committee also considers the financial performance of M&T relative to the peer group, as well as certain other factors, including M&T’s stock price performance and relative shareholder returns, compensation mix philosophy, risk management, and individual and corporate performance.

The C&HC Committee’s responsibilities include:

annually reviewing and approving the corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO compensation and evaluating the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives;

annually reviewing and approving the base salaries, annual incentive opportunities and overall TDC of the NEOs; and

annually reviewing and approving equity award opportunities of the NEOs.

The NCG Committee receives reports from the CFO and Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) regarding M&T’s financial performance and risk management performance, respectively, prior to finalizing TDC for the NEOs.  Additionally, the NCG Committee’s independent compensation consultant participates in meetings throughout the year, as requested.

Role of the Office of the Chairman

The Office of the Chairman consists of Messrs. Jones, Gold and Pearson.  The Office of the Chairman provided the performance assessments for the executive officers (including with respect to Mr. King and Ms. Meister) and made compensation recommendations to the NCG Committee in this regard.  Ultimate decision-making authority for the compensation determinations for all NEOs, including members of the Office of the Chairman, however, lies solely with the NCG Committee.

Role of Independent Compensation Consultant

In 2020, the NCG Committee continued to retain McLagan, which is part of the Rewards Solutions practice at Aon plc, to provide executive compensation consulting services.  McLagan’s role is to provide analysis and advice to the NCG Committee relative to the amount and form of executive compensation, attend NCG Committee meetings, as requested, and advise the NCG Committee on executive compensation levels, market trends, regulatory issues and other developments that may impact M&T’s executive compensation programs.  In 2020, McLagan performed the following services for the NCG Committee:

recommended the peer group used for compensation benchmarking for the NEOs;

conducted detailed market analyses on executive and director compensation relative to our peer group, including all elements of TDC, and advised on general industry pay practices;

 

49


advised the NCG Committee on contemporary pay practices to create executive compensation opportunities that align more closely with M&T’s strategic objectives and long-term performance;

advised the NCG Committee on market competitive base salaries, annual cash incentives and long-term incentives for NEOs;

annually reviewing and approving the base salaries, annual incentive opportunities and overall TDC of the NEOs and other Section 16 executive officers; and

advised the NCG Committee on regulatory issues.

The fees for these services totaled $248,342.  McLagan/Aon also provided $148,199 in additional compensation survey/advisory services to management during 2020.  Management engaged McLagan/Aon for these services after consultation with the NCG Committee.  Based on an assessment of NYSE factors, the NCG Committee determined that McLagan was independent and that engagement of McLagan did not present any conflicts of interest.  McLagan also determined that it was independent from our management and confirmed this in a written statement delivered to the NCG Committee.

Peer Group

On an annual basis, the NCG Committee, with the assistance of McLagan, benchmarks compensation levels for each of the NEOs to the compensation peer group - a group of commercial banking institutions of similar business makeup, size and geographic reach.  For the 2020 year-end compensation review, M&T updated the compensation peer group (used to benchmark compensation levels for NEOs) to mirror the financial peer group (used to benchmark our financial performance) and in doing so, added U.S. Bancorp and First Horizon National Corporation. In 2019, BB&T and SunTrust completed a merger to form Truist Financial Corporation, limiting the prior peer group to 9 banks. To ensure statistical reliability of the sample, M&T sought to add additional peers. Given recent growth of First Horizon National Corporation (who acquired Iberiabank Corporation), they were subsequently added to the financial performance peer group, which, historically, was the same as the compensation peer group, plus US Bancorp. M&T saw the opportunity to add one smaller peer and one larger peer to maintain relative size positioning among the peer group and align both the financial and compensation peer groups.

The eleven commercial banking companies listed below were identified by selecting a group of U.S. based commercial bank holding companies generally having assets or market capitalization between one-half to two times M&T and excluding those that had a significantly dissimilar business mix, or had a substantial international presence:

Size Statistics (as of June 30, 2020 – utilized during peer group review)

Peer

Assets (in Millions)

Market Cap (in Millions)

U.S. Bancorp (USB)

546,652

55,464

Truist Financial Corporation (TFC)

504,336

50,603

PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC)

458,978

44,714

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB)

202,906

13,731

Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG)

179,847

10,773

KeyCorp (KEY)

171,192

11,887

 

50

annually reviewing and approving equity award opportunities of the NEOs.

The C&HC Committee receives reports from the CFO and Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) regarding M&T’s financial performance and risk management performance, respectively, prior to finalizing TDC for the NEOs. The C&HC Committee regularly meets with the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer, and Chief Talent Officer to review the effectiveness of the bank’s performance management, compensation, and succession planning practices. This increases transparency and governance in areas such as pay-for-performance, pay equity, identification of succession risks, and management’s efforts to mitigate those risks by preparing future leaders to operate the bank. To further support succession planning, in 2023 the C&HC Committee held a joint meeting with the N&G Committee to review succession plans for executive leadership roles, including Chief Executive Officer, and other key positions and intends to hold this meeting annually going forward. Additionally, the C&HC Committee’s independent compensation consultant, whose role is described more fully below, participates in meetings throughout the year, as requested.

Role of the Chief Executive Officer

The Chief Executive Officer (and the Vice Chairman, with respect to Ms. Meister only) provided the performance assessments for the NEOs (other than the Chief Executive Officer) and made compensation recommendations to the C&HC Committee in this regard. Performance achieved against business unit/function and individual goals set in early 2023, as well as overall bank financial results and risk management were considered when making the initial compensation recommendations. Ultimate decision making authority for the compensation determinations for all NEOs, including the Chief Executive Officer, however, lies solely with the C&HC Committee.

Role of Independent Compensation Consultant

In 2023, the C&HC Committee continued to retain McLagan, which is part of the Human Capital Solutions practice at Aon plc, to provide executive compensation consulting services. McLagan’s role is to provide analysis and advice to the C&HC Committee regarding the amount and form of executive compensation, attend C&HC Committee meetings, as requested, and advise the C&HC Committee on executive compensation levels, market trends, regulatory issues and other developments that may impact

 

44

 


Regions Financial Corporation (RF)

144,070

10,676

M&T (MTB)

139,537

22,167

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN)

118,425

9,191

Comerica Incorporated (CMA)

84,397

5,297

First Horizon National Corporation (FHN)*

83,000

7,082

Zions Bancorporation (ZION)

76,447

5,575

Median (excluding M&T)

171,192

10,773

*Pro-forma asset size statistics were utilized for First Horizon at the time of this review; market cap shown above for First Horizon is as of December 31, 2020.

Process for Determining 2020 NEO CompensationLOGO


M&T’s executive compensation programs. In 2023, McLagan performed the following services for the C&HC Committee:

recommended the peer group used as a reference for compensation decisions for the NEOs;

conducted detailed market analyses on executive and director compensation relative to our peer group, including all elements of TDC, and advised on general industry pay practices;

advised the C&HC Committee on contemporary pay practices to create executive compensation opportunities that align more closely with M&T’s strategic objectives and long-term performance;

advised the C&HC Committee on market competitive base salaries, annual cash incentives and long-term incentives for NEOs; and

advised the C&HC Committee on regulatory issues.

The fees for these services totaled $304,698. McLagan/Aon also provided $305,299 in additional compensation survey/advisory services to management during 2023. Management engaged McLagan/Aon for these services after consultation with the C&HC Committee. Based on an assessment of SEC and NYSE factors, the C&HC Committee determined that McLagan was independent and that engagement of McLagan did not present any conflicts of interest. McLagan also determined that it was independent from our management and confirmed this in a written statement delivered to the C&HC Committee.

Peer Group

On an annual basis, the C&HC Committee, with the assistance of McLagan, makes decisions about compensation levels for each of the NEOs with reference to the compensation peer group—a group of commercial banking institutions of similar business makeup, size and geographic reach. For the 2023 year-end compensation review, M&T continued the practice of having the same peer group for both compensation (used as a reference for compensation levels for NEOs) and financial (used as a reference for our financial performance) comparison.

The eleven commercial banking companies listed below were identified by selecting a group of U.S.-based commercial bank holding companies generally having assets or market capitalization within a reasonable range of M&T and excluded those that had a significantly dissimilar business mix, or had a substantial international presence. The 2023 peer group is unchanged from 2022:

2023 Peer Group (size statistics as of June 30, 2023)

Peer

    Market Cap (in Millions)     Assets (in Millions) 

U.S. Bancorp (USB)

     50,649      680,825 

PNC Financial Services Group, Inc (PNC)

     50,128      558,207 

Truist Financial Corporation (TFC)

     40,425      554,549 

M&T (MTB)

     20,531      207,672 

Percent Rank

     71%       60%  

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB)

     17,845      207,276 

Regions Financial Corporation (RF)

     16,721      155,656 

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN)

     15,608      188,505 

Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG)

     12,380      223,066 

KeyCorp (KEY)

     8,646      195,037 

First Horizon National Corporation (FHN)

     6,296      85,071 

Comerica Incorporated (CMA)

     5,579      90,761 

Zions Bancorporation (ZION)

     3,979      87,230 

Median (excluding M&T)

     15,608      195,037 

Factors ConsideredLOGO

In determining NEO compensation, the NCG

45


Process for Determining 2023 NEO Compensation

Factors Considered. In determining NEO compensation, the C&HC Committee uses a holistic and balanced discretionary approach, guided by the executive performance scorecards to evaluate performance against the following quantitative and qualitative factors:

 

Quantitative Factors

Qualitative Factors

Operating Income

Qualitative Factors

NOI

Asset quality relative to the banking industry

EPS

Responsiveness to economic environment

Return on Assets

Achievement of business plans

Returns to Shareholders

Achievement of performance objectives related to diversity and inclusion, employee engagement and talent management

Various capital ratios

Leadership and establishment of strategic direction

Competitive market compensation data

Effective risk management and adherence to the risk appetite

One of the key components of our executive compensation program is tying pay to company performance.  At the beginning of each year, bank-wide and business unit specific performance goals are established, as are other goals related to our strategic imperatives.  At the end of the year, the NCG Committee compares these expectations to actual results for M&T and each NEO.  We evaluate corporate performance by using a diverse set of performance metrics to ensure that no single measure can inappropriately impact compensation.  Our performance is evaluated against internal expectations and our operating plan for the year and is balanced with a relative performance evaluation by comparing our results to those of the peer group.  

The NCG Committee reviews an estimated market pay range for each NEO role.  Ranges are developed based on public information and third-party market surveys of compensation for the same or comparable roles at peer firms.  This practice ensures that our NEO pay appropriately reflects market pay, based on varying levels of performance.  On a TDC basis when compared to individuals with similar roles at our compensation peer group of firms, Mr. Jones is positioned just above the 25th percentile; the Committee is committed to moving him towards a more competitive positioning as the performance measures described above would permit. Messrs. King, Gold and Pearson are positioned just below the 50th percentile and Ms. Meister remains positioned above the 50th percentile.  The NCG Committee considers the various quantitative and qualitative factors set forth above in the context of market data,

51


internal equity, the value of the executive’s performance over the long-term, and their future potential with M&T.

Below is a summary of the annual pay for performance review cycle for the 2020 performance year:

Annual Pay for Performance Cycle

Step

Timing

                                                                            Activities

1

1st Quarter of 2020

Set Annual Objectives

1.     Quantitative – 2020 Operating Plan

     Bank-wide goals

     Business-unit specific goals

2.     Qualitative – 2020 Strategic Imperatives

     Differentiate our customer experience

     Grow new customers / develop new markets

     Drive operational effectiveness

     Optimize our risk management infrastructure

     Be a talent and people driven organization

3.     Cascade objectives to each Section 16 Officer

2

3rd Quarter of 2020

Establish Peer Group (as advised by McLagan)

1.Review and update peer group in order to benchmark Section 16 officers’ pay and Board of Directors’ pay

3

4th Quarter of 2020

Preliminary Review and Discussion of NEO and Other Section 16 Officer Competitive Market Data

1.     Review of 2020 Financial Performance including relative performance on key financial metrics

2.     Review 2020 Risk Management Assessment

3.     Review current compensation market position based on peer market data (as advised by McLagan)

4

4th Quarter of 2020

Assess Performance Against the Quantitative and Qualitative Objectives Described Above for NEOs and Other Section 16 Officers

1.     Evaluate performance

     NCG Committee rates CEO’s performance

     NCG Committee and the CEO evaluate and rate the performance of the other Section 16 Officers

2.     Quantitative and qualitative performance is assessed holistically; i.e., without weightings assigned to each goal

5

1st Quarter of 2021

Link Pay to Performance

1.     Finalize performance evaluations for NEOs and other Section 16 Officers

2.     Determine final total compensation, mix of pay and specific pay actions

     2021 Base Salary

     2020 Bonus (Paid in 2021 for 2020 Performance)

     2021 LTI (Granted in 2021 for 2020 Performance)


52


Base Salary

The NCG Committee made 2020 base salary determinations for the NEOs in January 2020.  At that time, given M&T’s performance in 2019 compared to the peer group and its business plan, and the individual performance of each of the NEOs and their respective positioning against competitive market data for their roles, the NCG Committee determined that the base salaries for the NEOs should increase modestly to continue narrowing the gap to market, except for Ms. Meister whose salary remained flat given her competitive market position.

Named Executive Officer

2020 Base Salary (1) ($)

 

2019 Base Salary ($)

 

Percentage

Change

 

René F. Jones

 

1,000,000

 

 

950,000

 

 

5

%

Darren J. King

 

685,000

 

 

670,000

 

 

2

%

Richard S. Gold

 

765,000

 

 

745,000

 

 

3

%

Kevin J. Pearson

 

765,000

 

 

745,000

 

 

3

%

Doris P. Meister

 

800,000

 

 

800,000

 

 

0

%

(1)

In January 2021, the NCG Committee determined that no base salary adjustments for 2021 were necessary reflecting the relatively competitive salary positioning of the NEOs.

Variable Compensation

Due to the discretionary structure of M&T’s incentive programs, NEOs do not have, and historically have not had, target levels of awards or formulaic payout levels for determining performance year incentives. Instead, as described above, the NCG Committee performs an holistic, balanced discretionary assessment of company and individual performance that considers quantitative and qualitative factors, market compensation levels by role, and internal equity.  Consequently, the NCG Committee considered the following factors in making the award determinations in January 2021 for 2020 performance:  

the performance of M&T during 2020 relative to its operating plan and relative to the financial peer group which, while impacted by the COVID-19 global pandemic as described more fullybanking industry

EPS

Responsiveness to economic environment

Return on page 45, nevertheless resulted in top quartileAssets

Achievement of business plans

Returns to Shareholders

Achievement of performance relativeobjectives related to the peer group on certain keydiversity, equity and inclusion, and employee engagement

Various capital ratios

Achievement of performance metrics;
objectives related to customer satisfaction and customer growth

Competitive market compensation data

achievementLeadership and establishment of key strategic objectives;direction

Efficiency ratio

the leadership and contribution of each of the NEOs to that performance;

effectiveEffective risk management and adherence to M&T’sthe risk appetite statement;

One of the key components of our executive compensation program is tying pay to company performance. At the beginning of each year, bank-wide and business unit/function specific performance goals are established, as are other goals related to our strategic imperatives. At the end of the year, the C&HC Committee compares these expectations to actual results for M&T and each NEO. We evaluate corporate performance by using a diverse set of performance metrics to ensure that no single measure can disproportionately impact compensation. Our performance is evaluated against internal expectations and our operating plan for the year and is balanced with a relative performance evaluation by comparing our results to those of the peer group.

STI and Executive Performance Scorecards. To further ensure a strong alignment between performance and compensation determinations (specifically STI awards), executive performance scorecards were developed and introduced for each of the NEOs for performance year 2023. The executive performance scorecards provide a consistent framework to measure company, business unit/function and individual performance against established quantitative and qualitative metrics. In addition, all performance is reviewed in the context of the company’s and the business unit/functional area’s risk appetite. The CRO provides a bankwide and business unit/function specific risk adherence score that was taken into consideration when finalizing performance ratings and the resulting STI awards.

46

LOGO


Below is an illustration of how the executive performance scorecards are structured and what factors/metrics are considered with corresponding weightings. Company performance (strategic imperatives and achievement against operating plan), Business Line/Functional performance (Growth, Profits, Returns, Customer Experience (“CX”) and Employee Experience (“EX”)) and Individual performance (primarily Leadership and Risk Management Outcomes) are all considered in the short-term incentive award determination.

LOGO

Market Analysis. The C&HC Committee reviews an estimated market pay range for each NEO role. Ranges are developed based on public information and third-party market surveys of compensation for the same or comparable roles at peer firms. This practice is designed to ensure that our NEO pay appropriately reflects market pay, based on varying levels of performance. On a TDC basis when compared to the CEOs at our compensation peer group of firms, Mr. Jones is positioned below, but within a competitive range of the 50th percentile. The C&HC Committee determined that all of our other NEOs were appropriately positioned in the range of our peer group compensation data based on tenure in the role and performance.

In establishing pay levels for the NEOs, the C&HC Committee considers the various quantitative and qualitative factors set forth in this CD&A in the context of market data, internal equity, the value of the executive’s performance over the long-term, and their future potential with M&T. In addition, the C&HC Committee reviewed the performance of the NEOs against the executive performance scorecard metrics described above.

LOGO

47


Below is a summary of the annual pay for performance review cycle for the 2023 performance year:

Annual Pay for the roles occupied by eachPerformance Cycle

Step

TimingActivities         

1

1st Quarter of the NEOs.

2023

Short-term (Cash) Incentive CompensationSet Annual Objectives

 

Based upon1.  Quantitative – 2023 Operating Plan

• Bank-wide goals

• Business-unit specific goals

2.  Qualitative – 2023 Strategic Imperatives

• Differentiate our compensation philosophycustomer experience

• Grow new customers / develop new markets

• Drive operational effectiveness

• Optimize our risk management infrastructure

• Be a talent and people driven organization

3.  Cascade objectives to each Executive Officer

4.  Distribute executive performance scorecards to Executive Officers

2

2nd Quarter of 2023

Succession Planning

1.  Joint meeting between the C&HC Committee and the N&G Committee to review succession plans for executive leadership roles, including Chief Executive Officer, and other key positions

3

3rd Quarter of 2023

Establish Peer Group (as advised by McLagan)

1.  Review and update peer group to be used as a reference for executive officer compensation and Board compensation

4

4th Quarter of 2023

Preliminary Review and Discussion of NEO and Other Executive Officer Competitive Market Data

1.  Review of 2023 Financial Performance including relative performance factors described above,on key financial metrics

2.  Review 2023 Risk Management Assessment

3.  Review current compensation market position based on peer market data (as advised by McLagan)

5

4th Quarter of 2023

Assess Performance Against the NCGQuantitative and Qualitative Objectives Described Above for NEOs and Other Executive Officers

1.  Evaluate performance

• C&HC Committee determined that it was appropriaterates CEO’s performance

• C&HC Committee and the CEO evaluate and rate the performance of the other Executive Officers based on performance appraisals and executive performance scorecard results

2.  Quantitative and qualitative performance is assessed based on executive performance scorecards

6

1st Quarter of 2024

Link Pay to reduce the short-term incentive pool funding by approximately 30% from 2019 funding levelsPerformance

1.  Finalize performance evaluations for NEOs and consequently reduced the amountother Executive Officers

2.  Determine final total compensation, mix of short-term incentive compensation awarded to each NEOpay and specific pay actions

• 2024 Base Salary

• 2023 STI (Paid in 2024 for the 2020 performance year:  2023 Performance)

Named Executive Officer

STI Paid in 2021

for 2020 Performance ($)

 

STI Paid in 2020

for 2019 Performance ($)

 

Percentage

Change

René F. Jones

 

750,000

 

 

1,250,000

 

 

-40

%

 

Darren J. King

 

520,000

 

 

765,000

 

 

-32

%

 

Richard S. Gold

 

598,000

 

 

880,000

 

 

-32

%

 

Kevin J. Pearson

 

598,000

 

 

880,000

 

 

-32

%

 

Doris P. Meister

 

345,000

 

 

490,000

 

 

-30

%

 

• 2024 LTI (Granted in 2024 for 2023 Performance)

48

LOGO


2023 NEO Compensation Elements

Base Salary. The C&HC Committee made 2023 base salary determinations for the NEOs in January 2023, with the exception of Mr. Bible, whose compensation was established by the C&HC Committee in December 2022, in expectation of his commencement of employment in the second quarter of 2023. At that time, given the individual performance of each of the NEOs and their respective positioning against competitive market data for their roles, the C&HC Committee determined that the base salaries for Messrs. Jones and King should be increased to continue to approach the median of market, while the remaining NEOs were deemed to be well positioned compared to market.

Named Executive Officer

  2023 Base Salary(1) ($)   Percentage Change from
2022 Base Salary
 

René F. Jones

   1,100,000    10.0

Daryl N. Bible

   740,000    n/a 

Darren J. King

   700,000    2.2

Kevin J. Pearson

   775,000    0.0

Christopher E. Kay

   725,000    0.0

Doris P. Meister

   800,000    0.0

(1)

Base salaries listed are full year salaries, and Mr. Bible’s employment began on June 1, 2023.

Variable Compensation. M&T maintains a performance-guided discretionary approach to its incentive programs. While we aim to deliver TDC in a competitive range around the median of the market for our peer group, we do not use formulas for determining performance year incentives. Instead, individual target award levels are derived using various factors including competitive market pay ranges, time in job and strategic importance of a given role to the organization. As described above, the C&HC Committee performs a holistic, balanced performance assessment of company, business unit/function and individual performance that considers quantitative and qualitative factors, market compensation levels by role, and internal equity.

The introduction of executive performance scorecards in 2023 further strengthened the link between company, business unit/function and individual performance and compensation determinations. These executive performance scorecards provide a framework to assess performance across the various positions each NEO holds and provides additional structure to apply rigor around incentive compensation recommendations. Results of the executive performance scorecards were presented to the C&HC Committee and were reviewed in conjunction with written performance appraisals to provide a holistic view of each NEO’s performance. Additional support was provided from the CRO in assessing the risk adherence for each business unit/function. Consequently, the C&HC Committee considered the following factors in making the award determinations in January 2024 for 2023 performance:

the performance of M&T during 2023 relative to its operating plan and relative to the financial peer group;

 

53


Long-term (Equity-based) Incentive Compensation

Consistent with our philosophy of linking compensation to M&T’s performance for the continued alignment with M&T’s shareholders, a substantial portion (47% to 62%) of 2019 performance year variable compensation was awarded to NEOs through discretionary grants in February 2020 of LTI compensation under the 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan.  In order to meet the varying preferences of our executives, while still aligning with shareholder values, Messrs. Gold and Pearson and Ms. Meister were provided a choice between the two LTI mixes shown below, which allocated their equity awards among three equity vehicles (Performance Hurdled Stock Units, Performance Vested Stock Units and non-qualified Stock Options)

achievement of key strategic objectives and goals set in Q1 of the performance year;

the leadership and contribution of each of the NEOs to that performance;

the performance of the business unit/function which each NEO has oversight;

effective risk management and adherence to M&T’s risk appetite statement; and

compensation peer group market data for the roles occupied by each of the NEOs.

Short-term (Cash) Incentive Compensation. Based upon the performance factors described above, as well as relevant market compensation information, the C&HC Committee determined that it was appropriate to fund the STI pool at 90% of target (with target reflecting a fully funded pool). The NCG committee established the mix for Messrs. Jones and King, ensuring that their LTI mix was most aligned with shareholder value creations and long-term performance of M&T. The NEO LTI mix awarded in February 2020 based upon 2019 performance was as follows:

 

Mr. King

Mr. Jones

Mr. Pearson

50% Performance Hurdled Stock Units

25% Performance Vested Stock Units

25% Non-qualified Stock Options

LOGO

49

 

Mr. Gold

Ms. Meister

50% Performance Hurdled Stock Units

30% Performance Vested Stock Units

20% Non-qualified Stock Options

The NCG


Applying the executive performance scorecard results, including individual performance ratings, the C&HC Committee consequently set the amount of STI awards to each NEO for the 2023 performance year as follows:

Named Executive Officer

  2023 STI ($)   Percentage Change
from 2022 STI
 

René F. Jones

   2,150,000    -10

Daryl N. Bible

   750,000    n/a 

Darren J. King

   1,350,000    23

Kevin J. Pearson

   1,300,000    -13

Christopher E. Kay

   950,000    -5

Doris P. Meister

   750,000    -21

Long-term (Equity-based) Incentive Compensation. Consistent with our philosophy of linking compensation to M&T’s performance for the continued alignment with M&T’s shareholders, a substantial portion (60% to 71%) of 2022 performance year variable compensation was awarded to NEOs through LTI grants in January 2023 under the 2019 Equity Plan, excluding Mr. Bible, as he was not employed at the time of the 2023 LTI grant. The C&HC Committee established the LTI compensation mix to maximize shareholder value and tie the NEOs’ compensation to M&T’s long-term performance. The NEO LTI mix awarded in January 2023 based upon 2022 performance was 40% Performance Hurdled Stock Units (PHSUs), 40% Performance Vested Stock Units (PVSUs) and 20% Non-Qualified Stock Options (NQ Stock Options or stock options). All of the LTI awards are fully at risk as stock options are worthless without stock appreciation and the PHSUs are subject to annual performance hurdles with no downside protection (i.e., they vest at target or not at all). Going forward, M&T will continue to monitor, evaluate, and modify this program as deemed necessary to ensure continued evolution in line with our business strategy and compensation philosophy.

The C&HC Committee determined the dollar value of the LTI awards to be made to the NEOs at its meeting in January 2023. Following that meeting, the 2022 performance year equity awards were granted on January 31, 2023. In light of a gap to competitive market positioning, the C&HC Committee determined that an increase in the dollar value of the LTI awards to be awarded for 2022 performance was warranted for all NEOs.

Named Executive Officer(1)

  2022 Performance
Year LTI Awards
(2023 Grant)
($)
   2022
Performance
Year Options
(20%) ($)
   2022
Performance
Year PHSUs
(40%) ($)
   2022
Performance
Year PVSUs
(40%) ($)
 

René F. Jones

   6,000,000    1,200,000    2,400,000    2,400,000 

Darren J. King

   2,000,000    400,000    800,000    800,000 

Kevin J. Pearson

   2,500,000    500,000    1,000,000    1,000,000 

Christopher E. Kay

   1,475,000    295,000    590,000    590,000 

Doris P. Meister

   1,750,000    350,000    700,000    700,000 

(1)

Mr. Bible was not yet employed by M&T at the dollar valuetime of the LTI awards to be made to the NEOs at its meeting in February of 2020.  Following that meeting, the equity awards were granted on February 5, 2020.  In light of a gap to competitive market positioning, the Committee determined that an increase in the dollar value of the LTI awards to be awarded in February 2020 was warranted for Messrs. Jones, King, Gold and Pearson as compared to the dollar value of the LTI awards awarded in January 2019. As Ms. Meister is already well positioned from a TDC and LTI perspective, her award was flat to the prior year.these grants.

Performance Hurdled Stock Units (“PHSUs”) were granted as part of the LTI mix in 2020, consistent with prior years.  PHSUs will vest ratably at target over three years based on absolute ROTCE performance.  If the performance requirement is not satisfied for a given period, the portion of the stock award that is scheduled to vest on the vesting date immediately following that performance period will not vest and will be forfeited unless otherwise determined by the NCG Committee.

M&T reintroduced stock options for executive officers, including the NEOs, in 2018 and gave a portion of the 2019 performance year LTI awards in the form of stock options as well.  Vesting of the stock option awards granted to the NEOs in 2020 is scheduled to occur on a graduated basis with 33% vesting on February 5, 2021, an additional 33% vesting on February 5, 2022 and the remaining 34% vesting on February 5, 2023.  Stock options create close alignment with shareholder experience, and due to their ten-year term, support M&T’s business strategy and compensation philosophy by providing a link to long-term business objectives and sustained long-term value creation.

PHSUs. PHSUs are utilized as a retention vehicle and were granted as part of the LTI mix in January 2023 for the 2022 plan year, consistent with prior years. PHSUs vest ratably at target each year over three years based on achievement of an absolute ROTCE safety and soundness performance hurdle for each year, which has been established at 5%. If the performance hurdle is not satisfied for a given year, the portion of the stock award that is scheduled to vest on the vesting date immediately following that annual performance period will not vest and will be forfeited unless otherwise determined by the C&HC Committee. Any dividend equivalents credited during the annual performance period are accrued and paid in cash to the extent the PHSUs vest and are distributed.

 

54
50

LOGO


2021-2023 PHSU Award Payouts.At the conclusion of the annual performance period for the PHSU grants made in 2021, 2022 and 2023, the company’s ROTCE was calculated to be 17.6%, which was above the absolute threshold required for each tranche to vest and pay out at target (100%). The C&HC Committee certified the payout at its meeting in January 2024. See Appendix A for a description of how ROTCE is calculated.

Named Executive Officer(1)

    Grant Date   Target Award    Distributed Performance Adjusted Shares 

René F. Jones

     1/29/21   4,278     4,278 
      1/31/22   3,129     3,129 
      1/31/23   5,128     5,128 

Darren J. King

     1/29/21   1,405     1,405 
      1/31/22   827     827 
      1/31/23   1,709     1,709 

Kevin J. Pearson

     1/29/21   2,328     2,328 
      1/31/22   1,417     1,417 
      1/31/23   2,136     2,136 

Christopher E. Kay

     1/29/21   1,888     1,888 
      1/31/22   768     768 
      1/31/23   1,260     1,260 

Doris P. Meister

     1/29/21   1,168     1,168 
      1/31/22   685     685 
      1/31/23   1,495     1,495 

 

(1)


Mr. Bible did not receive a grant of PHSUs in 2021, 2022 or 2023 as he was not yet employed by M&T believes that great companies are always adapting and evolving, andat the NCG Committee sought to strengthen the link between company performance and executive compensation.  To this end, in 2019, the NCG Committee continued to diversify the LTI portfolio by adding PVSUs for executive officers (including NEOs).  PVSUs willtime of these grants.

PVSUs. The C&HC Committee also grants PVSUs, which cliff vest after three years based on absolute and relative average ROTCE performance over the three-year performance period, with final payout values ranging from 0% to 150% of target. In addition, the PVSUs have accrued reinvested dividend equivalent units, which will pay out at the time the underlying shares vest and are subject to the same performance payout percentage.

PVSU Performance Metrics(1)  Absolute
ROTCE
  Payout  Relative
ROTCE
  Payout(2)
Above Absolute Maximum – payout is 150% regardless of relative performance  ≥17%  150%  N/A  150%
     
Performance between these two Absolute ROTCE levels is assessed relative to the peer group  5% to < 17%  Payout by relative ROTCE Scale  

>75th %’ile

50th %’ile

25th %’ile

<25th %’ile

  150%

100%

75%

50%

Below Absolute Threshold – payout is zero, regardless of relative performance  < 5%  0%  N/A  0%

(1)

See Appendix A for a description of how ROTCE is calculated and a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with corresponding non-GAAP amounts.

(2)

For performance between the 25th and 75th percentiles, payout will be determined based on straight-line interpolation.

LOGO

51


2021-2023 PVSU Award Payout. At the conclusion of the three-year performance period for the 2021 PVSU grant, the company’s three-year average ROTCE was calculated to be 17.0%, which yielded a 150% payout. The C&HC Committee certified the payout at its meeting in February 2024. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with corresponding non-GAAP amounts for the 2021-2023 ROTCE calculations.

Year

    ROTCE(1) (%)     Earn out (%) 
   

2021

     16.8        
   

2022

     16.7        
   

2023

     17.6        
   

Three-Year Avg.

     17.0      150

(1)

See Appendix A for a description of how ROTCE is calculated and a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with corresponding non-GAAP amounts.

Named Executive Officer(1)

  2021 Target Award   Distributed Performance Adjusted Shares(2) 
   

René F. Jones

   12,834    21,284 
   

Darren J. King

   4,213    6,986 
   

Kevin J. Pearson

   6,982    11,579 
   

Doris P. Meister

   3,503    5,809 

(1)

Messrs. Bible and Kay did not receive a grant of PVSUs in 2021.

(2)

Earned PVSUs includes payout of underlying Dividend Equivalent Units (DEUs). The DEUs are also subject to the same performance payout percentage.

PVSU Performance Metrics

Absolute ROTCE

Payout

Relative ROTCE

Payout(1)

Above Absolute Maximum – payout is 150% regardless of relative performance

≥17%

150%

N/A

150%

Performance between these two Absolute ROTCE gatekeepers is assessed relative to the peer group

5% to < 17 %

Payout by relative ROTCE Scale

>75th %’ile

50th %’ile

25th %’ile

<25th %’ile

150%

100%

75%

50%

Below Absolute Threshold – payout is zero, regardless of relative performance

< 5%

0%

N/A

0%

(1)

For performance between the 25th and 75th percentiles, payout will be determined based on straight-line interpolation.earnout percentage of 150% as approved by the C&HC Committee. The earned DEUs for the NEOs are as follows: Mr. Jones 2,033, Mr. King 667, Mr. Pearson 1,106 and Ms. Meister 554.

Stock Options. M&T also awards a portion of the 2022 performance year LTI awards in the form of stock options. Stock options align our NEOs’ interests with those of shareholders by providing value only if M&T’s stock price increases from the date that the stock option is granted. In addition, the vesting schedule for the stock options promotes retention of our NEOs. The stock option awards granted to the NEOs in January 2023 for 2022 performance vest ratably over three years. Stock options create close alignment with shareholder experience, and due to their ten-year term, support M&T’s business strategy and compensation philosophy by providing a link to long-term business objectives and sustained long-term value creation.

2024 Long-Term Incentive Grant.

Each year the C&HC Committee evaluates the LTI mix to maintain competitiveness, drive appropriate behaviors and align the interests of our executives with M&T’s long-term performance. To further strengthen the link between company performance and executive compensation, in 2023 the C&HC Committee increased the percentage of the award granted in the form of PVSUs and decreased the other two vehicles. The NEO LTI mix awarded in January 2024 based upon 2023 performance was:

50% Performance-Vested Stock Units

35% Performance-Hurdled Stock Units

 

For the 202015% Non-Qualified Stock Options

Named Executive Officer(1)

 2023 Performance
Year LTI Awards
(2024 Grant)
($)
  Percentage
Change from
2022
Performance
Year LTI
  2023
Performance
Year Options
(15%) ($)
  2023
Performance
Year PHSUs
(35%) ($)
  2023
Performance
Year PVSUs
(50%) ($)
 

René F. Jones

  6,000,000   0  900,000   2,100,000   3,000,000 

Daryl N. Bible

  2,125,000   n/a   318,750   743,750   1,062,500 

Darren J. King

  2,200,000   10  330,000   770,000   1,100,000 

Kevin J. Pearson

  2,500,000   0  375,000   875,000   1,250,000 

Christopher E. Kay

  1,500,000   2  225,000   525,000   750,000 

(1)

Ms. Meister did not receive a 2024 LTI grant PVSUs represent 15%in light of the CEO’s 2019 performance year TDC, andher upcoming transition to a range of 12% to 17% for the other NEOs.  While M&T has historically utilized long-term performance share units, this is only M&T’s second use of 3-year cliff vested performance share units with variable payouts based on performance.  As the entire award is fully at risk (i.e., below 5% ROTCE, the payout is zero), the NCG Committee felt there should be a higher payout floor to balance the risk and promote retention.  All of the LTI awards are fully at risk as stock options are worthless without stock appreciation and the PHSUs are subject to annual performance hurdles with no downside protection (i.e., they vest at target or not at all).  Going forward, M&T will continue to monitor, evaluate, and modify this program as needed to ensure continued evolution in line with our business strategy and compensation philosophy.consulting role.

52

 

In light of a continued gap to competitive market positioning, the NCG Committee again determined additional LTI awards were warranted for Messrs. Jones, King, Gold and Pearson for their 2021 (2020 performance year) grant. To ensure continued alignment with shareholders and bank performance, increases in TDC to move toward a more competitive position compared to market were delivered in LTI. As Ms. Meister is already well positioned from a TDC and LTI perspective, her 2021 (2020 performance year) award was flat to 2020 (2019 performance year) grant value.

Named Executive Officer

2020 Performance Year LTI Awards (2021 Grant) (1) ($)

 

2019 Performance Year LTI Awards (2020 Grant) ($)

 

Percentage

Change 2020 vs.

2019

 

René F. Jones (2)

 

4,250,000

 

 

3,550,000

 

 

20

%

Darren J. King (2)

 

1,395,000

 

 

1,320,000

 

 

6

%

Richard S. Gold (3)

 

2,312,000

 

 

2,155,000

 

 

7

%

Kevin J. Pearson (3)

 

2,312,000

 

 

2,155,000

 

 

7

%

Doris P. Meister (3)

 

1,160,000

 

 

1,160,000

 

 

0

%

(1)

In determining these amounts, the NCG Committee considered competitive market data as well as company and individual performance.

(2)

For 2021, the NCG Committee determined that Mr. Jones’ and Mr. King’s LTI be comprised of 40% PVSU/20% NQ Stock Options/40% PHSU.

(3)

NEOs other than the CEO and CFO were provided a choice for their LTI mix between vehicles.  LTI mix choices provided were: 40% PVSUs/20% NQ Stock Options/40% PHSUs or 35% PVSUs/25% NQ Stock Options/40% PHSUs. All remaining NEOs chose 40% PVSUs/20% NQ Stock Options/40% PHSUs.LOGO


2024 PVSUs. The C&HC Committee approved a plan design change for the PVSUs granted in 2024. This updated plan maintains a three-year cliff vesting schedule, but now includes two metrics – ROTCE and Return on Tangible Assets (“ROTA”). Both metrics are weighted equally (50% each) and both take into consideration the three-year average performance on an absolute and relative basis. Final payout values range from 0% to 150% of target. In addition, the updated PVSU design maintains the accrued reinvested dividend equivalent units, which will payout at the time the underlying shares vest and are subject to the same performance payout percentage.

   PVSU Performance Metric 1  Absolute
ROTCE
  Payout  Relative
ROTCE
  Payout(2)

Metric 1:

ROTCE(1)

 

50% weighting

 Above Absolute Maximum – payout is 150% regardless of relative performance  ≥17%  150%  N/A  150%
 Performance between these two Absolute ROTCE levels is assessed relative to the peer group  5% to < 17%  Payout by relative ROTCE Scale  

>75th %’ile

50th %’ile

25th %’ile

<25th %’ile

  150%

100%

75%

50%

 Below Absolute Threshold – payout is zero, regardless of relative performance  < 5%  0%  N/A  0%

(1)

See Appendix A for a description of how ROTCE is calculated.

(2)

For performance between the 25th and 75th percentiles, payout will be determined based on straight-line interpolation.

   PVSU Performance Metric 2  Absolute
ROTA
  Payout  Relative
ROTA
  Payout(2)

Metric 2:

ROTA(1)

 

50% weighting

 Above Absolute Maximum – payout is 150% regardless of relative performance  ≥1.25%  150%  N/A  150%
 Performance between these two Absolute ROTA levels is assessed relative to the peer group  0.35% to < 1.25%  Payout by relative ROTA Scale  

>75th %’ile

50th %’ile

25th %’ile

<25th %’ile

  150%

100%

75%

50%

 Below Absolute Threshold – payout is zero, regardless of relative performance  < 0.35%  0%  N/A  0%

(1)

See Appendix A for a description of how ROTA is calculated.

(2)

For performance between the 25th and 75th percentiles, payout will be determined based on straight-line interpolation.

LOGO

53


Individual Performance Assessments

The C&HC Committee assessed the performance of each NEO based on the factors described in the “Process for Determining 2023 NEO Compensation” section above, and against our 2023 strategic imperatives, as well as each NEO’s individual performance goals, as more fully described below. In addition, the C&HC Committee also considers market-competitive compensation levels in determining each NEO’s TDC.

René F. Jones

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

LOGO

Mr. Jones completed his sixth year as Chairman and CEO in 2023. The C&HC Committee established Mr. Jones’ TDC based on the company’s performance relative to peers and our 2023 Operating Plan (including metrics that were missed), as well as progress toward our long-term strategic objectives. Specifically, the C&HC Committee considered the following performance factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Mr. Jones’ TDC:

• Business results/shareholder return

¡  Diluted EPS was $15.79, up 37% from $11.53 in 2022

¡  Operating EPS* was $16.08, up 12% from $14.42 in 2022

¡  Return on Average Tangible Assets* was 1.42%, up from 1.35% in 2022

¡  GAAP-basis net income totaled $2.74 billion, up from $1.99 billion in 2022

¡  Increased quarterly common stock dividend per share 8% during 2023 from $1.20 to $1.30, representing the 7th year of consecutive increases

¡  Notwithstanding strong performance relative to peer group, performance on diluted net operating earnings per common share, net operating return on average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity were below Operating Plan

• Optimizing use of resources/increasing resiliency

¡  Established workstreams to optimize community bank coverage, enterprise contact and enterprise operations

¡  Enhanced system resiliency including continued improvements in cybersecurity

• Risk management

¡  Executed Commercial Bank’s strategy

¡  Made significant talent investment in second- and third-line risk capabilities

¡  Successfully divested from two businesses to align portfolio with the bank’s risk profile

¡  Company continues to operate within its established risk appetite parameters as affirmed by the Risk Committee of the Board

• Strategic partnerships

¡  Serves on Federal Reserve Bank of New York Board of Directors for three-year term ending December 31, 2024

¡  Serves on the Board (Vice Chair) of the Bank Policy Institute

54

LOGO


• Talent
¡  Concluded year one of internal sponsorship program to
strengthen pipeline of diverse leaders
¡  Continued focus on succession plans to support continuity
and increase diversity
¡  Continued to mature our pay-for-performance practice and
culture
*  See “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the 2023 Form 10-K for
a reconciliation GAAP amounts with these corresponding
non-GAAP amounts

   Performance Year 
       2022         2023    

Salary

  $1,000,000   $1,100,000 

STI Payout

  $2,400,000   $2,150,000 

NQ Stock Options 

  $1,200,000   $900,000 

PHSUs(1)

  $2,400,000   $2,100,000 

PVSUs(2)

  $2,400,000   $3,000,000 

LTI Grant 

  $6,000,000   $6,000,000 

Total Direct Compensation

  $9,400,000   $9,250,000 

(1) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout dependent on achievement of performance hurdle.

(2) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

Linking 2023 CEO Pay Elements to Performance

Over 88% variable pay for the 2023 performance year

Over 65% of variable pay is equity-based deferred LTI subject to multi-year vesting and forfeiture to align shareholder and executive interests

NQ Stock Options vest ratably over three years and provide value only if M&T’s stock price increases from the date that the options are granted

PHSUs vest ratably over three years and are earned based on achievement of an absolute ROTCE performance hurdle each year

PVSUs are earned only to the extent M&T performance is achieved against absolute and relative average ROTCE and ROTA over a three-year period

LOGO

55


Daryl Bible

Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

55


Individual Performance AssessmentsLOGO

The NCG Committee assessed the performance of each NEO based on the factors described in the “Process for Determining 2020 NEO Compensation” section above, and against our 2020 Strategic Imperatives, as described below.  In addition to the assessment2023 performance
year compensation that was delivered to
Mr. Bible, upon his joining of M&T,
Mr. Bible received a cash bonus of
$500,000 (less taxes) which will be
forfeitable by Mr. Bible should he
separate from M&T within one year, and
an award of restricted stock units valued
at $2,500,000, which will vest ratably
over three years subject to continued
employment.

Having joined in June 2023 and served as CFO for the second half of 2023, Mr. Bible brought experienced leadership, guidance and insight into critical corporate performance measurements. Additionally, the C&HC Committee considered the following performance factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Mr. Bible’s TDC:

• Business results/shareholder return

¡  Diluted EPS was $15.79, up 37% from $11.53 in 2022

¡  Operating EPS* was $16.08, up 12% from $14.42 in 2022

¡  Return on Average Tangible Assets* was 1.42%, up from 1.35% in 2022

¡  GAAP-basis net income totaled $2.74 billion, up from $1.99 billion in 2022

¡  Increased quarterly common stock dividend per share 8% during 2023 from $1.20 to $1.30, representing the 7th year of consecutive increases

¡  Notwithstanding strong performance relative to peer group, performance on diluted net operating earnings per common share, net operating return on average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity were below Operating Plan

• Enhanced processes and communication

¡  Stood up quarterly regulatory meetings and deepened representation to improve outreach

¡  Improved resource allocation and governance of key enterprise initiatives

• Finance modernization

¡  Brought in experienced talent to accelerate transformation

¡  Worked with Technology and Operations to drive agile ways of working

¡  Enhanced Data Governance Framework, including automation of data risk and controls

• Risk Management

¡  Collaborated with Risk and Line of Businesses to formulate a balanced strategy and targeted objectives for CRE concentration changes

*  See “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the 2023 Form 10-K for a reconciliation GAAP amounts with these corresponding non-GAAP amounts

   Performance Year(1) 
    

 Target Comp 

2023

   

 Actual Comp 

2023(2)

 

Salary

  $740,000   $418,385 

STI Payout

  $1,200,000   $750,000 

NQ Stock Options 

  $318,750   $318,750 

PHSUs(3)

  $743,750   $743,750 

PVSUs(4)

  $1,062,500   $1,062,500 

LTI Grant 

  $2,125,000   $2,125,000 

Total Direct Compensation

  $4,065,000   $3,293,385 

(1) Mr. Bible’s 2022 Performance Compensation is not listed as he was not employed for the 2022 performance year.

(2) Represents a pro-rated base salary due to Mr. Bible’s mid-year start date.

(3) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout dependent upon achievement of performance hurdle.

(4) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

56

LOGO


Darren J. King

Senior Executive Vice President and Co-Head of Businesses

LOGO

As CFO for the first half of 2023, Mr. King directed the company’s strong financial performance. Upon assuming leadership of our Consumer Bank portfolio, Mr. King led continued strong results in the Retail, Business Banking, Mortgage Banking and Dealer Services businesses. For the 2023 performance year, the C&HC Committee considered the mixed results of the variousportfolio of businesses he oversees and the following performance factors, described above,including an expanded role (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Mr. King’s TDC:

• Business results/shareholder return

¡  Diluted EPS was $15.79, up 37% from $11.53 in 2022

¡  Operating EPS* was $16.08, up 12% from $14.42 in 2022

¡  Return on Average Tangible Assets* was 1.42%, up from 1.35% in 2022

¡  GAAP-basis net income totaled $2.74 billion, up from $1.99 billion in 2022

¡  Increased quarterly common stock dividend per share 8% during 2023 from $1.20 to $1.30, representing the NCG Committee also considers market-competitive compensation7th year of consecutive increases

¡  In addition, our Retail business saw year-over-year increases in determining each NEO’s TDC.  Net Customer Growth, Revenue Growth, Net Income, as well as on ROTCE

René F. Jones¡  Notwithstanding strong performance relative to peer group, performance on diluted net operating earnings per common share, net operating return on average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity were below Operating Plan

   Chairman• Risk management

¡  Maintained and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Jones completed his third full year as Chairman and CEO in 2020.  In light of relatively strong company performance and his relatively low TDC positioning, the NCG Committee increased Mr. Jones’ TDC to a slightly more competitive position for the 2020 performance year. Notably, Mr. Jones received a 40% reduction in his STI award (with pool funding down approximately 30%) and his entire increase in compensation was delivered in PVSUs, ensuring continued alignment with shareholders and bank performance. The NCG Committee remains focused on moving his TDC to a more competitive position over the next few years, while also considering company performance and Mr. Jones’ individual performance. For performance year 2020, the NCG Committee considered the following factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Mr. Jones’ TDC:

     Delivered Shareholder Value

o     Reported top quartile Return on Average Tangible Assets (“ROATA”), ROTCE and Net Interest Margin (“NIM”) of peers

o     Diluted net operating earnings per common share resulting in year-over-year change better than peer median

     Drove Business Results

o     Top ranked efficiency ratio among peers which was critical given the economic conditions in 2020

     Continued Focus on Risk Management

o     Risk Committee consistently affirmed Company is operating within its risk appetite despite the on-going pandemic

     Differentiated Customer Experience / Drive Operational Effectiveness

o     Implemented initiatives to enhance and differentiate the customer experience to be more responsive to client needs

     Talent & People Driven Organization

o     Continued investment in attracting, developing and promoting diverse talent

 

 

Performance Year

 

 

2019

2020

 

Salary

$950,000

$1,000,000

 

STI

$1,250,000

$750,000

 

NQ Stock Options

$887,500

$850,000

 

PHSUs

$1,775,000

$1,700,000

 

PVSUs (1)

$887,500

$1,700,000

 

LTI

$3,550,000

$4,250,000

 

Total Direct Compensation

$5,750,000

$6,000,000

 

(1) Represents target amount. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

Linking 2020 CEO Pay Elementsenhanced controls to Performanceensure accuracy in SEC/Reg reporting

Over 80% variable pay¡  Organized and led cross-business unit calls during market liquidity events, overseeing changes designed to preserve (then grow) our diverse deposit base

• Successful transition

¡  Facilitated seamless transition to new CFO, including joint meetings with analysts and investors to maintain continuity

¡  Partnered with Mr. Pearson to jointly lead entire business portfolio in alignment with the bank’s strategic priorities

*  See “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the 2023 Form 10-K for 2020

Over 70% of variable pay is equity-based deferred LTI subject to multi-year vesting and forfeiture to align stockholder and executive interests

PVSUs are earned only to the extent M&T performance is achieved against absolute and relative ROTCE over a 3-year period
reconciliation GAAP amounts with these corresponding non-GAAP amounts

 

56
   Performance Year 
       2022         2023    

Salary

  $685,000   $700,000 

STI Payout

  $1,100,000   $1,350,000 

NQ Stock Options 

  $400,000   $330,000 

PHSUs(1)

  $800,000   $770,000 

PVSUs(2)

  $800,000   $1,100,000 

LTI Grant 

  $2,000,000   $2,200,000 

Total Direct Compensation

  $3,785,000   $4,250,000 

(1) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout dependent on achievement of performance hurdle.

(2) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

 

LOGO

57


Kevin J. Pearson

Vice Chairman and Co-Head of Businesses

LOGO

Mr. Pearson has overall responsibility for M&T’s Commercial Bank, as well as our Wealth and Institutional Client Services divisions under the Wilmington Trust brand. For performance year 2023, the C&HC Committee considered the mixed results of the portfolio of businesses he oversees and the following performance factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing his TDC:

• Business results/shareholder return

¡  Diluted EPS was $15.79, up 37% from $11.53 in 2022

¡  Operating EPS* was $16.08, up 12% from $14.42 in 2022

¡  Return on Average Tangible Assets* was 1.42%, up from 1.35% in 2022

¡  GAAP-basis net income totaled $2.74 billion, up from $1.99 billion in 2022

¡  Increased quarterly common stock dividend per share 8% during 2023 from $1.20 to $1.30, representing the 7th year of consecutive increases

¡  In addition, revenue growth for Commercial, Wealth and Institutional Client Services divisions each increased year-over-year

¡  Notwithstanding strong performance relative to peer group, performance on diluted net operating earnings per common share, net operating return on average tangible assets, and net operating return on average tangible common equity were below Operating Plan

• Risk Management

¡  Executed Commercial Bank’s strategy

¡  Mobilized resources to accelerate transformation of the Bank’s commercial credit administration processes

• Talent

¡  Supported executive level hires and moves to improve resiliency and operational effectiveness of the Commercial Bank

¡  Partnered with Mr. King to jointly lead all businesses in alignment with bank priorities

*  See “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the 2023 Form 10-K for a reconciliation GAAP amounts with these corresponding non-GAAP amounts

   Performance Year 
       2022         2023    

Salary

  $775,000   $775,000 

STI Payout

  $1,500,000   $1,300,000 

NQ Stock Options 

  $500,000   $375,000 

PHSUs(1)

  $1,000,000   $875,000 

PVSUs(2)

  $1,000,000   $1,250,000 

LTI Grant 

  $2,500,000   $2,500,000 

Total Direct Compensation

  $4,775,000   $4,575,000 

(1) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout dependent upon achievement of performance hurdle.

(2) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

58

LOGO


Christopher E. Kay

Senior Executive Vice President and Head of Enterprise Platforms

LOGO

Mr. Kay assumed responsibility as the head of the company’s Enterprise Platforms in June 2023, focusing on accelerating scale in key enterprise functions. At that time, Mr. Kay transitioned responsibility for Consumer, Business Banking and Mortgage. For performance year 2023, the C&HC Committee considered the following performance factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Mr. Kay’s TDC:

• Business Results

¡  Through Q2 2023, increased revenue for the retail portfolio

¡  Managed liquidity daily with real-time adjustments to balance ILST (Internal Liquidity Stress Test) standard levels and estimate short term liquidity risk

¡  Sponsored initiatives to optimize use of resources (revenue and efficiency)

• Talent

¡  Hired and onboarded new head of digital banking; assisted development and execution of the organization’s digital modernization efforts

¡  Sponsored leadership to create and implement durable and flexible operating/technology model with greater customer centricity

• Risk management

¡  Led communications and readiness planning for bank initiatives

¡  Established governance routines to increase transparency

   Performance Year 
       2022         2023    

Salary

  $725,000   $725,000 

STI Payout

  $1,000,000   $950,000 

NQ Stock Options 

  $295,000   $225,000 

PHSUs(1)

  $590,000   $525,000 

PVSUs(2)

  $590,000   $750,000 

LTI Grant 

  $1,475,000   $1,500,000 

Total Direct Compensation

  $3,200,000   $3,175,000 

(1) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout dependent upon achievement of performance hurdle.

(2) Represents grant date fair value. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

LOGO

59


Doris P. Meister

Senior Executive Vice President and Head of Wealth Management

For performance year 2023, the C&HC Committee considered the following performance factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Ms. Meister’s TDC:

Business Results

¡

Despite the regional bank crisis in early 2023, the company’s Wealth Management business was able to maintain a client retention score of 97% while Net Promoter Scores improved

¡


Darren J. King

Executive Vice PresidentNet customer growth and Chief Financial Officerrevenue growth were both up year-over-year

¡

Wealth Management missed on its net contribution versus the Operating Plan primarily due to lower net interest income, caused in part by the sharp increase in deposit costs and lower than planned balances

Growth and productivity

¡

Implemented new High Net Worth Growth strategy to further scale the wealth business

¡

Accelerated the cross-sell program with the Commercial Bank, including introducing our largest People’s United commercial clients to our wealth capabilities

¡

Streamlined operating processes, intended to reduce cycle time and improve advisory productivity

¡

Streamlined fiduciary business process and created rapid response team to handle complex trusts

Talent

¡

Externally hired and internally promoted key talent

   Performance Year 
       2023(1)     

Salary

  $800,000 

STI Payout

  $750,000 

LTI Grant(2)

  $0 

Total Direct Compensation

  $1,550,000 

(1) Ms. Meister’s 2022 Performance Compensation is not listed as she was not an NEO for 2022.

(2) Ms. Meister did not receive an LTI grant in 2024 in light of her upcoming transition to a consulting role as described below.

Ms. Meister’s Retirement and Consulting Agreement.On February 9, 2024, M&T and Ms. Meister entered into a Retirement and Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”) in connection with Ms. Meister’s transition to a consulting role with the company, which will be effective on or about May 31, 2024. In order to ensure a smooth and effective transition of leadership of our wealth management business, pursuant to the Agreement, Ms. Meister will provide consulting services for a period of 24 months from Ms. Meister’s last day of employment. As consideration for her provision of consulting services, Ms. Meister will receive subject to her execution and non-revocation of the Agreement (including a general release therein), as well as her compliance with non-solicitation and non-compete covenants, a monthly consulting fee of $101,666.66.

Ms. Meister’s outstanding equity awards will vest pursuant to the existing terms of her award agreements with respect to retirement eligibility as follows: (i) all vesting restrictions on outstanding PHSU awards will lapse; (ii) outstanding PVSU awards remain subject to the company’s actual performance and will be paid on the original schedule for such awards after the applicable performance, and (iii) all NQ Stock Options continue to vest pursuant to their original schedule and the exercise period ends on the earlier of 4 years following retirement or the original 10 year expiration date. In light of her upcoming shift to a consulting role, Ms. Meister did not receive an LTI award in 2024.

 

 

 

 

 

As CFO, Mr. King oversaw M&T’s continued growth (compared to peers) in net income and EPS.  Additionally, for performance year 2020, the NCG Committee considered the following factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Mr. King’s TDC, which reflects a reduction in the bankwide STI pool:

     Delivered Shareholder Value

o     Reported top quartile ROATA, ROTCE and NIM of peers

o     Diluted net operating earnings per common share resulting in year-over-year change better than peer median

     Drove Business Results

o     Top ranked efficiency ratio among peers, which was critical given the economic conditions in 2020

     Optimized Risk Management Infrastructure

o     Ensured appropriate control environment exists and aligned processes to better understand financial risks to mitigate

     Differentiated Customer Experience / Drive Operational Effectiveness

o     Improved reporting timeliness and value to business partners to provide a deeper level of business insight

     Talent & People Driven Organization

o     Continued investment in attracting, developing and promoting diverse talent

 

 

Performance Year

 

 

2019

2020

 

Salary

$670,000

$685,000

 

STI

$765,000

$520,000

 

NQ Stock Options

$330,000

$279,000

 

PHSUs

$660,000

$558,000

 

PVSUs (1)

$330,000

$558,000

 

LTI

$1,320,000

$1,395,000

 

Total Direct Compensation

$2,755,000

$2,600,000

 

(1) Represents target amount. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

60

 

LOGO


57


Richard S. Gold

President and Chief Operating Officer

Retirement and Other Benefits

M&T maintains two tax-qualified retirement plans for its employees, one a defined benefit plan and the other a defined contribution plan. Mr. Pearson participates in the defined benefit plan and continues to receive benefit accruals. Messrs. Jones and King elected to have their benefits accrued under the defined contribution plan. This election was made pursuant to a one-time election that was offered to all participants in the defined benefit plan in late 2005 to either (i) remain an active participant in the defined benefit plan and earn future benefits under a new reduced benefit formula or (ii) retain the frozen benefit in the defined benefit plan and earn future benefits under a new defined contribution plan formula beginning January 1, 2006. Ms. Meister and Messrs. Kay and Bible are not eligible to participate in the defined benefit plan and are participants in the defined contribution plan.

In addition, M&T maintains nonqualified defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans to supplement retirement benefits for the NEOs in order to make up for benefits that cannot be provided in the qualified plans due to Internal Revenue Code limits; however, compensation recognized for the purpose of these plans is capped at two times the annual Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit. The nonqualified plans are not funded, except as benefits are actually paid to executive officers upon retirement or such other date elected by the executive. Additional information regarding these retirement plans and arrangements is provided in the sections titled “Pension Benefits” and “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”

M&T does not provide the NEOs with severance packages beyond what is provided to employees of M&T, generally. Consequently, the NEOs have historically participated in the M&T Bank Corporation Employee Severance Pay Plan (“Severance Pay Plan”), which provides for post-employment severance payments that are tiered based upon an employee’s position and years of service, and the continuation of certain employee benefits. Upon a “Qualifying Event” (defined in the Severance Pay Plan as any permanent, involuntary termination of a participant’s active employment as a result of a reduction in force, restructuring, outsourcing or elimination of position), a NEO would be entitled to benefits under the Severance Pay Plan.

Other than benefits that are generally available to our employees, M&T does not maintain any individual executive severance or change in control arrangements. M&T’s compensation plans do not contain payments or benefits to NEOs that are specifically triggered by a change in control, except that the 2019 Equity Plan provides that, upon a change in control, all employees, including the NEOs, would become fully vested in any outstanding awards that were not already vested. M&T has elected to provide such acceleration because of a belief that the principal purpose of providing executive officers and other employees with equity incentives is to align their interests with those of M&T’s shareholders and that this alignment should be enhanced, not weakened, in the context of a change in control. Accelerating the vesting of equity-based compensation upon a change in control allows our employees the same opportunity as other shareholders to sell shares freely following the completion of the transaction and realize the economic benefits of such transaction, without forcing them to be exposed to the post-closing performance of the acquirer. More information regarding severance benefits and the impact of a change in control can be found later in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section.

Perquisites. Generally, M&T provides limited perquisites to its NEOs. The perquisites that are provided are designed to assist NEOs in being productive and are limited to those that management and the C&HC Committee believe are consistent with M&T’s overall compensation philosophy. Given the importance of developing business relationships for M&T’s success, the NEOs are generally reimbursed for certain initiation fees and dues they incur for club memberships deemed advisable for business purposes, tax preparation, parking, meals and executive physical examinations.

 

 

 

 

As President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Gold oversees the Business Banking, Consumer Banking, Enterprise Transformation, Human Resources and Legal Divisions.  For performance year 2020, the NCG Committee considered the following factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Mr. Gold’s TDC, which reflects a reduction in the bankwide STI pool:

     Delivered Shareholder Value

o     Reported top quartile ROATA, ROTCE and NIM of peers

o     Diluted net operating earnings per common share resulting in year-over-year change better than peer median

     Drove Business Results

o     Top ranked efficiency ratio among peers, which was critical given the economic conditions in 2020

     Continued Focus on Risk Management

o     Risk Committee consistently affirmed bank is operating within its risk appetite despite the on-going pandemic

     Differentiated Customer Experience / Drive Operational Effectiveness

o     Executed large scale reassignment of employees to areas with staffing needs as a result of the pandemic

o     Maintained an Outstanding Community Reinvestment Act rating

     Talent & People Driven Organization

o     Continued investment in attracting, developing and promoting diverse talent

o     Facilitated the development of Leadership Competencies and Attributes

 

 

Performance Year

 

 

2019

2020

 

Salary

$745,000

$765,000

 

STI

$880,000

$598,000

 

NQ Stock Options

$431,000

$462,400

 

PHSUs

$1,077,500

$924,800

 

PVSUs (1)

$646,500

$924,800

 

LTI

$2,155,000

$2,312,000

 

Total Direct Compensation

$3,780,000

$3,675,000

 

(1) Represents target amount. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

 

LOGO

58

 


Kevin J. Pearson

Vice Chairman

61

 

 

 

 

As Vice Chairman, Mr. Pearson maintains overall responsibility for M&T’s Commercial, Credit, Technology and Banking Operations and Wealth and Institutional Services Divisions.  For performance year 2020 (during which Mr. Pearson served as an Executive Vice President of M&T), the NCG Committee considered the following factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing his TDC, which reflects a reduction in the bankwide STI pool:

     Delivered Shareholder Value

o     Reported top quartile ROATA, ROTCE and NIM of peers

o     Diluted net operating earnings per common share resulting in year-over-year change better than peer median

     Drove Business Results

o     Top ranked efficiency ratio among peers, which was critical given the economic conditions in 2020

     Optimized Risk Management Infrastructure

o     Risk Committee consistently affirmed bank is operating within its risk appetite despite the on-going pandemic

o     Challenged the bank to rethink leadership needs and capabilities in Risk division resulting in enhanced risk management capabilities

     Differentiated Customer Experience / Drive Operational Effectiveness

o     Co-led Evolve initiative, producing expense reduction and long-term operational effectiveness

oOversaw ongoing development of Agile Technology Transformation / Technology Hub

     Talent & People Driven Organization

o     Continued investment in attracting, developing and promoting diverse talent

 

 

Performance Year

 

 

2019

2020

 

Salary

$745,000

$765,000

 

STI

$880,000

$598,000

 

NQ Stock Options

$538,750

$462,400

 

PHSUs

$1,077,500

$924,800

 

PVSUs (1)

$538,750

$924,800

 

LTI

$2,155,000

$2,312,000

 

Total Direct Compensation

$3,780,000

$3,675,000

 

(1) Represents target amount. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.

 



59


Doris P. Meister

   Executive Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

As an Executive Vice President, Ms. Meister maintains overall responsibility for M&T’s Wealth Management Division.  For performance year 2020, the NCG Committee considered the following factors (among others discussed in this CD&A) in establishing Ms. Meister’s TDC, which reflects a reduction in the bankwide STI pool:

     Drove Business Results

o     Led Wealth Management business and Wealth Advisory Services to increase net contributions YOY and favorable to plan

     Optimized Risk Management Infrastructure

o     Pivoted focus to proactively identifying, recording and escalating risk issues

oConsolidated risk subcommittees to improve control and reduce redundant activities

     Differentiated Customer Experience / Drive Operational Effectiveness

o     Adopted new client-facing staff platform

o     Shifted client onboarding documentation to improve experience and accelerate opening of new accounts

     Talent & People Driven Organization

o     Continued investment in attracting, developing and promoting diverse talent

o     Implemented team-based sales coaching and training program

 

 

Performance Year

 

 

2019

2020

 

Salary

$800,000

$800,000

 

STI

$490,000

$345,000

 

NQ Stock Options

$232,000

$232,000

 

PHSUs

$580,000

$464,000

 

PVSUs (1)

$348,000

$464,000

 

LTI

$1,160,000

$1,160,000

 

Total Direct Compensation

$2,450,000

$2,305,000

 

(1) Represents target amount. Actual payout could range from 0%-150% of target depending on actual performance achieved.


60


Retirement and Other Benefits

M&T maintains two tax-qualified retirement plans for its employees, one a defined benefit plan and the other a defined contribution plan.  Each NEO participates in the defined benefit plan, except for Messrs. Jones and King, who have elected to have their benefits accrued under the defined contribution plan.  Messrs. Jones and King made this election pursuant to a one-time election that was offered to all participants in the defined benefit plan in late 2005 to either (i) remain in the defined benefit plan and earn future benefits under a new reduced benefit formula or (ii)  retain  the frozen benefit in the defined benefit plan and earn future benefits under a new defined contribution plan beginning January 1, 2006.  Ms. Meister was not eligible to participate in the defined benefit plan.

In addition, M&T maintains nonqualified defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans to supplement retirement benefits for the NEOs in order to make up for benefits that cannot be provided in the qualified plans due to Internal Revenue Service limits; however, compensation recognized for this purpose is capped at two times the annual IRS Compensation Limit, indexed annually, which includes maximum creditable compensation, including incentive compensation.  The nonqualified plans are not funded, except as benefits are actually paid to executive officers upon retirement.  Additional information regarding these retirement plans and arrangements is provided in the sections titled “Pension Benefits” and “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”

M&T does not provide the NEOs with severance packages beyond what is provided to employees of M&T, generally.  Consequently, the NEOs have historically participated in the M&T Bank Corporation Severance Pay Plan (“Severance Pay Plan”

Sound Compensation and Governance Practices and Policies

M&T’s executive compensation programs are managed in consideration of the Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies and other regulatory requirements. In light of these requirements, M&T has adopted certain governance practices, which are more fully described below.

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Executives and Board Members. M&T’s philosophy has been to foster a culture for its NEOs to acquire and retain M&T common stock. To bolster this philosophy, M&T maintains formal Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines (“Stock Ownership Guidelines”), which provides for post-employment severance payments that are tiered based upon an employee’s position and years of service, and the continuation of certain employee benefits.  Upon a “Qualifying Event” (defined in the Severance Pay Plan as any permanent, involuntary termination of a participant’s active employment as a result of a reduction in force, restructuring, outsourcing or elimination of position), a NEO would be entitled to benefits under the Severance Pay Plan.

Other than benefits that are generally available to employees, M&T does not maintain any individual severance or change-in-control arrangements.  M&T’s compensation plans do not contain payments or benefits to NEOs that are specifically triggered by a change in control, except that M&T’s Equity Incentive Compensation Plan provides that, upon a change in control, all employees, including the NEOs, would become fully vested in any outstanding awards that were not already vested.  M&T has elected to provide such acceleration because of a belief that the principal purpose of providing executive officers and other employees with equity incentives is to align their interests with those of M&T’s shareholders and that this alignment should be enhanced, not weakened, in the context of a change in control.  Accelerating the vesting of equity-based compensation upon a change in control allows employees the same opportunity as other shareholders to sell shares freely following the completion of the transaction and realize the economic benefits of such transaction, without forcing them to be exposed to the post-closing performance of the acquirer.  More information regarding severance benefits and the impact of a change in control can be found later in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” section.

Sound Compensation and Governance Practices

M&T’s executive compensation programs are managed in consideration of the Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies and other regulatory requirements.  In light of these requirements, M&T has adopted certain governance practices, which are more fully described below.


61


Stock Ownership Guidelines for Executives

M&T’s philosophy has been to foster a culture for its NEOs to acquire and retain M&T common stock.  To bolster this philosophy, M&T maintains formal Stock Ownership Guidelines for our executive officers in order to further align their interests with those of our shareholders. The Stock Ownership Guidelines mandate that executive officers own a significant amount of M&T common stock measured as a multiple of base salary as follows:

 

Role

Ownership Requirement (Multiple of Base Salary)

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

6x

Other NEOs

3x

Other executive officers

2x

RoleOwnership Guideline (Multiple of
Base Salary)

M&T requires its

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer6x
Other NEOs3x
Other executive officers to achieve the targeted stock ownership levels within five years of first becoming subject to the guidelines.  Once the ownership threshold is met, executives are expected to maintain the required ownership amount as long as they are subject to the guidelines.  Shares counted towards these guidelines include any shares held by the executive directly or through a broker, shares held through employee benefit plans, and shares held as restricted stock, restricted stock units or restricted stock awards, whether vested or unvested, including PHSUs.2x

M&T requires its executive officers to achieve the targeted stock ownership levels within five years of first becoming subject to the guidelines. Once the ownership threshold is met, executives are expected to maintain the required ownership amount as long as they are subject to the guidelines. Shares counted towards these guidelines include any shares held by the executive directly or through a broker, shares held through employee benefit plans, and shares held as restricted stock units or restricted stock awards, whether vested or unvested. Unvested PVSUs and unexercised stock options do not count as shares held by the executive for purposes of the guidelines. If an executive officer fails to meet the requirements of this policy, the individual must hold 50% of all shares acquired from the settlement of equity awards, net of shares withheld for taxes or payment of exercise price, if applicable, until the executive meets the ownership threshold. Pursuant to the Stock Ownership Guidelines, the C&HC Committee reviews compliance with the Stock Ownership Guidelines on an annual basis. As of February 14, 2024, all executive officers are in compliance with the Stock Ownership Guidelines.

Members of the Board are also required to own M&T common stock with a value equal to five times their annual cash retainer and are expected to meet this ownership guideline by the fifth anniversary of his or her initial election to the Board. Directors who receive no personal compensation for their service are not subject to this guideline. As of February 14, 2024, all directors are in compliance with the director stock ownership guidelines.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies.M&T’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits all employees from engaging in any hedging transactions or any form of short-term trading with respect to M&T securities. The Insider Trading Policy also prohibits executive officers from pledging M&T securities, except in limited circumstances. None of our NEOs pledged any M&T securities in 2023. For more information regarding the anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies, see “M&T Bank Corporation Insider Trading Policy” further above in this proxy statement.

Clawback and Forfeiture Policies. M&T has a Forfeiture Policy that sets forth the circumstances under which the C&HC Committee may cause a downward adjustment in current year compensation as well as cause all or part of unvested equity awards to be canceled. Such circumstances include, but are not limited to, action or inaction on the part of an employee that results in a significant loss event (either to M&T as a whole or to a significant business line), a restatement of the financial statements due to material noncompliance with applicable financial reporting requirements, or a violation of M&T’s risk policies or procedures.

62

LOGO


In 2023, M&T also adopted the M&T Bank Corporation Executive Compensation Recoupment Policy (the “Recoupment Policy”) that provides for clawback of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation received by M&T’s current or former executive officers. Such clawback is triggered if the company is required to prepare an accounting restatement. The Recoupment Policy was adopted pursuant to NYSE listing standards that implemented the clawback provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.

In addition, our CEO and CFO are subject to the clawback provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which generally requires that they reimburse M&T for any bonus or other incentive- or equity-based compensation and any profits on sales of M&T common stock that they receive within the 12-month period following the public issuance of financial information if there is an accounting restatement because of material noncompliance, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws.

Working together, the components of the executive compensation programs continue to drive alignment of our NEOs’ interests with those of our shareholders, are consistent with the safety and soundness of M&T and provide an enhanced ability to account for the duration of risks and adjust compensation in the event of misconduct or adverse risk outcomes.

Incentive Compensation Governance and Compensation Risk Assessment. M&T works continuously to ensure effective controls are in place for its incentive compensation programs. As part of M&T’s enhanced enterprise risk framework, control functions, including Human Resources, Finance, Compliance, Legal, Internal Audit, and Risk Management, are actively involved in the oversight of M&T’s incentive compensation programs. In addition, the CRO meets with the C&HC Committee to review and discuss M&T’s risk scorecard, which details the CRO’s assessment of risk management at M&T.

Active and effective oversight of M&T’s incentive compensation practices is also provided by the C&HC Committee. The C&HC Committee is responsible for maintaining M&T’s Forfeiture Policy and the Recoupment Policy in addition to determining the appropriate pay mix and total compensation for M&T’s NEOs. Additionally, the C&HC Committee is responsible for establishing the appropriate performance measure for performance-based stock unit awards. Reviews of M&T’s compensation plans and practices by the C&HC Committee and M&T management did not identify any plan that was reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the bank or that would incentivize excessive risk-taking.

Tax Matters

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) generally imposes a $1 million cap on the deductibility of compensation paid to certain executive officers of a publicly held corporation during a year. The executive officers to whom Section 162(m) applies for 2023 include M&T’s CEO and CFO, the next three most highly compensated executive officers, and any such “covered employee” for a year after 2016. The C&HC Committee considers tax consequences to M&T as one of many factors when it makes compensation determinations, and will award compensation to NEOs that it determines to be consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program even if such compensation is not deductible for income tax purposes.

LOGO

63


COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITAL COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation and Human Capital Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of SEC Regulation S-K with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation and Human Capital Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

This report was adopted by the Compensation and Human Capital Committee of the Board of Directors on February 16, 2024:

Gary N. Geisel, Chair

Melinda R. Rich

Herbert Washington

64

LOGO


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table contains information concerning the compensation of M&T’s NEOs in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.

2023 Summary Compensation Table

Name and
Principal Position
 Yr.  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
(1)
($)
  Option
Awards
(1)
($)
  Non-
Equity
In-
centive
Plan
Comp.
($)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Comp.
Earnings
(2)
($)
  All Other
Comp.
(3),(4)
($)
  Total
($)
 

René F. Jones

  2023   1,100,000   2,150,000   4,800,120   1,200,010   —    11,982   123,445   9,385,557 

Chairman &

  2022   1,000,000   2,400,000   4,240,259   1,060,019   —    —    115,429   8,815,707 

Chief Executive Officer

  2021   1,000,000   1,500,000   3,400,240   850,016   —    —    117,918   6,868,174 

Daryl N. Bible

  2023   418,385   750,000   2,500,137   —    —    —    23,162   3,691,684 

Senior Executive Vice President &

  2022   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —  

Chief Financial Officer

  2021   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —  

Darren J. King

  2023   700,000   1,350,000   1,600,248   400,035   —    3,952   103,392   4,157,627 

Senior Executive Vice President &

  2022   685,000   1,100,000   1,120,110   280,038   —    —    92,599   3,277,747 

Co-Head of Businesses (Former Chief Financial Officer)

  2021   685,000   815,000   1,116,192   279,007   —    —    89,524   2,984,723 

Kevin J. Pearson

  2023   775,000   1,300,000   2,000,232   500,020   —    163,129   68,719   4,807,100 

Vice Chairman &

  2022   775,000   1,500,000   1,920,092   480,006   —    —    57,979   4,733,077 

Co-Head of Businesses

  2021   765,000   1,000,000   1,849,811   462,417   —    85,753   64,624   4,227,604 

Christopher E. Kay

  2023   725,000   950,000   1,180,296   295,044   —    —    71,608   3,221,948 

Senior Executive Vice President &

  2022   725,000   1,000,000   1,040,163   260,009   —    —    61,015   3,086,187 

Head of Enterprise Platforms

  2021   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —  

Doris P. Meister

  2023   800,000   750,000   1,400,256   350,019   —    —    84,875   3,385,150 

Senior Executive Vice President &

  2022   800,000   950,000   928,202   232,042   —    —    18,586   2,928,831 

Head of Wealth Management

  2021   800,000   740,000   928,085   232,021   —    —    67,776   2,767,881 

(1)

The amounts indicated represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards net of shares withheld for taxes or payment of exercise price, if applicable, until the executive meets the ownership threshold.  Asgranted to each of the date of this proxy statement, all executive officers are in compliance with the Stock Ownership Guidelines.

Members of M&T’s Board of Directors are also required to own M&T common stock equal to two times their annual retainer amount.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies

M&T’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits all employees from engaging in any hedging transactions or any form of short-term trading with respect to M&T securities.  The Insider Trading Policy also prohibits executive officers from pledging M&T securities, except in limited circumstances.  None of our NEOs pledged any M&T securities in 2020.  For more information regarding the anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies, see “M&T Bank Corporation Insider Trading Policy” further above in this proxy statement.      

Forfeiture Policy

M&T has a Forfeiture Policy that sets forth the circumstances under which the NCG Committee may cause a downward adjustment in current year compensation as well as cause all or part of unvested equity awards to be cancelled.  Such circumstances include, but are not limited to, action or inaction on the part of an employee that results in a significant loss event (either to M&T as a whole or to a significant business line), a restatement of the financial statements due to material noncompliance with applicable financial reporting requirements, or a violation of M&T’s risk policies or procedures.

In addition, our CEO and CFO are subject to the clawback provision of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, which generally requires that they reimburse us for any bonus or other incentive- or equity-based compensation and any profits on sales of M&T common stock that they receive within the 12-month period following the public issuance of financial information if there is an accounting restatement

62


because of material noncompliance, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws.

Working together, the components of the executive compensation programs continue to drive alignment of our NEOs’ interests with those of our shareholders, are consistent with the safety and soundness of M&T and provide an enhanced ability to account for the duration of risks and adjust compensation in the event of misconduct or adverse risk outcomes.

Perquisites

Generally, M&T provides limited perquisites to its NEOs. The perquisites thatgrant date fair values are provided are designed to assist NEOscalculated in being productive and are limited to those that management and the NCG Committee believe are consistentaccordance with M&T’s overall compensation philosophy.  Given the importance of developing business relationships for M&T’s success, the NEOs are generally reimbursed for certain initiation fees and dues they incur for club memberships deemed advisable for business purposes, tax preparation, parking, meals and executive physical examinations.

IncentiveFinancial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation Governance(“FASB ASC Topic 718”).

M&T works continuously to ensure effective controls are in place for its incentive compensation programs. As part of M&T’s enhanced enterprise risk framework, control functions, including Human Resources, Finance, Compliance, Legal, Internal Audit, and Risk Management, are actively involved in the oversight of M&T’s incentive compensation programs.  In addition, M&T’s CRO meets with the NCG Committee to discuss M&T’s risk scorecard, which details the CRO’s assessment of risk management at M&T.

Active and effective oversight of M&T’s incentive compensation practices is also provided by the NCG Committee.  The NCG Committee is responsible for maintaining M&T’s Forfeiture Policy and determining the appropriate pay mix and total compensation for M&T’s NEOs.  Additionally, the NCG Committee is responsible for establishing the appropriate performance measure for performance-based stock unit awards.  The NCG Committee shares one member with the Risk Committee which helps to ensure the prioritization of risk management matters in incentive compensation determinations.  Reviews of M&T’s compensation plans and practices by the NCG Committee and M&T management did not identify any plan that was reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on the company or that would incentivize excessive risk-taking.

Tax Matters

Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) generally imposes a $1 million cap on the deductibility of compensation paid to certain executive officers of a publicly held corporation during a year.  The executive officers to whom Section 162(m) applies for 2020 include M&T’s CEO and CFO, the next three most highly compensated executive officers, and any such “covered employee” for a year after 2016. The exemption for the performance-based compensation from the deduction limitation for compensation was repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.  While the NCG Committee considers tax consequences to M&T as a factor when it makes compensation determinations, the NCG Committee reserves discretion to award compensation to the NEOs that is not deductible under Section 162(m), as the NCG Committee deems appropriate.

 

63


2020 Say-on-Pay Vote and Shareholder Outreach

Our 2020 shareholder vote on executive compensation passed with 95.21% support.  The NCG Committee considered this to be an indication that our shareholders believe that the NEOs’ compensation is aligned with the performance of M&T.

In addition, we regularly engage with shareholders (such as during earnings announcements, investor conferences, and direct shareholder outreach) to gain a deeper understanding of the perspectives and concerns of each shareholder related to our executive compensation programs. In these meetings, our shareholders have generally expressed a positive view with respect to our executive compensation program.  

We regularly evaluate whether our executive compensation programs support our compensation philosophy and objectives and monitor program alignment with our priorities.  Further, we continue to look for ways to provide transparent disclosure around these programs. In connection with this review, combined with other factors discussed in this CD&A as well as the feedback we received from our shareholders, the NCG Committee made the following changes in 2020:

Continued to strengthen the link between long-term company performance and executive compensation by increasing the proportion of PVSUs in the NEOs’ LTI portfolios; and

Revised our approach with regard to paying dividends on PVSUs and PHSUs (as well as with regard to restricted stock unit awards, which are awarded to our broader employee population).  For PVSUs, starting in 2019 and for PHSUs (and restricted stock unit awards) starting in 2020, dividend equivalent units or accrued cash dividends, as applicable, will be paid only if and to the extent that the underlying awards vest and are paid.

NOMINATION, COMPENSATION AND GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

The Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of SEC Regulation S-K with management.  Based on such review and discussions, the Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

This report was adopted on February 12, 2021 by the Nomination, Compensation and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors:

Gary N. Geisel, Chairman

Robert T. Brady

Melinda R. Rich

John R. Scannell

64


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table contains information concerning the compensation of M&T’s NEOs in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

2020 Summary Compensation Table

Name and

Principal Position

Yr.

Salary

($)

 

Bonus

($)

 

Stock

Awards(1)

($)

 

Option

Awards(1)

($)

 

Non-

Equity

In-

centive

Plan

Comp.

($)

 

Change in

Pension

Value and

Non-

Qualified

Deferred

Comp.

Earnings(2)

($)

 

All Other

Comp.(3),(4)

($)

 

Total

($)

 

René F. Jones

2020

 

1,000,000

 

 

750,000

 

 

2,662,566

 

 

887,521

 

 

-

 

 

66,115

 

 

165,805

 

 

5,532,007

 

Chairman &

2019

 

950,000

 

 

1,250,000

 

 

2,640,209

 

 

660,008

 

 

-

 

 

58,702

 

 

145,784

 

 

5,704,703

 

Chief Executive Officer

2018

 

900,000

 

 

1,250,000

 

 

1,875,177

 

 

625,018

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

119,937

 

 

4,770,132

 

Darren J. King

2020

 

685,000

 

 

520,000

 

 

990,308

 

 

330,005

 

 

-

 

 

28,017

 

 

108,749

 

 

2,662,079

 

Executive Vice President &

2019

 

670,000

 

 

765,000

 

 

920,108

 

 

230,015

 

 

-

 

 

24,776

 

 

92,482

 

 

2,702,381

 

Chief Financial Officer

2018

 

670,000

 

 

700,000

 

 

675,170

 

 

225,036

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

86,533

 

 

2,356,739

 

Richard S. Gold

2020

 

765,000

 

 

598,000

 

 

1,724,171

 

 

431,018

 

 

-

 

 

351,528

 

 

100,356

 

 

3,970,073

 

President &

2019

 

745,000

 

 

880,000

 

 

1,580,078

 

 

395,024

 

 

-

 

 

259,228

 

 

104,642

 

 

3,963,972

 

Chief Operating Officer

2018

 

745,000

 

 

880,000

 

 

1,125,030

 

 

375,011

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

89,353

 

 

3,214,394

 

Kevin J. Pearson

2020

 

765,000

 

 

598,000

 

 

1,616,367

 

 

538,772

 

 

-

 

 

367,746

 

 

94,696

 

 

3,980,581

 

Executive Vice President &

2019

 

745,000

 

 

880,000

 

 

1,580,078

 

 

395,024

 

 

-

 

 

283,214

 

 

91,573

 

 

3,974,889

 

Vice Chairman - M&T Bank

2018

 

745,000

 

 

880,000

 

 

1,125,030

 

 

375,011

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

83,780

 

 

3,208,821

 

Doris P. Meister

2020

 

800,000

 

 

345,000

 

 

928,187

 

 

232,015

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

99,619

 

 

2,404,821

 

Executive Vice President

2019

 

800,000

 

 

490,000

 

 

928,006

 

 

232,005

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

82,091

 

 

2,532,102

 

 

2018

 

800,000

 

 

490,000

 

 

750,147

 

 

250,007

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

68,764

 

 

2,358,918

 

(1)

The amounts indicated represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted to each of the NEOs.  The grant date fair values are calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”).

The grant date fair value of stock awards for 20202023 reflected in this column is based on the closing price of M&T common stock on February 5, 2020,January 31, 2023, or $173.04.$156.00. These amounts were calculated in accordance with applicable accounting guidance (i.e., at target for PVSUs awarded in 2020)2023). At the maximum level of performance, the value of the PVSUs awarded in 20202023 would be: $1,331,283$3,600,168 for Mr. Jones; $495,240$1,200,264 for Mr. King; $969,976 for Mr. Gold; $808,270$1,500,252 for Mr. Pearson; $885,300 for Mr. Kay; and $522,235$1,050,192 for Ms. Meister. For Mr. Bible, this Stock Awards column reflects the sign-on grant of time-vested Restricted Stock Units, which were awarded at the time of his hire pursuant to our stock grant policy, the grant date fair value of which is based on the closing price of M&T common stock on July 31, 2023, or $139.86.

 

For purposes of determining the fair value of stock option awards, we use an option pricing model and the assumptions provided in the table below. M&T determines the dividend yield by dividing the current annual dividend on M&T’s common stock by the option exercise price. A historical weekly measurement of volatility is determined based on the expected life of the option granted. The risk-free interest rate is determined by reference to the yield on an outstanding U.S. Treasury Note with a term equal to the expected life of the option granted. Expected life is determined by reference to the M&T’s historical experience.

 

Dividend Yield

3.08

Volatility

33.83

Risk-Free Interest Rate

3.61

Expected Life (Years)

6.50

(2)

2.54%

Volatility

20.17

Risk-Free Interest Rate

1.54%

Expected Life (Years)

6.50

(2)

This column includes the aggregate positive change in actuarial present value of each NEO’s accumulated benefit under the M&T Bank Corporation Pension Plan (“Qualified Pension Plan”) and M&T Bank Corporation Supplemental Pension Plan (“Supplemental Pension Plan”). In accordance with SEC rules, to the extent the aggregate change in present value of all defined benefit plans for a particular fiscal year would have been a negative amount, the amount has instead been reported as $0 and the aggregate compensation for the NEO in the “Total” column has not been adjusted to reflect the negative amount.  The assumptions used to calculate the present value of accumulated benefits are the same as those used for Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 715, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (“FASB ASC Topic 715”) financial statement disclosure purposes, except that no pre-retirement decrements are assumed.  The present value of accrued benefits as of December 31, 2020 is calculated assuming the executive commences his or her accrued benefit earned through December 31, 2020 at normal retirement age.  For the December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019 calculations, the mortality assumption beginning at normal retirement age is based on the RP-2014 mortality table (base year 2006) and generational projection using scale MP-2018. For the December 31, 2020 calculations, the mortality assumption beginning at normal retirement age is based on the Pri-2012 healthy retiree mortality table with white collar adjustment (base year 2012) and generational projection using scale MP-2020. See Note 12 to the Financial Statements of M&T Bank Corporation in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on February 22, 2021.

The discount rate assumption is 4.25% for the NEO in the “Total” column has not been adjusted to reflect the negative amount. The assumptions used to calculate the present value of accumulated benefits are the same as those used for Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 715, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (“FASB ASC Topic 715”) financial statement disclosure purposes, except that no pre-retirement decrements are assumed. The present value of accrued benefits as of December 31, 2018 calculations, 3.25% for2023 is calculated assuming the executive commences his or her accrued benefit earned through December 31, 2019 calculations and 2.50% for2023 at normal retirement age. See Note 13 to the December 31, 2020 calculations.Financial Statements of M&T Bank Corporation in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on February 21, 2024.

 

Normal retirement age is age 65 for all participants. It is assumed that the participants will elect the single life annuity form.

 

LOGO

65


(3)

This column includes information from the following table for each NEO in 2023:

                                                                                                                                                                        

Name

  Retirement
Savings Plan
($)
   Leadership
Retirement
Savings Plan
($)
   Qualified
Retirement
Accumulation
Account
($)
   Leadership
Retirement
Accumulation
Account
($)
   Qualified
Discretionary
Employer
Contribution
($)
   Term Life
Insurance
Premiums
($)
 

René F. Jones

   16,500       16,500       21,450       21,450       —        4,902    

Daryl N. Bible

   2,846       —        —        —        1,025       1,782    

Darren J. King

   16,500       16,500       16,500       16,500       —        1,242    

Kevin J. Pearson

   16,500       16,500       —        —        —        7,524    

Christopher E. Kay

   16,500       16,500       7,425       7,425       —        1,615    

Doris P. Meister

   16,500       16,500       9,075       9,075       —        14,478    

 

65
(4)

Perquisites provided to the NEOs in 2023 included the following (as indicted by “X”):

 


Name

Club
Membership
Dues &
Expenses
Tax
Preparation
ParkingMeals

Executive

Physical

Relocation

René F. Jones

X    X    X    X    X    

Daryl N. Bible

X    X    

Darren J. King

X    X    X    X    

Kevin J. Pearson

X    X    X    

Christopher E. Kay

X    X    X    

Doris P. Meister

X    X    X    

 

(3)

This column includes information from the following table for each NEO in 2020:

Name

Retirement

Savings Plan ($)

 

Leadership

Retirement

Savings Plan ($)

 

Qualified

Retirement

Accumulation

Account ($)

 

Leadership

Retirement

Accumulation

Account ($)

 

Term Life

Insurance

Premiums ($)

 

Dividends(a) ($)

 

René F. Jones

 

14,250

 

 

14,250

 

 

16,388

 

 

16,388

 

 

4,902

 

 

72,521

 

Darren J. King

 

14,250

 

 

14,250

 

 

14,250

 

 

14,250

 

 

1,242

 

 

26,401

 

Richard Gold

 

14,250

 

 

14,250

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

2,558

 

 

44,382

 

Kevin J. Pearson

 

14,250

 

 

14,250

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

4,902

 

 

44,529

 

Doris P. Meister

 

14,250

 

 

14,250

 

 

6,413

 

 

6,413

 

 

14,478

 

 

27,684

 

(a)

This column includes dividends and dividend equivalents on unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units awarded in 2019 and 2018.

(4)

Perquisites provided to the NEOs in 2020 included the following:

Name

Club

Membership

Dues &

Expenses

Tax

Preparation

Parking

Meals

René F. Jones

X

X

X

X

Darren J. King

X

X

X

X

Richard Gold

X

X

X

X

Kevin J. Pearson

X

X

X

Doris P. Meister

X

X

No perquisites provided in 2018, 2019 or 20202023 exceeded the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total perquisites provided to each NEO.

CEO Pay Ratio

In accordance with the final rule issued under section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, companies, including M&T, are now required to disclose the ratio of the total annual compensation of their CEO to that of their median employee.  The SEC rules require disclosure of (i) the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of M&T, except the CEO; (ii) the annual total compensation of the CEO; and (iii) the ratio of the amount of annual total compensation of the CEO to the amount of the median annual total compensation of all employees of M&T.  Because the SEC rules do not mandate a particular approach to determining the median employee, M&T has employed the following approach:  

As allowed under section 953(b), we have chosen a new median employee for purposes of this disclosure. A new median employee was identified this year as the organization experienced reduced incentive pools, impacting the entire incentive-eligible employee population. Our median employee was identified by calculating the total cash compensation and equity awards granted within the twelve months prior to December 28, 2020 to all domestic employees, excluding the CEO, employed as of December 28, 2020. The fixed compensation of employees hired during the year was annualized.

Additionally, non-U.S. employees account for 0.62% of M&T’s employees and therefore have been excluded under the de minimis exemption allowed by the rule. These non-U.S. employees being excluded are from Canada (9 employees), France (2 employees), the United Kingdom (62 employees), Germany (8 employees) and Ireland (27

CEO Pay Ratio

In accordance with the final rule issued under section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act, companies, including M&T, are required to disclose the ratio of the total annual compensation of their CEO to that of their median employee. The SEC rules require disclosure of (i) the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of M&T, except the CEO; (ii) the annual total compensation of the CEO; and (iii) the ratio of the amount of annual total compensation of the CEO to the amount of the median annual total compensation of all employees of M&T. Because the SEC rules do not mandate a particular approach to determining the median employee, M&T has employed the following approach:

As allowed under section 953(b), we have chosen to continue using the same median employee for purposes of this disclosure as was used in the proxy statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. There has been no material change in our employee population that we believe would significantly impact this disclosure. Our median employee was identified by calculating the total cash compensation and equity awards granted within the twelve months prior to December 31, 2023 to all domestic employees, excluding the CEO, employed as of December 31, 2023, the last day of our fiscal year. The fixed compensation of our employees hired during the year was annualized.

Additionally, non-U.S. employees account for 0.60% of M&T’s employees and therefore have been excluded under the de minimis exemption allowed by the rule. These non-U.S. employees being excluded are from Canada (9 employees), France (1 employee), the United Kingdom (77 employees), Germany (9 employees) and Ireland (37 employees).

 

Total non-U.S. employees:

133

Total U.S. employees (not including CEO):

22,089

Total non-U.S. employees:

108

Total U.S. employees:

17,441

As calculated using the methodology required for the Summary Compensation Table, the annual total compensation of Mr. Jones was $5,532,007 and the annual total compensation of the median employee for the corresponding period was $66,091, which yields a ratio of 84

As calculated using the methodology required for the 2023 Summary Compensation Table, the annual total compensation of Mr. Jones was $9,385,557 and the annual total compensation of the median employee for the corresponding period was $84,682, which yields a ratio of 111 to 1.

 

66

 

66

 


Grants of Plan-BasedLOGO


Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table reflects the terms of compensation plan-based awards granted to the NEOs in 2023.

2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Name

 Grant
Date
  C&HC
Committee
Approval
Date
  Estimated Future
Payouts Under Non-
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
($)
  Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
(1)(2)
(#)
  All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Under-
lying
Options
(3)
(#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($)
  Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and
Option
Awards
(5)
($)
 
           Threshold  Target  Max.  Threshold  Target  Max.                 

René F. Jones

  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    15,385   23,078   —    —    —    2,400,060 
   1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    15,385   —    —    —    —    2,400,060 
   1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    25,168   156.00   1,200,010 

Daryl N. Bible(4)

  7/31/2023   5/19/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    17,876   —    —    2,500,137 

Darren J. King

  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    5,129   7,694   —    —    —    800,124 
  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    5,129   —    —    —    —    800,124 
  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    8,390   156.00   400,035 

Kevin J. Pearson

  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    6,411   9,617   —    —    —    1,000,116 
  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    6,411   —    —    —    —    1,000,116 
  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    10,487   156.00   500,020 

Christopher E. Kay

  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    3,783   5,675   —    —    —    590,148 
  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    3,783   —    —    —    —    590,148 
  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    6,188   156.00   295,044 

Doris P. Meister

  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    4,488   6,732   —    —    —    700,128 
  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    4,488   —    —    —    —    700,128 
  1/31/2023   1/26/2023   —    —    —    —    —    —    —    7,341   156.00   350,019 

(1)

Vesting of the PVSU awards granted to the NEOs in 2020.

2020 Grants2023, which appears in the first row for each NEO (except for Mr. Bible), is scheduled to occur on a three-year cliff basis. The PVSUs are earned only to the extent M&T performance is achieved against a pre-established absolute and relative net operating ROTCE metric (“PVSU Performance Metric”) for the three-year performance period of Plan-Based Awards2023–2025, with performance certified by the C&HC Committee in the first quarter of 2026. Depending on the level of the PVSU Performance Metric achieved, the number of shares vesting will be a range between 0% to 150% of the initial award value and will include any accumulated reinvested dividend equivalent units. The awards issued allow for accelerated vesting at target in cases of death and disability, on a pro-rata basis for an involuntary termination without cause, or based on the greater of target or actual performance achieved in the case of a change in control.

 

Name

Grant Date

NCG Committee Approval Date

Estimated Future

Payouts Under Non-

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards ($)

 

Estimated Future

Payouts Under

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards(1) (#)

 

All

Other

Stock

Awards:

Number

of

Shares

of Stock

or Units(2) (#)

 

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number

of

Securities

Under-

lying

Options(3) (#)

 

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards ($)

 

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock and

Option

Awards(4) ($)

 

 

 

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Max.

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Max.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

René F. Jones

2/5/2020

2/5/2020

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

0

 

 

5,129

 

 

7,694

 

 

10,258

 

 

30,541

 

 

173.04

 

 

3,550,088

 

Darren J. King

2/5/2020

2/5/2020

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

0

 

 

1,908

 

 

2,862

 

 

3,815

 

 

11,356

 

 

173.04

 

 

1,320,313

 

Richard S. Gold

2/5/2020

2/5/2020

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

0

 

 

3,737

 

 

5,606

 

 

6,227

 

 

14,832

 

 

173.04

 

 

2,155,188

 

Kevin J. Pearson

2/5/2020

2/5/2020

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

0

 

 

3,114

 

 

4,671

 

 

6,227

 

 

18,540

 

 

173.04

 

 

2,155,139

 

Doris P. Meister

2/5/2020

2/5/2020

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

0

 

 

2,012

 

 

3,018

 

 

3,352

 

 

7,984

 

 

173.04

 

 

1,160,202

 

(2)

Vesting of the PHSU awards granted to the NEOs in 2023, which appears in the second row for each NEO (except for Mr. Bible), is scheduled to occur on a graduated basis with 33% vesting on January 31, 2024, an additional 33% vesting on January 31, 2025 and the remaining 34% vesting on January 31, 2026. Each vesting is contingent upon M&T achieving a pre-established net operating ROTCE metric (“PHSU Performance Hurdle”). Awards are only payable at the target level; if the PHSU Performance Hurdle is not satisfied for a given year, the portion of the stock award that is scheduled to vest on the vesting date immediately following that performance period will not vest and will be forfeited unless otherwise determined by the C&HC Committee. The awards allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, position elimination, retirement, or a change in control.

 

(3)

Vesting of the stock option awards granted to the NEOs in 2023 is scheduled to occur on a graduated basis with 33% vesting on January 31, 2024, an additional 33% vesting on January 31, 2025 and the remaining 34% vesting on January 31, 2026. The awards expire 10 years from the grant date. The awards allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, or a change in control with an exercise period of one year from the date of termination (but not beyond 10 years from the date of grant). Upon retirement, the awards continue to vest according to the schedule noted above with an exercise period equal to the lesser of four years following the date of retirement or 10 years from the date of grant.

 

(1)

Vesting of the PVSU awards granted to the NEOs in 2020 is scheduled to occur on a 3-year cliff basis, with vesting anticipated on February 5, 2023. The vesting is contingent upon M&T achieving pre-established absolute and relative net operating ROTCE metric (“Performance Metric”). Depending on the level of Performance Metric achieved, the number of shares vesting will be a range between 0% to 150% of the initial award value and will include any accumulated reinvested dividend equivalent units. The awards issued allow for accelerated vesting at target in cases of death and disability, on a pro-rata basis for an involuntary termination without cause,
(4)

The grant for Mr. Bible was delivered in Restricted Stock Units upon his employment and in accordance with the stock granting policy. The vesting is scheduled to occur on a graduated basis with 33% vesting on July 31, 2024, an additional 33% vesting on July 31, 2025 and the remaining 34% vesting on July 31, 2026. The Restricted Stock Units allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, retirement, position elimination, or based on the greater of target or actual performance achieved in the case of a change in control.

 

(5)

The amounts indicated represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted to each of the NEOs in 2023. The grant date fair values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

 

(2)

Vesting of the PHSU awards granted to the NEOs in 2020 is scheduled to occur on a graduated basis with 33% vesting on February 5, 2021, an additional 33% vesting on February 5, 2022 and the remaining 34% vesting on February 5, 2023.  Each vesting is contingent upon M&T achieving a pre-established net operating ROTCE metric (“Performance Requirement”).  If the Performance Requirement is not satisfied for a given year, the portion of the stock award that is scheduled to vest on the vesting date immediately following that performance period will not vest and will be forfeited unless otherwise determined by the NCG Committee.  The award agreements issued under the 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, position elimination, retirement or a change in control.  

(3)

Vesting of the stock option awards granted to the NEOs in 2020 is scheduled to occur on a graduated basis with 33% vesting on February 5, 2021, an additional 33% vesting on February 5, 2022 and the remaining 34% vesting on February 5, 2023.  The awards expire 10 years from the grant date.  The award agreements issued under the 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, or a change in control with an exercise period of one year from the date of termination (but not beyond 10 years from the date of grant).  Upon retirement the awards continue to vest according to the schedule noted above with an exercise period equal to the lesser of four years following the date of retirement or 10 years from the date of grant.

(4)

The amounts indicated represent the aggregate grant date fair value of equity awards granted to each of the NEOs in 2020.  The grant date fair values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

 

67

LOGO

 


67

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table reflects the number and terms of stock option awards and stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 2023 for the NEOs.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2023 Fiscal Year-End

  

Option Awards

 

      

Stock Awards

 

 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options Un-
exercisable
(1)
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(1)(2)
(#)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(1)(3)(4)
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 

René F. Jones

  16,770   —    —    190.78   1/31/28   —    —    —    —  
  22,215   —    —    164.54   1/31/29   —    —    —    —  
  30,541   —    —    173.04   2/5/30   —    —    —    —  
  18,488   9,245   —    132.47   1/29/31   —    —    —    —  
  7,656   15,313   —    169.38   1/31/32   —    —    —    —  
  —    25,168   —    156.00   1/31/33   25,922   3,553,388   49,225   6,747,778 

Daryl N. Bible(5)

  —    —    —    —    —    17,876   2,450,442   —    —  

Darren J. King

  6,038   —    —    190.78   1/31/28   —    —    —    —  
  7,742   —    —    164.54   1/31/29   —    —    —    —  
  11,356   —    —    173.04   2/5/30   —    —    —    —  
  6,068   3,035   —    132.47   1/29/31   —    —    —    —  
  2,022   4,046   —    169.38   1/31/32   —    —    —    —  
  —    8,390   —    156.00   1/31/33   8,188   1,122,411   14,667   2,010,595 

Kevin J. Pearson

  10,062   —    —    190.78   1/31/28   —    —    —    —  
  13,296   —    —    164.54   1/31/29   —    —    —    —  
  18,540   —    —    173.04   2/5/30   —    —    —    —  
  10,058   5,029   —    132.47   1/29/31   —    —    —    —  
  3,467   6,934   —    169.38   1/31/32   —    —    —    —  
   —    10,487   —    156.00   1/31/33   11,574   1,586,564   21,422   2,936,545 

Christopher E. Kay

  1,878   3,756   —    169.38   1/31/32   —    —    —    —  
  —    6,188   —    156.00   1/31/33   7,207   987,936   12,089   1,657,179 

Doris P. Meister

  6,708   —    —    190.78   1/31/28   —    —    —    —  
  7,984   —    —    173.04   2/5/30   —    —    —    —  
  2,523   2,524   —    132.47   1/29/31   —    —    —    —  
  1,676   3,352   —    169.38   1/31/32   —    —    —    —  
  —    7,341   —    156.00   1/31/33   7,027   963,261   12,526   1,717,072 

(1)

Vesting details provided below in separate chart for outstanding Stock Options, PHSUs and PVSUs.

(2)

Vesting of the PHSU awards granted to the NEOs in 2021, 2022 and 2023 occurs on a graduated basis with 33% of the award vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date, an additional 33% of the award vesting on the second anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining 34% of the award vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date. Each vesting is contingent upon M&T achieving the pre-established PHSU Performance Hurdle. If the PHSU Performance Hurdle is not satisfied for a given period, the portion of the stock award that is scheduled to vest on the vesting date immediately following that performance period will not vest and will be forfeited unless otherwise determined by the C&HC Committee. Note that with respect to the 2019 awards, the award agreements issued under the 2009 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, retirement or a change in control, while the 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 awards, which were issued under the 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, allow accelerated vesting in the aforementioned cases plus in situations of a position elimination. See footnotes (1), (2) and (3) to the table set forth above titled “2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” for the vesting schedule of the stock awards granted to the NEOs in 2023. See the below chart for more detailed information concerning the number of outstanding shares from each PHSU grant that remain unvested and their corresponding vesting dates.

68

LOGO


(3)

Vesting of the PVSU award granted to the NEOs in 2023 occurs on a 3-year cliff basis and has a payout range of 0% to 150% based on pre-established absolute and relative ROTCE performance over the 3-year performance period. Shares in this column include the accrued dividend equivalent units, which accrue quarterly at the time the quarterly dividend is paid and reflect maximum payout at 150%. See the below chart for more detailed information concerning the number of outstanding shares from each PVSU grant that remain unvested and their corresponding vesting dates.

(4)

The PVSUs granted on January 29, 2021, with a performance period of January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023, vested on December 31, 2023, and were earned based on the level of achievement against the pre-established performance metrics as determined by the C&HC Committee on February 16, 2024. These PVSUs are reflected in the 2023 Options Exercised and Stock Vested table.

(5)

The grant for Mr. Bible was delivered in Restricted Stock Units upon his employment and in accordance with our stock grant policy. The vesting is scheduled to occur on a graduated basis with 33% vesting on July 31, 2024, an additional 33% vesting on July 31, 2025 and the remaining 34% vesting on July 31, 2026. The Restricted Stock Units allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, retirement, position elimination, or change in control.

Name(1)

  Grant Date  Total Unvested Options
Outstanding
   Options Not Vested   Remaining
Vesting
Dates
 

René F. Jones

  1/29/21   9,245    9,245    1/29/24 
  1/31/22   15,313    7,656    1/31/24 
   7,657    1/31/25 
  1/31/23   25,168    8,389    1/31/24 
   8,389    1/31/25 
   8,390    1/31/26 

Darren J. King

  1/29/21   3,035    3,035    1/29/24 
  1/31/22   4,046    2,023    1/31/24 
   2,023    1/31/25 
  1/31/23   8,390    2,796    1/31/24 
   2,797    1/31/25 
   2,797    1/31/26 

Kevin J. Pearson

  1/29/21   5,029    5,029    1/29/24 
  1/31/22   6,934    3,467    1/31/24 
   3,467    1/31/25 
  1/31/23   10,487    3,495    1/31/24 
   3,496    1/31/25 
   3,496    1/31/26 

Christopher E. Kay

  1/31/22   3,756    1,878    1/31/24 
   1,878    1/31/25 
  1/31/23   6,188    2,062    1/31/24 
   2,063    1/31/25 
   2,063    1/31/26 

Doris P. Meister

  1/29/21   2,524    2,524    1/29/24 
  1/31/22   3,352    1,676    1/31/24 
   1,676    1/31/25 
  1/31/23   7,341    2,447    1/31/24 
   2,447    1/31/25 
   2,447    1/31/26 

(1)

Mr. Bible did not have any outstanding Stock Options as of December 31, 2020 for the NEOs.2023.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-End

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Un-exercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Un-

exercised

Options Un-

exercisable(1)

(#)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Un-

exercised

Unearned

Options

(#)

 

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

 

Option

Expira-

tion

Date

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That Have

Not Vested(1)(2)

(#)

 

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock

That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not Vested(1)(3)

(#)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other

Rights

That Have

Not Vested

($)

 

 

 

11,180

 

 

5,590

 

 

-

 

 

190.78

 

1/31/2028

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

René F. Jones

 

7,405

 

 

14,810

 

 

-

 

 

164.54

 

1/31/2029

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

30,541

 

-

 

 

173.04

 

2/5/2030

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,558

 

 

2,744,333

 

 

14,452

 

 

1,839,740

 

 

 

4,025

 

 

2,013

 

 

-

 

 

190.78

 

1/31/2028

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Darren J. King

 

2,580

 

 

5,162

 

 

-

 

 

164.54

 

1/31/2029

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

11,356

 

-

 

 

173.04

 

2/5/2030

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,792

 

 

991,922

 

 

5,224

 

 

665,015

 

 

 

6,708

 

 

3,354

 

 

-

 

 

190.78

 

1/31/2028

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Richard S. Gold

 

4,432

 

 

8,864

 

 

-

 

 

164.54

 

1/31/2029

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

14,832

 

-

 

 

173.04

 

2/5/2030

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,995

 

 

1,654,264

 

 

9,692

 

 

1,233,792

 

 

 

6,708

 

 

3,354

 

-

 

 

190.78

 

1/31/2028

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Kevin J. Pearson

 

4,432

 

 

8,864

 

 

-

 

 

164.54

 

1/31/2029

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

18,540

 

-

 

 

173.04

 

2/5/2030

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,995

 

 

1,654,264

 

 

8,718

 

 

1,109,801

 

 

 

4,472

 

 

2,236

 

 

-

 

 

190.78

 

1/31/2028

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Doris P. Meister

 

2,603

 

 

5,206

 

 

-

 

 

164.54

 

1/31/2029

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

7,984

 

-

 

 

173.04

 

2/5/2030

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,484

 

 

952,713

 

 

5,406

 

 

688,184

 

(1)

Vesting details provided below in separate chart for Options, PHSUs and PVSUs.

(2)

Vesting of the PHSU awards granted to the NEOs in 2018, 2019 and 2020 occurs on a graduated basis with 33% of the award vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date, an additional 33% of the award vesting on the second anniversary of the grant date, and the remaining 34% of the award vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date.  Each vesting is contingent upon M&T achieving a pre-established net operating ROTCE metric (“Performance Requirement”).  If the Performance Requirement is not satisfied for a given period, the portion of the stock award that is scheduled to vest on the vesting date immediately following that performance period will not vest and will be forfeited unless otherwise determined by the NCG Committee.  Note that with respect to the 2018 and 2019 awards, the award agreements issued under the 2009 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan allow for accelerated vesting in cases of death, disability, retirement or a change in control, while the 2020 award which was issued under the 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan allow accelerated vesting in the aforementioned cases plus in situations of a position elimination. See footnotes (1), (2) and (3) to the table set forth above titled “2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” for the vesting schedule of the stock awards granted to the NEOs in 2020.  See the below chart for more detailed information concerning the number of outstanding shares from each PHSU grant that remain unvested and their corresponding vesting dates.  

(3)

Vesting of the PVSU award granted to the NEOs in 2020 occurs on a 3-year cliff basis and has a payout range of 0% to 150% based on pre-established absolute and relative ROTCE performance over the 3-year performance period.  Shares in this column include the accrued Dividend Equivalent Units, which accrue quarterly at the time the quarterly dividend is paid, and reflect maximum payout at 150%, as performance was trending above target as of December 31, 2020. See the below chart for more detailed information concerning the number of outstanding shares from each PVSU grant that remain unvested and their corresponding vesting dates.  

 

LOGO

 

68

69


Name(1)

  Grant Date   Performance Based
Stock Units Granted
   Performance Based
Stock Units Not
Vested
   Remaining
Vesting Dates
 

René F. Jones

   1/29/21    12,834    4,278    1/29/24 
   1/31/22    9,388    3,129    1/31/24 
   3,130    1/31/25 
   1/31/22    15,646    16,789(2)    12/31/24 
   1/31/23    15,385    5,128    1/31/24 
   5,128    1/31/25 
   5,129    1/31/26 
   1/31/23    15,385    16,028(2)    12/31/25 

Darren J. King

   1/29/21    4,213    1,405    1/29/24 
   1/31/22    2,480    827    1/31/24 
   827    1/31/25 
   1/31/22    4,133    4,435(2)    12/31/24 
   1/31/23    5,129    1,709    1/31/24 
   1,710    1/31/25 
   1,710    1/31/26 
   1/31/23    5,129    5,343(2)    12/31/25 

Kevin J. Pearson

   1/29/21    6,982    2,328    1/29/24 
   1/31/22    4,251    1,417    1/31/24 
   1,418    1/31/25 
   1/31/22    7,085    7,603(2)    12/31/24 
   1/31/23    6,411    2,136    1/31/24 
   2,137    1/31/25 
   2,138    1/31/26 
   1/31/23    6,411    6,679(2)    12/31/25 

Christopher E. Kay

   1/29/21    5,662    1,888    1/29/24 
   1/31/22    2,303    768    1/31/24 
   768    1/31/25 
   1/31/22    3,838    4,118(2)    12/31/24 
   1/31/23    3,783    1,260    1/31/24 
   1,261    1/31/25 
   1,262    1/31/26 
   1/31/23    3,783    3,941(2)    12/31/25 

Doris P. Meister

   1/29/21    3,503    1,168    1/29/24 
   1/31/22    2,055    685    1/31/24 
   686    1/31/25 
   1/31/22    3,425    3,675(2)    12/31/24 
   1/31/23    4,488    1,495    1/31/24 
   1,496    1/31/25 
   1,497    1/31/26 
   1/31/23    4,488    4,676(2)    12/31/25 

 

(1)

Mr. Bible did not have any outstanding PHSUs or PVSUs as of December 31, 2023.

 


Name

Grant Date

Options Outstanding

 

Options Not Vested

 

Remaining

Vesting

Dates

 

1/31/18

 

5,590

 

 

5,590

 

1/31/21

 

1/31/19

 

14,810

 

 

7,405

 

1/31/21

René F. Jones

 

 

 

 

 

7,405

 

1/31/22

 

2/5/20

 

30,541

 

 

10,180

 

2/5/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,180

 

2/5/22

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,181

 

2/5/23

 

1/31/18

 

2,013

 

 

2,013

 

1/31/21

 

1/31/19

 

5,162

 

 

2,581

 

1/31/21

Darren J. King

 

 

 

 

 

2,581

 

1/31/22

 

2/5/20

 

11,356

 

 

3,785

 

2/5/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,785

 

2/5/22

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,786

 

2/5/23

 

1/31/18

 

3,354

 

 

3,354

 

1/31/21

 

1/31/19

 

8,864

 

 

4,432

 

1/31/21

Richard S. Gold

 

 

 

 

 

4,432

 

1/31/22

 

2/5/20

 

14,832

 

 

4,944

 

2/5/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,944

 

2/5/22

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,944

 

2/5/23

 

1/31/18

 

3,354

 

 

3,354

 

1/31/21

 

1/31/19

 

8,864

 

 

4,432

 

1/31/21

Kevin J. Pearson

 

 

 

 

 

4,432

 

1/31/22

 

2/5/20

 

18,540

 

 

6,180

 

2/5/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,180

 

2/5/22

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,180

 

2/5/23

 

1/31/18

 

2,236

 

 

2,236

 

1/31/21

 

1/31/19

 

5,206

 

 

2,603

 

1/31/21

Doris P. Meister

 

 

 

 

 

2,603

 

1/31/22

 

2/5/20

 

7,984

 

 

2,661

 

2/5/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,661

 

2/5/22

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,662

 

2/5/23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2)

Awards indicated are PVSUs with a three-year cliff vesting schedule with payouts ranging from 0% to 150% of target based on absolute and relative ROTCE performance. Also included in these figures are the accrued reinvested dividend equivalent units which are accrued on a quarterly basis and will pay out at the time the underlying shares vest and are subject to the same performance payout percentage. The PVSUs vest on December 31 of the last year of the three-year performance period, as indicated in the chart, but are not actually earned and settled until after the level of achievement against the pre-established performance metrics is determined by the C&HC Committee, which is completed in the first quarter of the year following the three-year performance period.

70

 

LOGO


Options Exercised and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth the number of stock option awards exercised and the value realized upon exercise during 2023 for the NEOs, as well as the number of stock awards vested and the value realized upon vesting.

2023 Options Exercised and Stock Vested

   Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

  

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise

(#)

  Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
   

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(1)

(#)

   Value Realized
on Vesting
(2)
($)
 

René F. Jones

  —    —     32,111    4,740,425.56 

Darren J. King

  —    —     10,488    1,549,403.42 

Kevin J. Pearson

  —    —     17,398    2,570,030.61 

Christopher E. Kay

  —    —     4,100    683,083.08 

Doris P. Meister

  —    —     8,779    1,298,409.99 

 

(1)

Includes PVSUs granted on January 29, 2021 with a performance period of January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023. The PVSUs and dividend equivalent units vested on December 31, 2023 and were earned after the level of achievement 150% against the pre-established performance metrics was determined by the C&HC Committee on February 16, 2024.

 

(2)

69


Name

Grant Date

Performance Based Stock Units Granted

 

Performance Based Stock Units Not

Vested

 

Remaining

Vesting Dates

 

1/31/18

 

9,829

 

 

3,277

 

1/31/21

 

1/31/19

 

12,034

 

 

4,011

 

1/31/21

René F. Jones

 

 

 

 

 

4,012

 

1/31/22

 

1/31/19

 

4,012

 

4,288 (a)

 

12/31/21

 

2/5/20

 

10,258

 

 

3,419

 

2/5/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,419

 

2/5/22

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,420

 

2/5/23

 

2/5/20

 

5,129

 

5,346 (a)

 

12/31/22

 

1/31/18

 

3,539

 

 

1,180

 

1/31/21

 

1/31/19

 

4,194

 

 

1,398

 

1/31/21

Darren J. King

 

 

 

 

 

1,399

 

1/31/22

 

1/31/19

 

1,398

 

1,494 (a)

 

12/31/21

 

2/5/20

 

3,815

 

 

1,271

 

2/5/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,272

 

2/5/22

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,272

 

2/5/23

 

2/5/20

 

1,908

 

1,989 (a)

 

12/31/22

 

1/31/18

 

5,897

 

 

1,966

 

1/31/21

 

1/31/19

 

7,202

 

 

2,401

 

1/31/22

Richard S. Gold

 

 

 

 

 

2,401

 

1/31/22

 

1/31/19

 

2,401

 

2,566 (a)

 

12/31/21

 

2/5/20

 

6,227

 

 

2,075

 

2/5/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,076

 

2/5/22

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,076

 

2/5/23

 

2/5/20

 

3,737

 

3,895 (a)

 

12/31/22

 

1/31/18

 

5,897

 

 

1,966

 

1/31/21

 

1/31/19

 

7,202

 

 

2,401

 

1/31/21

Kevin J. Pearson

 

 

 

 

 

2,401

 

1/31/22

 

1/31/19

 

2,401

 

2,566 (a)

 

12/31/21

 

2/5/20

 

6,227

 

 

2,075

 

2/5/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,076

 

2/5/22

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,076

 

2/5/23

 

2/5/20

 

3,114

 

3,246 (a)

 

12/31/22

 

1/31/18

 

3,932

 

 

1,311

 

1/31/21

 

1/31/19

 

4,230

 

 

1,410

 

1/31/21

Doris P. Meister

 

 

 

 

 

1,411

 

1/31/22

 

1/31/19

 

1,410

 

1,507 (a)

 

12/31/21

 

2/5/20

 

3,352

 

 

1,117

 

2/5/21

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,117

 

2/5/22

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,118

 

2/5/23

 

2/5/20

 

2,012

 

2,097 (a)

 

12/31/22

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

Awards indicated are PVSUs with a three-year cliff vesting schedule with payouts ranging from 0% to 150% of target based on absolute and relative ROTCE performance. Also included in these figures are the accrued reinvested dividend equivalent units which are accrued on a quarterly basis and will pay out at the timeAmounts were calculated using the closing price of M&T’s common stock on the NYSE on the vesting dates. This also includes accrued cash dividends that payout only to the extent the underlying shares vest and are subject to the same performance payout percentage.  

70


Options Exercised and Stock Vesteddistribute to participants.

The following table sets forth the number of stock option awards exercised and the value realized upon exercise during 2020 for the NEOs, as well as the number of stock awards vested and the value realized upon vesting.

2020 Options Exercised and Stock Vested

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

Number of

Shares Acquired

on Exercise (#)

 

Value Realized

on Exercise(1) ($)

 

Number of

Shares Acquired

on Vesting (#)

 

Value Realized

on Vesting(2) ($)

 

René F. Jones

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

9,428

 

 

1,588,807

 

Darren J. King

-

 

-

 

 

4,116

 

 

693,628

 

Richard S. Gold

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

6,507

 

 

1,096,560

 

Kevin J. Pearson

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

6,641

 

 

1,119,141

 

Doris P. Meister

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

4,507

 

 

759,520

 

(1)

Based upon the difference between the exercise price and the closing price of M&T’s common stock on the NYSE on the date(s) of exercise.

(2)

Amounts were calculated using the closing price of M&T’s common stock on the NYSE on the vesting dates.

Pension Benefits

The following table sets forth the present value of the accumulated pension benefits for the NEOs.

2023 Pension Benefits(1)(5)

Name

  Plan Name  Number of
Years Credited
Service
(3)
   

Present Value
of
Accumulated
Benefit

($)

   Payments
during Last
Fiscal Year
($)
 

René F. Jones

  Qualified Pension Plan(2)   13    251,620    —  

Darren J. King

  Qualified Pension Plan(2)   5    82,980    —  

Kevin J. Pearson

  Qualified Pension Plan(2)   34    1,185,299    —  
   Supplemental Pension Plan(2)(4)   34    403,828    —  

(1)

Please refer to footnote (2) to the “2023 Summary Compensation Table” for the assumptions used to calculate the present value of the accumulated benefits.

(2)

The Qualified Pension Plan provides tax-qualified pension benefits for a broad base of M&T employees. Effective January 1, 2006, the NEOs.

2020formula used to calculate benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan was modified with respect to benefits earned after 2005. Benefits(1)(5) accrued under the prior formula as of December 31, 2005 were frozen and all Qualified Pension Plan participants, including each NEO (other than Ms. Meister and Messrs. Kay and Bible, who were never eligible to participate in the Qualified Pension Plan), were given a one-time election to remain an active participant in the Qualified Pension Plan and earn future benefits under a new reduced pension benefit formula, or to retain the frozen benefit in the Qualified Pension Plan and earn future enhanced benefits pursuant to a new component under the M&T Bank Corporation Retirement Savings Plan known as the “Qualified RAA.” Under the Qualified Pension Plan, each participant’s retirement benefit equals the sum of (a) the participant’s accrued benefit as of December 31, 2005 and (b) for each year of credited service earned after December 31, 2005, the sum of (i) 1% of compensation up to the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit for the plan year plus (ii) 0.35% of eligible compensation for the plan year in excess of 50% of that year’s Social Security wage base. Mr. Pearson elected to remain in the Qualified Pension Plan for periods on and after January 1, 2006. Messrs. Jones and King elected to discontinue their future participation in the Qualified Pension Plan and Supplemental Pension Plan, choosing instead to participate in the Qualified RAA effective January 1, 2006. Messrs. Jones and King have an accrued benefit under the Qualified Pension Plan as of December 31, 2005 but have ceased to earn any benefit accrual service and any further benefit under the Qualified Pension Plan as of January 1, 2006.

Name

Plan Name

Number of

Years Credited

Service(3)

Present Value

of Accumulated

Benefit ($)

 

Payments

during Last

Fiscal Year ($)

 

René F. Jones

Qualified Pension Plan(2)

13

 

345,515

 

 

-

 

Darren J. King

Qualified Pension Plan(2)

5

 

128,328

 

 

-

 

Richard S. Gold

Qualified Pension Plan(2)

31

 

1,241,698

 

 

-

 

 

Supplemental Pension Plan(2)(4)

31

 

336,556

 

 

-

 

Kevin J. Pearson

Qualified Pension Plan(2)

31

 

1,334,204

 

 

-

 

 

Supplemental Pension Plan(2)(4)

31

 

339,107

 

 

-

 

 

(3)

The years of credited service for all of the NEOs are based only on their service while eligible for participation in the Qualified Pension Plan. Generally, a participant must be paid for at least 1,000 hours of work during a plan year to be credited with a year of service for purposes of the Qualified Pension Plan.

 

LOGO

71


(4)

(1)

Please refer to footnote (2) to the “2020 Summary Compensation Table” for the assumptions used to calculate the present value of accumulated benefits.

(2)

The Qualified Pension Plan provides tax-qualified pension benefits for a broad base of M&T employees.  Effective January 1, 2006, the formula used to calculate benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan was modified with respect to benefits earned after 2005.  Benefits accrued under the prior formula as of December 31, 2005 were frozen and all Qualified Pension Plan participants, including each NEO (other than Ms. Meister, who was never eligible to participate in the Qualified Pension Plan), were given a one-time election to remain in the Qualified Pension Plan and earn future benefits under a new reduced pension benefit formula, or to retain the frozen benefit in the Qualified Pension Plan and earn future benefits under a new defined contribution program, the Qualified RAA, in which qualifying participants are credited a percentage of total pay based on length of service.  Under the current formula, each participant’s retirement benefit equals the sum of (a) the participant’s accrued benefit as of December 31, 2005 and (b) for each year of credited service earned after December 31, 2005, the sum of (i) 1% of compensation for the plan year plus (ii) 0.35% of compensation for the plan year in excess of 50% of that year’s Social Security wage base.  Messrs. Pearson and Gold elected to remain in the Qualified Pension Plan for periods on and after January 1, 2006.  Messrs. Jones and King elected to discontinue their future participation in the Qualified Pension Plan and Supplemental Pension Plan, choosing instead to participate in the Qualified RAA and Leadership RAA effective January 1, 2006.  Messrs. Jones and King have an accrued benefit under the Qualified Pension Plan as of December 31, 2005 but have ceased to earn any benefit accrual service and any further benefit under the Qualified Pension Plan as of January 1, 2006.

(3)

The years of credited service for all of the NEOs are based only on their service while eligible for participation in the Qualified Pension Plan.  Generally, a participant must be paid for at least 1,000 hours of work during a plan year to be credited with a year of service for purposes of the Qualified Pension Plan.

71


(4)

As described in footnote (2) above, effective January 1, 2006, the formula used to calculate benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan was modified with respect to benefits earned after 2005, and participants were given the opportunity to elect whether to continue participation in the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan.  Of the NEOs, Messrs. Pearson and Gold elected to continue to participate in the revised Qualified Pension Plan and, as such, they continue to be participants in the Supplemental Pension Plan.  Messrs. Jones and King elected to discontinue their future participation in the Qualified Pension Plan and Supplemental Pension Plan, choosing instead to participate in the Qualified RAA and Leadership RAA effective January 1, 2006.  M&T maintains a defined contribution Leadership RAA that is designed to provide participants with contributions that cannot be provided under the Qualified RAA because of applicable Internal Revenue Service income tax limits. Beginning in 2020, M&T amended the non-qualified retirement plans to allow the maximum creditable compensation, including incentive compensation, to be increased from $350,000 to two times the annual IRS Compensation Limit, indexed annually.  Messrs. Jones and King participated in the Leadership RAA in 2020 and were credited with a contribution for 2020 as reported below under the discussion of 2020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.

(5)

Ms. Meister is not a participant in the Qualified Pension Plan or Supplemental Pension Plan.

Explanation of 2020 Pension Benefits Table

The 2020 Pension Benefits Table indicates, for each of the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan, the NEO’s number of years of credited service, present value of accumulated benefit and any payments made during the year ended December 31, 2020.  See footnote (2) to the table set forth above titled “2020 Summary Compensation Table.”

The amounts indicated in the column titled “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” represent the lump-sum value as of December 31, 2020 of the annual benefit that was earned by the NEOs as of December 31, 2020, assuming payment begins at each executive’s normal retirement age, or their current age, if later.  The normal retirement age is defined as age 65 in the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan. Certain assumptions were usedOf the NEOs, Mr. Pearson elected to determine the present value of accumulated benefits payable at normal retirement age.  Those assumptions are described in footnote (2) set forthcontinue to actively participate in the “2020 Summary Compensation Table.”  Certain material terms of each of therevised Qualified Pension Plan and, the Supplemental Pension Plan are summarized in the footnotes set forth in the “2020 Pension Benefits Table” and in the narrative below.

Qualified Pension Plan

Benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan are paid over the lifetime of the NEO or the lifetimes of the NEO and a beneficiary, as elected by the NEO.  If the NEO is married on the date payments are to begin under the Qualified Pension Plan, payment will be in the form of a joint and 50% survivor annuity with the spouse as beneficiary unless the NEO elects another form of payment with the consent of the spouse.  None of the NEOs are eligible to elect to receive the benefit due under the Qualified Pension Plan in the form of a one-time lump sum payment.  If benefits are paid in a form in which a benefit is to be paid to a beneficiary after the death of the NEO, benefits are reduced from the amount payable as a lifetime benefit solely to the NEO in accordance with the actuarial factors that apply to all participants in the Qualified Pension Plan.  A participant’s benefit under the Qualified Pension Plan is generally payable as an annuity with monthly benefit payments unless the present value of the normal retirement benefit is less than $5,000.  Benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan are funded by an irrevocable, tax-exempt trust.  The Qualified Pension Plan benefits of all participants, including those benefits of NEOs, are payable from the assets held by the tax-exempt trust.

Creditable compensation under the Qualified Pension Plan generally includes the compensation reported on Form W-2 in the box for wages, tips and other compensation plus pre-tax salary reduction contributions under the Retirement Savings Plan and the M&T Bank Corporation Flexible Benefits Plan.  In calculating a participant’s benefit, annual compensation in excess of a limit set annually by the Internal Revenue Service may not be considered.

72


A participant is eligible for early retirement under the Qualified Pension Plan if the participant retires before normal retirement age but after attaining age 55 and completing 10 years of service. An early retirement benefit is reduced 4% per year for each year that the benefit commences prior to normal retirement age.  At December 31, 2020,such, Mr. King was not eligible for early retirement and Messrs. Jones, Gold and Pearson were eligible for early retirement. Benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan are 100% vested after an employee has completed at least five years of service, and each NEO is 100% vested in his benefits in the Qualified Pension Plan.

Supplemental Pension Plan

The Supplemental Pension Plan provides a benefit that is equal to the difference between the pension benefit that would be provided under the Qualified Pension Plan if that plan were not subject to certain limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, and the benefit actually provided under the Qualified Pension Plan.  Beginning in 2020, the creditable compensation, including incentive compensation, was amended from a compensation maximum of $350,000 to 2 times the Annual IRS Compensation Limit, indexed annually.

Generally, benefits under the Supplemental Pension Plan are paid over the lifetime of the NEO or the lifetimes of the NEO and a beneficiary, as elected by the NEO.  The Supplemental Pension Plan allows a NEO to elect to receive the benefit due under the plan in the form of a one-time lump sum payment.  If benefits are paid as a lump sum payment, benefits are adjusted from the amount payable as a lifetime benefit solely to the NEO in accordance with the actuarial factors that apply to all participants in the Qualified Pension Plan.

The pension benefit under the Supplemental Pension Plan is reduced in the same manner as under the Qualified Pension Plan if it begins to be paid before normal retirement age and continues to accrue in the same manner as under the Qualified Pension Plan if it begins to be paid after the normal retirement age.

Service is determined under the Supplemental Pension Plan in the same manner as under the Qualified Pension Plan, as described above.  The vesting scheduleparticipate in the Supplemental Pension Plan is the same asPlan. Messrs. Jones and King elected to discontinue their future active participation in the Qualified Pension Plan and allSupplemental Pension Plan, choosing instead to participate in the Qualified RAA effective January 1, 2006. M&T maintains a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that is designed to provide participants with contributions that cannot be provided under the Qualified RAA because of the NEOsInternal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit. For purposes of those contributions, compensation is capped at two times the annual Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit. For 2023, the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit was $330,000 resulting in a plan compensation maximum of $660,000. Messrs. Jones and King participated in the nonqualified deferred compensation plan in 2023 and were credited with a contribution for 2023 as reported below under the discussion of 2023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.

(5)

Ms. Meister and Messrs. Kay and Bible are 100% vestednot participants in their benefits in the Qualified Pension Plan or Supplemental Pension Plan.

Explanation of 2023 Pension Benefits Table. The 2023 Pension Benefits Table indicates, for each of the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan, the NEO’s number of years of credited service, present value of accumulated benefit and any payments made during the year ended December 31, 2023. See footnote (2) to the “2023 Summary Compensation Table.”

The amounts indicated in the column titled “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” represent the lump-sum value, as of December 31, 2023, of the annual benefit that was earned by the NEOs as of December 31, 2023, assuming payment begins at each executive’s normal retirement age, or their current age, if later. The normal retirement age is defined as age 65 in the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan. Certain assumptions were used to determine the present value of accumulated benefits payable at normal retirement age. Those assumptions are described in footnote (2) to the “2023 Summary Compensation Table.” Certain material terms of each of the Qualified Pension Plan and the Supplemental Pension Plan are summarized in the footnotes to the “2023 Pension Benefits Table” and in the narrative below.

Qualified Pension Plan. Benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan are paid over the lifetime of the NEO or the lifetimes of the NEO and a beneficiary, as elected by the NEO. If the NEO is married on the date payments are to begin under the Qualified Pension Plan, payment will be in the form of a joint and 50% survivor annuity with the spouse as beneficiary unless the NEO elects another form of payment with the consent of the spouse. None of the NEOs who are participants in the Qualified Pension Plan are eligible to elect to receive the benefit due under the Qualified Pension Plan in the form of a one-time lump sum payment. If benefits are paid in a form in which a benefit is to be paid to a beneficiary after the death of the NEO, benefits are reduced from the amount payable as a lifetime benefit solely to the NEO in accordance with the actuarial factors that apply to all participants in the Qualified Pension Plan. A participant’s benefit under the Qualified Pension Plan is generally payable as an annuity with monthly benefit payments. The Qualified Pension Plan benefits of all participants, including those benefits of NEOs, are payable from the assets held by an irrevocable, tax-exempt trust. In calculating a participant’s benefit, annual compensation in excess of the annual Internal Revenue Code 401(a)(17) limit may not be considered.

A participant is eligible for early retirement under the Qualified Pension Plan if the participant retires before normal retirement age but after attaining age 55 and completing 10 years of service. An early retirement benefit is reduced 4% per year for each year that the benefit commences prior to normal retirement age. At December 31, 2023, Mr. King was not eligible for early retirement and Messrs. Jones and Pearson were eligible for early retirement. Benefits under the Qualified Pension Plan are 100% vested after an employee has completed at least five years of service, and each NEO is 100% vested in his benefits in the Qualified Pension Plan.

Supplemental Pension Plan.

The Supplemental Pension Plan provides a benefit that is intended to make up for benefits that cannot be provided under the Qualified Pension Plan due to the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit. Under the Supplemental Pension Plan, compensation up to two times the annual Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit may be considered. For 2023, the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit was $330,000 resulting in a compensation maximum of $660,000.

72

A participant is eligible for early retirement under the Supplemental Pension Plan if the participant retires before normal retirement age but after attaining age 55 and completing 10 years of service.  An early retirement benefit is reduced 4% per year for each year that the benefit commences prior to normal retirement age.  At December 31, 2020,

LOGO


Generally, benefits under the Supplemental Pension Plan are paid over the lifetime of the NEO or the lifetimes of the NEO and a beneficiary, as elected by the NEO. The Supplemental Pension Plan allows a NEO to elect to receive the benefit due under the plan in the form of a one-time lump sum payment. If benefits are paid as a lump sum payment, benefits are adjusted from the amount payable as a lifetime benefit solely to the NEO in accordance with the actuarial factors that apply to all participants in the Qualified Pension Plan.

The pension benefit under the Supplemental Pension Plan is reduced in the same manner as under the Qualified Pension Plan if it begins to be paid before normal retirement age and continues to accrue in the same manner as under the Qualified Pension Plan if it begins to be paid after the normal retirement age.

Service is determined under the Supplemental Pension Plan in the same manner as under the Qualified Pension Plan, as described above. The vesting schedule in the Supplemental Pension Plan is the same as in the Qualified Pension Plan and all of the NEOs who are participants in the Supplemental Pension Plan are 100% vested in their benefits in the Supplemental Pension Plan.

A participant is eligible for early retirement under the Supplemental Pension Plan if the participant retires before normal retirement age but after attaining age 55 and completing 10 years of service. An early retirement benefit is reduced 4% per year for each year that the benefit commences prior to normal retirement age. At December 31, 2023, Messrs. Jones Gold and Pearson were eligible for early retirement, while Mr. King was not eligible for early retirement.

 

LOGO

73


Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table sets forth contributions, earnings and year-end balances for 2023 with respect to nonqualified deferred compensation for the NEOs.

2023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Name

 Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation
Component
 

Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
(1)

($)

  

Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
(2)

($)

  

Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
(3)

($)

  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
  

Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
(4)

($)

 

René F. Jones

 Leadership
Deferral/Match
  174,423   15,250   97,766   —    779,468 
 Leadership RAA  —    19,825   8,897   —    72,477 

Darren J. King

 Leadership
Deferral/Match
  234,827   15,250   289,993   —    1,450,315 
 Leadership RAA  —    15,250   33,580   —    187,444 

Kevin J. Pearson

 Leadership
Deferral/Match
  188,750   15,250   340,825   —    1,636,628 
 Leadership RAA  —    —    —    —    —  

Christopher E. Kay

 Leadership
Deferral/Match
  86,250   15,250   99,543   —    351,334 
 Leadership RAA  —    6,863   6,394       22,229 

Doris P. Meister

 Leadership
Deferral/Match
  151,000   —    19,508   —    323,393 
 Leadership RAA  —    8,388   577   —    22,990 

 

(1)

73


Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The following table setsexecutive contributions to the Leadership Deferral/Match component were based on the NEOs’ deferral elections and the salaries set forth contributions, earnings and year-end balances for 2020 with respect to nonqualified deferred compensation plans forin the NEOs.

2020 Nonqualified Deferred“2023 Summary Compensation

Name

Plan Name

Executive

Contributions

in Last FY(1) ($)

 

Registrant

Contributions

in Last FY(2) ($)

 

Aggregate

Earnings

in Last FY(3) ($)

 

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions ($)

 

Aggregate

Balance at

Last FYE(4) ($)

 

 

Leadership 401(k)

 

49,654

 

 

3,150

 

 

41,406

 

 

-

 

 

854,176

 

René F. Jones

Leadership RAA

 

-

 

 

4,025

 

 

922

 

 

-

 

 

92,446

 

 

Deferred Bonus Plan

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

Leadership 401(k)

 

102,491

 

 

3,150

 

 

98,002

 

 

-

 

 

628,670

 

Darren J. King

Leadership RAA

 

-

 

 

2,975

 

 

7,841

 

 

-

 

 

103,485

 

 

Deferred Bonus Plan

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

Leadership 401(k)

 

152,539

 

 

3,150

 

 

46,808

 

 

-

 

 

575,456

 

Richard S. Gold

Leadership RAA

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

Deferred Bonus Plan

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

Leadership 401(k)

 

190,673

 

 

3,150

 

 

(2,039

)

 

-

 

 

885,192

 

Kevin J. Pearson

Leadership RAA

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

Deferred Bonus Plan

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Doris P. Meister

Leadership 401(k)

 

64,000

 

 

3,150

 

 

13,001

 

 

-

 

 

99,828

 

 

Leadership RAA

 

-

 

 

1,575

 

 

430

 

 

-

 

 

3,921

 

(1)

The Leadership 401(k) Plan contributions were based on the NEOs’ deferral elections and the salaries set forth in the “2020 Summary Compensation Table.”  The salaries in the “2020 Table.” The salaries in the “2023 Summary Compensation Table” include these contributions.

(2)

This column represents M&T matching contributions made to the Leadership 401(k) Plan during 2020 by the NEOs and contributions by M&T to the Leadership RAA attributable to 2019 based on compensation earned and service performed during that year.  The contribution by M&T to the Leadership 401(k) Plan and the Leadership RAA attributable to 2020 was made after December 31, 2020 and is not reflected in the aggregate year-end balance for each NEO.  These values are reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column set forth in the “2020 Summary Compensation Table.”

(3)

This column reflects earnings or losses on plan balances in 2020.  Earnings may increase or decrease depending on the performance of the elected investment options.  Earnings on these plans are not “above-market” and thus are not reported in the “2020 Summary Compensation Table.”  Plan balances may be invested in various mutual funds and common stock.  Investment returns on those funds and common stock ranged from (22.09)% to 36.93% for the year ended December 31, 2020.

(4)

This column represents the year-end balances of the NEOs’ nonqualified deferred compensation accounts.  These balances include NEOs’ and M&T contributions that were included in the Summary Compensation Tables in previous years.  Amounts in this column include earnings that were not previously reported in the respective year’s Summary Compensation Table because they were not “above-market” earnings.

Overview of Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

M&T maintains the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan, a nonqualified deferred compensation plan.  See footnote (3) set forth above in the “2020 Summary Compensation Table” for information regarding M&T Bank’s contribution to the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan on behalf of each of the NEOs for 2020. Beginning in 2020, the Supplemental Retirement Savings Plan name was changedNEOs had the opportunity to also make deferrals from their cash STI compensation.

(2)

This column represents M&T matching contributions made by M&T attributable to 2022 based on compensation earned and service performed during the year. These contributions by M&T to the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan.Deferral/Match and the Leadership RAA components attributable to 2022 were made after December 31, 2022.

 

74

(3)


Leadership Retirement Savings Plan - Overview

The Leadership Retirement Savings Plan mirrorsThis column reflects earnings or losses on nonqualified deferred compensation account balances in 2023. Earnings may increase or decrease depending on the tax-qualified, defined contribution Retirement Savings Plan maintained by M&T in that it consists of two parts: (i) Leadership 401(k) Plan  and (ii) Leadership RAA.  The tax-qualified Retirement Savings Plan provides benefits under both portions up to the limit set by the Internal Revenue Code on compensation that can be recognized under a tax-qualified plan.  The Leadership Retirement Savings Plan provides unfunded, nonqualified benefits to select management based on compensation in excessperformance of the Internal Revenue Code limitelected investment options. Earnings on these plans are not “above-market” and thus are not reported in the “2023 Summary Compensation Table.” Plan balances may be invested in various mutual funds and common stock. Investment returns on those funds and common stock ranged from (1.44%) to 46.71% for tax-qualified plans up to a maximum creditable compensation level of $350,000. Beginning in 2020, M&T has amended the non-qualified retirement plans to allowyear ended December 31, 2023.

(4)

This column represents the maximum creditable compensation, including incentive compensation, to be increased from $350,000 to two times the annual IRS Compensation Limit, indexed annually.

Under the tax-qualified 401(k) (“Qualified 401(k) Plan”) portionyear-end balances of the Retirement Savings Plan, a participant may elect to contribute up to 50% of creditable planNEOs’ nonqualified deferred compensation in which event, the participant will be credited with a matching employer contribution equal to 100% ofaccounts. These balances include NEOs’ and M&T contributions that do not exceed 5% of the participant’s compensation.  All participants are always 100% vested in all contributionswere included in the Qualified 401(k) Plan.  All NEOs participateSummary Compensation Tables in the Qualified 401(k) Plan.

Under the Qualified RAA of the Retirement Savings Plan, a participant hired prior to December 31, 2020 will be credited with an employerprevious years; such contribution based on the participant’s years of service recognized under the plan foramounts were reported each year in which the participant is credited with at least 1,000 hours“All Other Compensation” column of servicethe Summary Compensation Table and is employedare quantified by M&T on December 31st of such year (or for such years where employment was terminated during the year due to retirement, death or disability).  Benefits under the Qualified RAA are subject to a five-year vesting schedule.  As explainedfootnote thereto. Amounts in this column include earnings that were not previously reported in the discussion of the “2020 Pension Benefitsrespective year’s Summary Compensation Table” Messrs. Jones and King participate in the Qualified RAA, and are fully vested in the benefits under the plan based on their years of service.  Ms. Meister became eligible to participate in the Qualified RAA in 2017 and is subject to a five-year vesting schedule.

Leadership Retirement Savings Plan - Leadership 401(k) Plan

The Leadership 401(k) Plan provides unfunded, nonqualified benefits to select members of management and highly compensated employees of M&T.  All of the NEOs participate in the Leadership 401(k) Plan.

For a given year, a participant may elect to contribute up to 50% of creditable plan compensation and the participant must elect the contribution percentage before the beginning of the year.  Creditable compensation under the Leadership 401(k) Plan is defined in the same way as under the Qualified Pension Plan, but it includes amounts deferred by participants under the Leadership 401(k) Plan and includes compensation credited under the tax-qualified 401(k) plan, the Retirement Savings Plan.  Beginning in 2020, the maximum creditable compensation, including incentive compensation, has been increased from $350,000 to two times the annual IRS Compensation Limit, indexed annually. Additionally, select members of management who contribute to the Leadership 401(k) Plan for a given year are credited with a matching employer contribution under the Leadership 401(k) Plan determined under the same matching formula as in the Qualified 401(k) Plan, which generally provides for a match equal to 100% of contributions that do because they were not exceed 5% of the participant’s compensation.“above-market” earnings.

Overview of Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans. M&T maintains the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan, a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. See footnote (3) to the “2023 Summary Compensation Table” for information regarding M&T Bank’s contribution to the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan on behalf of each of the NEOs for 2023.

Leadership Retirement Savings Plan—Overview

The Leadership Retirement Savings Plan is an unfunded, nonqualified defined contribution plan offered to select members of management and other highly compensated employees of M&T. It is intended to make up for benefits that cannot be provided under the Retirement Savings Plan due to the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit. It consists of three components— Leadership Deferral/Match, Leadership RAA and Leadership DEC—and provides benefits in excess of those provided under the Qualified 401(k) and Qualified RAA and DEC components of the Retirement Savings Plan, which are described below.

 

75

74

 


A participant is always 100% vested in both his or her own contributions and the employer matching contributions, and all earnings on both types of contributions under the Leadership 401(k) Plan.  The plan provides that a participant may elect to receive benefits at a specified age or date, upon separation from service, at death or disability, or at the earliest of these events.  A participant may elect to receive benefits in the form of a single lump sum or in annual installments payable over 5 or 10 years.  Elections are made with respect to each year’s contribution to the Leadership 401(k) Plan prior to the beginning of each year.  All payments from the Leadership 401(k) Plan are made in the form of cash.

Leadership Retirement Savings Plan - Leadership Retirement Accumulation AccountLOGO

The Leadership RAA portion of the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan is designed to provide participants with benefits that cannot be provided under our qualified plans as a result of limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.  Messrs. Jones and King participated in the Leadership RAA. Ms. Meister became eligible for the Leadership RAA in 2017.

For a given year, the Leadership RAA credits a contribution on behalf of a participant that is equal to the difference between (1) the contribution that would be provided on plan compensation under the Qualified RAA if the Internal Revenue Code limit did not exist up to the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan compensation limit of two times the annual IRC Compensation limit, indexed annually, and (2) the contribution actually provided under the Qualified RAA.  Mr. Jones was credited with $16,388 for the 2020 plan year.  Mr. King was credited with $14,250 for the 2020 plan year.  Ms. Meister received a benefit of $6,413 after becoming eligible for a contribution in the 2018 plan year, subject to a vesting schedule.  The book reserve accounts attributable to Leadership RAA contributions are subject to the same vesting schedule as the accounts in the Qualified RAA, and Messrs. Jones and King are fully vested in their Leadership RAA account.  Company contributions for 2020 under the Leadership RAA and the Leadership 401(k) Plan are credited to the participant’s bookkeeping account in the first quarter of 2021.  Service in the Leadership RAA is determined in the same manner as under the Qualified RAA.  These values are also reflected in the “Leadership Retirement Accumulation Account” column set forth in footnote (3) of the “2020


Under the tax-qualified 401(k) (the “Qualified 401(k)”) component of the Retirement Savings Plan, a participant may elect to contribute up to 50% of compensation (subject to the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit), in which event, the participant will be credited with a matching employer contribution equal to 100% of contributions that do not exceed 5% of the participant’s compensation. All participants are always 100% vested in all contributions in the Qualified 401(k) component of the Retirement Savings Plan. All NEOs participate in the Qualified 401(k) component of the Retirement Savings Plan.

Under the Qualified RAA component of the Retirement Savings Plan, a participant hired prior to December 31, 2019 will be credited with an employer contribution based on a percentage of compensation (subject to the Internal Revenue Code 401(a)(17) compensation limit) and the participant’s years of service recognized under the plan. The employer contribution will be made for each year in which the participant is credited with at least 1,000 hours of service and is employed by M&T on December 31st of such year (or for such years where employment was terminated during the year due to retirement, death or disability). Benefits under the Qualified RAA component are subject to a five-year vesting schedule. As explained in the discussion of the “2023 Pension Benefits Table,” Ms. Meister and Messrs. Jones and King participate in the Qualified RAA, and are fully vested in the Qualified RAA benefits based on their years of service. Mr. Kay became eligible to participate in the Qualified RAA in 2019 and became fully vested as of December 31, 2023.

Under the Qualified DEC component of the Retirement Savings Plan, a participant hired after December 31, 2019 will be credited with an employer contribution based on compensation (subject to the Internal Revenue Code 401(a)(17) compensation limit) multiplied by a discretionary contribution percentage, if any, determined by the bank from year to year. Mr. Bible received a DEC contribution based on 2023 eligible earnings.

Leadership Retirement Savings Plan—Leadership Deferral/Match

The Leadership Deferral/Match component of the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan is designed to provide compensation deferral opportunities and matching contributions that cannot be provided under the Qualified 401(k) component of the Retirement Savings Plan due to the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit. With the exception of Mr. Bible who was not eligible for the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan in 2023, all of the NEOs participate in the Leadership Deferral/Match component.

Under the Leadership Deferral/Match component, a participant may elect to contribute up to 50% of compensation, capped at two times the annual Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit. The participant must elect the contribution percentage before the beginning of the plan year. For 2023, the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit was $330,000 resulting in a compensation maximum of $660,000.

Additionally, select members of management who contribute to the Leadership Deferral/Match component for a given plan year and have maximized their Qualified 401(k) contributions are credited with a matching employer contribution under the Leadership Deferral/Match component, determined under the same matching formula as in the Qualified 401(k) component of the Retirement Savings Plan (equal to 100% of contributions that do not exceed 5% of the participant’s compensation). With the exception of Mr. Bible who was not eligible for the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan in 2023, all of the NEOs were credited with a maximum company matching contribution of $16,500 under the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan for the 2023 plan year. Company matching contributions for 2023 under the Leadership Deferral/Match component are credited to the participant’s bookkeeping account in the first quarter of 2024. These values are also reflected in the “Leadership Retirement Savings Plan” column set forth in footnote (3) of the “2023 Summary Compensation Table.”

 

76

LOGO

75


A participant is always 100% vested in both his own contributions and the employer matching contributions, and all earnings thereon under the Leadership Deferral/Match component. The Leadership Retirement Savings Plan provides that a participant may elect to receive benefits at a specified age or date, upon separation from service, at death or disability, or at the earliest of these events. A participant may elect to receive benefits in the form of a single lump sum or in annual installments payable over 5 or 10 years. Elections are made with respect to each year’s contribution to the Leadership Deferral/Match component prior to the beginning of each plan year. All payments from the Leadership Deferral/Match component are made in the form of cash.

Leadership Retirement Savings Plan—Leadership Retirement Accumulation Account and Leadership Discretionary Employer Contribution

The Leadership RAA component of the Leadership Retirement Savings Plan is designed to provide participants with benefits that cannot be provided under the Qualified RAA and DEC as a result of the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) compensation limit. Ms. Meister and Messrs. Jones, King and Kay participated in the Leadership RAA in the 2023 plan year. Mr. Kay became eligible for the Leadership RAA in 2019. Mr. Bible will be eligible for the Leadership DEC in the 2024 plan year.

For a given plan year, the Leadership RAA and DEC component credits a contribution on behalf of a participant that is equal to the difference between (1) the contribution that would be provided based on the participant’s compensation under the Qualified RAA and DEC if the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit did not exist, up to two times the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17) limit, and (2) the contribution actually provided under the Qualified RAA and DEC. Mr. Jones was credited with a Leadership RAA contribution of $21,450 for the 2023 plan year. Mr. King was credited with Leadership RAA contribution of $16,500 for the 2023 plan year. Ms. Meister received a Leadership RAA contribution of $9,075 for the 2023 plan year and Mr. Kay received a Leadership RAA contribution of $7,425 for the 2023 plan year. The book reserve accounts attributable to Leadership RAA contributions are subject to the same vesting schedule as the accounts in the Qualified RAA, and Ms. Meister and Messrs. Jones, King and Kay are fully vested in their Leadership RAA account. Company contributions for 2023 under the Leadership RAA are credited to the participant’s bookkeeping account in the first quarter of 2024. Service crediting for the Leadership RAA is determined in the same manner as under the Qualified RAA. These values are also reflected in the “Leadership Retirement Accumulation Account” column set forth in footnote (3) of the “2023 Summary Compensation Table.”

 

76

 


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table indicates the potential post-employment payments and benefits for the NEOs in the events indicated below as though termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2020.LOGO


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table indicates the potential post-employment payments and benefits for the NEOs in the events indicated below as though termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2023.

M&T maintains certain arrangements, plans and programs under which our NEOs would be eligible to receive severance payments and other benefits upon termination of employment or a change in control of the company. M&T also sponsors a number of broad-based health, life and disability benefit programs for its employees, in which the NEOs also participate, such as short- and long-term disability coverage and group term life insurance coverage, which are not included below.

While our plans provide for the payout amounts indicated below, actual amounts that M&T may pay out and the assumptions used in arriving at such amount can only be determined at the time of such executive’s termination or change in control and could differ materially from the amounts set forth below. Our plans do not provide for any payment at, following or in connection with a termination for cause.

2023 Post-Employment Benefits

Name

  

Involuntary /
without cause
(1)

($)

   

Death /
Disability
(2)

($)

   

Retirement(3)

($)

   

Change in
Control
(4)

($)

 

René F. Jones(5)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   2,241,163    —     —     2,241,163 

LTI(6)

   5,947,887    8,179,755    8,179,755    8,179,755 

Total 

   8,189,050    8,179,755    8,179,755    10,420,918 

Daryl Bible(7)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   1,521,774    —     —     1,521,774 

LTI(6)

   2,450,442    2,450,442    —     2,450,442 

Total 

   3,972,216    2,450,442    —     3,972,216 

Darren J. King(5)(7)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   1,438,552    —     —     1,438,552 

LTI(6)

   1,813,821    2,504,772    —     2,504,772 

Total 

   3,252,373    2,504,772    —     3,943,324 

Kevin J. Pearson(5)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   1,592,024    —     —     1,592,024 

LTI(6)

   2,656,067    3,613,811    3,613,811    3,613,811 

Total 

   4,248,091    3,613,811    3,613,811    5,205,835 

Christopher E. Kay(5)(7)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   1,489,926    —     —     1,489,926 

LTI(6)

   1,544,380    2,092,721    —     2,092,721 

Total 

   3,034,306    2,092,721    —     3,582,647 

Doris Meister(5)(8)

                    

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

   1,645,255    —     —     1,645,255 

LTI(6)

   1,536,032    2,131,243    2,131,243    2,131,243 

Total 

   3,181,287    2,131,243    2,131,243    3,776,498 

(1)

In the event of an involuntary termination without cause (i) unvested PVSUs will accelerate at target, but the payout will be prorated to reflect number of broad-based health, lifemonths of service provided over the 36-month performance period; (ii) unvested PHSUs will accelerate at target and disability benefit programs(iii) NQ Stock Options continue to vest for its employees, in which the NEOs also participate, such as short- and long-term disability coverage and group term life insurance coverage, which are not included below.  

While our plans provide for the payout amounts indicated below, actual amounts that M&T may pay outone year following termination and the assumptions used in arriving at such amount can only be determined atexercise period ends on the timeearlier of such executive’sone year following termination or change in controlthe original 10-year expiration date.

LOGO

77


(2)

All vesting restrictions lapse immediately upon death or disability at target.

(3)

For employees who resign and could differ materially fromare retirement eligible (defined as having reached age 55 with 10 or more years of service or as otherwise provided under an employee’s equity award agreement) (i) all vesting restrictions on PHSUs lapse immediately and (ii) PVSUs and NQ Stock Options continue to vest pursuant to their original vesting schedule and the amounts set forth below.  Our plans do not provideexercise period for any payment at,NQ Stock Options ends on the earlier of 4 years following retirement or in connection with a termination for cause.the original 10 year expiration date.

2020 Post-Employment Benefits

 

Name

Involuntary /

without cause (1) ($)

 

Death /

Disability (2) ($)

 

Retirement (3) ($)

 

Change in

Control (4) ($)

 

René F. Jones (5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

 

2,030,246

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

2,030,246

 

LTI (6)

 

1,896,644

 

 

3,970,857

 

 

3,970,857

 

 

3,970,857

 

Total

 

3,926,890

 

 

3,970,857

 

 

3,970,857

 

 

6,001,103

 

Darren J. King (5)(7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

 

1,397,581

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

1,397,581

 

LTI (6)

 

696,859

 

 

1,435,337

 

 

-

 

 

1,651,433

 

Total

 

2,094,440

 

 

1,435,337

 

 

-

 

 

3,049,014

 

Richard S. Gold (5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

 

1,559,241

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

1,559,241

 

LTI (6)

 

1,175,793

 

 

2,476,866

 

 

2,476,866

 

 

2,476,866

 

Total

 

2,735,034

 

 

2,476,866

 

 

2,476,866

 

 

4,036,107

 

Kevin J. Pearson (5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

 

1,565,065

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

1,565,065

 

LTI (6)

 

1,148,234

 

 

2,394,191

 

 

2,394,191

 

 

2,394,191

 

Total

 

2,713,299

 

 

2,394,191

 

 

2,394,191

 

 

3,959,256

 

Doris P. Meister (5)(7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance and Health Benefit Coverage

 

1,640,872

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

1,640,872

 

LTI (6)

 

643,609

 

 

1,411,563

 

 

-

 

 

1,411,563

 

Total

 

2,284,481

 

 

1,411,563

 

 

-

 

 

3,052,435

 

(4)

(1)

In the event of an involuntary termination without cause (i) unvested PVSUs will accelerate at target, but the payout will be prorated to reflect number of months of service provided over the 36-month performance period; (ii) unvested PHSUs granted under the 2009 Equity Incentive Compensation plan are forfeited, while unvested PHSUs granted under the 2019 Equity Incentive Compensation plan accelerate vesting at target and (iii) NQ Stock Options continue to vest for one year following termination and the exercise period ends on the earlier of 1 year following termination or the original 10-year expiration date.

(2)

All vesting restrictions lapse immediately upon death or disability at target.

(3)

For employees who resign and are retirement eligible (defined as having reached age 55 with 10 or more years of service) (i) all vesting restrictions on PHSUs lapse immediately and (ii) PVSUs and NQ Stock Options continue to vest pursuant to their original vesting schedule and the exercise period ends on the earlier of 4 years following retirement or the original 10 year expiration date.

(4)

In the event of a change in control, all vesting restrictions will lapse. With respect to the PVSUs, the payout will be at an amount equal to the greater of target or actual performance, calculated as of the quarter end immediately prior to the change in control announcement. For purposes of this disclosure, a payout at target is assumed. Cash severance is payable only upon a termination of employment.

77


(5)

See the “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” column to the “2020 Pension Benefits” table and the “Aggregate Balance at Last FYE” column of the “2020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table for additional payments upon termination.  Ms. Meister is not fully vested in her Non-Qualified deferred compensation benefits.

(6)

Value computed for each stock option grant by multiplying (i) the difference between (a)127.30, the closing market price of a share of our common stock on December 31, 2020 and (b) the exercise price per share for that option granted by (ii) the number of shares subject to each option that vests or continues to vest. PHSUs and PVSUs are valued at target based on the closing market price of a share of our common stock on December 31, 2020.

(7)

Neither Mr. King nor Ms. Meister are retirement eligible.

Severance Pay Plan

M&T maintains the Severance Pay Plan, which is a broad-based, tiered severance plan that provides eligible employees with post-employment severance payments and the continuation of certain employee benefits when a “Qualifying Event” (defined as any permanent, involuntary termination of a participant’s active employment as a result of a reduction in force, restructuring, outsourcing or elimination of position) occurs.  The amount of severance an employee is eligible to receive is based upon the employee’s position and years of service.  Each NEO participates in the plan.  Upon the occurrence of a Qualifying Event, each NEO will be entitled to:

the continuation of his or her cash base salary for 104 weeks as determined at the time of the Qualifying Event; and

the continuation of certain benefits during the period in which severance payments are made, for those benefits that the NEO has elected at the time of the Qualifying Event, which may include medical, dental, vision and life insurance, and flexible spending accounts, provided the NEO continues to make contributions at the active employee rate.

Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards

As a general matter, all employees, including the NEOs, would be immediately vested in any unvested equity awards at the time of a change in control, death and disability. Unvested shares of performance-hurdled equity awards granted to the NEOs will also vest automatically at retirement. Unvested shares of performance-vested equity awards will vest automatically at target in the case of death or disability, at the greater of target or actual performance, incalculated as of the event of aquarter end immediately prior to the change in control announcement. For purposes of this disclosure, a payout at target is assumed. Cash severance is payable only upon a termination of employment.

(5)

See the “Present Value of Accumulated Benefit” column of the “2023 Pension Benefits” table and will continue vesting into retirement,the “Aggregate Balance at Last FYE” column of the “2023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” table for additional payments upon termination.

(6)

Value computed for each stock option grant by multiplying (i) the difference between (a) $137.08, the closing market price of a share of our common stock on December 29, 2023 and (b) the exercise price per share for that option granted by (ii) the number of shares subject to actual performance accordingeach option that vests or continues to vest. PHSUs and PVSUs are valued at target based on the original payout schedule. The NQ Stock Options also continueclosing market price of a share of our common stock on December 29, 2023.

(7)

Messrs. Bible, King and Kay are not retirement eligible.

(8)

On February 9, 2024, M&T and Ms. Meister entered in a Retirement and Consulting Agreement in connection with Ms. Meister’s transition to vest according toa consulting role with the original schedule upon retirement,company, which will be effective on or about May 31, 2024. See “Compensation Discussion and the exercise period is shortened to the lesser of four years post retirement or the remaining original term.  See also footnote (3) to the table titled “2020Analysis—Individual Performance Assessments—Ms. Meister’s Retirement and Consulting Agreement” for information on Ms. Meister’s post-employment benefits in connection with her pending retirement.

Severance Pay Plan

M&T maintains the Severance Pay Plan, which is a broad-based, tiered severance plan that provides eligible employees with post-employment severance payments and the continuation of certain employee benefits when a “Qualifying Event” (defined as any permanent, involuntary termination of a participant’s active employment as a result of a reduction in force, restructuring, outsourcing or elimination of position) occurs. The amount of severance an employee is eligible to receive is based upon the employee’s position and years of service. Each NEO participates in the plan. Upon the occurrence of a Qualifying Event, each NEO will be entitled to:

the continuation of his or her cash base salary for 104 weeks as determined at the time of the Qualifying Event; and

the continuation of certain benefits for up to the first 18 months in which severance payments are made, for those benefits that the NEO has elected at the time of the Qualifying Event, which may include medical, dental, vision and life insurance, and flexible spending accounts, provided the NEO continues to make contributions at the active employee rate.

Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards

As a general matter, all employees, including the NEOs, would be immediately vested in any unvested equity awards at the time of a change in control, death and disability. Unvested shares of PHSUs granted to the NEOs will also vest automatically at retirement. Unvested shares of PVSUs will vest automatically at target in the case of death or disability, at the greater of target or actual performance in the event of a change in control, and will continue vesting into retirement, subject to actual performance according to the original payout schedule. The NQ Stock Options also continue to vest according to the original schedule upon retirement, and the exercise period is shortened to the lesser of four years post-retirement or the remaining original term. See also footnote (3) to the table titled “2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards.”

 

78

78

 


PROPOSAL 3

PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF M&T BANK CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021LOGO

On February 16, 2021, the Audit Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, certified public accountants, as the independent registered public accounting firm


Pay Versus Performance Disclosure
In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we provide the following disclosure regarding executive compensation for our principal executive officer (“PEO,” also known as our CEO), and other NEOs and company performance for the fiscal years listed below. The C&HC Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for any of the years shown. Pursuant to SEC rules, the information in this “
Pay Versus Performance Disclosure
” section shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any M&T filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, unless expressly incorporated by specific reference in such filing.
Pay Versus Performance Table
Year
  
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
René F. Jones¹
($)
   
Compensation
Actually Paid to
René F. Jones¹,²,³
($)
   
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO NEOs
1

($)
   
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO

NEOs
1,2,3

($)
   
Value of Initial Fixed
$100 Investment
based on:
4
   
Net
Income
($ Millions)
   
Return on
Tangible
Common
Equity
5
 
  
TSR
($)
   
Peer Group
TSR
($)
 
(a)
  
(b)
   
(c)
   
(d)
   
(e)
   
(f)
   
(g)
   
(h)
   
(i)
 
2023   9,385,557    9,677,118    3,852,702    3,883,837    92.38    96.65    2,741    17.6
2022   8,815,707    8,747,318    4,052,188    4,106,681    93.94    97.52    1,992    16.7
2021   6,868,174    9,143,656    3,554,911    4,583,251    96.83    124.06    1,859    16.8
2020   5,532,007    3,876,327    3,254,389    2,358,820    77.91    89.69    1,353    12.8
1.
Mr. Jones was our PEO for each year presented. The individuals comprising the
non-PEO
NEOs for each year presented are listed below.
2020—2021
 
2022
  
2023
Darren J. King Darren J. King  Daryl Bible
Richard S. Gold Richard S. Gold  Darren J. King
Kevin J. Pearson Kevin J. Pearson  Kevin J. Pearson
Doris P. Meister Christopher E. Kay  Christopher E. Kay
     Doris P. Meister
2.
The amounts shown for Compensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K
and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized, or received by M&T’s NEOs. These amounts reflect the Summary Compensation Table Total with certain adjustments as described in footnote 3 below.
3.Compensation Actually Paid reflects the exclusions and inclusions of certain amounts for the PEO and the other NEOs as set forth below. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and valuation assumptions do not differ materially from those disclosed as of the grant date of the equity awards. Amounts in the Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards column are the totals from the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. Amounts in the Exclusion of Change in Pension Value column reflect the amounts attributable to the Change in Pension Value reported in the Summary Compensation Table. Amounts in the Inclusion of Pension Service Cost are based on the service cost for services rendered during the listed year.
Year
  
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Exclusion of
Change in Pension
Value for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Exclusion of Stock
Awards and
Option Awards for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Inclusion of
Pension Service
Cost for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Inclusion of Equity
Values for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Compensation
Actually Paid to
René F. Jones
($)
 
2023   9,385,557    (11,982   (6,000,130   —     6,303,673    9,677,118 
2022   8,815,707    —     (5,300,278   —     5,231,889    8,747,318 
2021   6,868,174    —     (4,250,256   —     6,525,738    9,143,656 
2020   5,532,007    (66,115   (3,550,087   —     1,960,522    3,876,327 
LOGO
79

Year
  
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
   
Average
Exclusion of
Change in Pension
Value for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
   
Average
Exclusion of Stock
Awards and
Option Awards for
Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
   
Average
Inclusion of
Pension Service
Cost for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
   
Average
Inclusion of Equity
Values for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
   
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
 
2023   3,852,702    (33,416   (2,045,257   15,680    2,094,128    3,883,837 
2022   4,052,188    —     (1,875,129   50,522    1,879,100    4,106,681 
2021   3,554,911    (44,980   (1,794,940   51,600    2,816,660    4,583,251 
2020   3,254,389    (186,823   (1,697,711   44,846    944,119    2,358,820 
The amounts in the Inclusion of Equity Values in the tables above are derived from the amounts set forth in the following tables:
Year
  
Year-End Fair

Value of Equity
Awards Granted
During Year
That Remained
Unvested as of
Last Day of
Year for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Change in Fair
Value from Last
Day of Prior
Year to Last Day
of Year of
Unvested Equity
Awards Granted
in Prior Years for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Vesting-Date

Fair Value of
Equity Awards
Granted
During Year
that Vested
During Year for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Change in Fair
Value from Last
Day of Prior Year
to Vesting Date of
Unvested Equity
Awards Granted
in Prior Years that
Vested During
Year for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Fair Value at
Last Day of
Prior Year of
Equity
Awards
Forfeited
During Year for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Value of
Dividends or
Other Earnings
Paid on Equity
Awards Not
Otherwise
Included for
René F. Jones
($)
   
Total -
Inclusion
of Equity
Values for
René F. Jones
($)
 
2023   5,237,834    (110,045   —     1,175,884    —     —     6,303,673 
2022   4,560,864    (10,132   —     681,157    —     —     5,231,889 
2021   5,243,324    912,355    —     370,059    —     —     6,525,738 
2020   2,537,896    (542,301   —     (35,073   —     —     1,960,522 
Year
 
Average
Year-End Fair

Value of Equity
Awards Granted
During Year
That Remained
Unvested as of
Last Day of
Year for
Non-PEO
NEOs
($)
  
Average
Change in Fair
Value from Last
Day of Prior
Year to Last Day
of Year of
Unvested Equity
Awards Granted
in Prior Years for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
  
Average
Vesting-Date
Fair Value of
Equity Awards
Granted
During Year
that Vested
During Year for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
  
Average
Change in Fair
Value from Last
Day of Prior Year
to Vesting Date of
Unvested Equity
Awards Granted
in Prior Years that
Vested During
Year for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
  
Average
Fair Value at
Last Day of
Prior Year of
Equity
Awards
Forfeited
During Year for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
  
Average
Value of
Dividends or
Other Earnings
Paid on Equity
Awards Not
Otherwise
Included for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
  
Total -
Average
Inclusion
of Equity
Values for
Non-PEO NEOs

($)
 
2023  1,848,301   (53,473  —    299,300   —    —    2,094,128 
2022  1,613,539   (8,580  —    274,141   —    —    1,879,100 
2021  2,214,324   429,158   —    173,178   —    —    2,816,660 
2020  1,221,813   (259,702  —    (17,992  —    —    944,119 
4.
The Peer Group TSR set forth in this table utilizes the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index (assuming reinvestment of all dividends), which we also utilize in the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation
S-K
included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year endingended December 31, 2021, a capacity in which it has served since 1984.

Although shareholder approval2023. The comparison assumes $100 was invested for the period starting December 31, 2019, through the end of the appointmentlisted year in the company and in the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index, respectively, and assumes reinvestment of all dividends. Historical stock performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.

5.
We determined Return on Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE) to be the most important financial performance measure used to link company performance to Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and
Non-PEO
NEOs in 2022 and 2023. This performance measure may not have been the most important financial performance measure for years 2021 and 2020 and we may determine a different financial performance measure to be the most important financial performance measure in future years. ROTCE is computed by dividing net operating income available to common equity by average tangible common equity. Net operating income available to common equity is computed by taking net income available to common equity and adding back the
after-tax
effect of the independent registered public accounting firmamortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, adding back the
after-tax
effects of merger-related expenses, and subtracting the
after-tax
effects of merger-related gains. Average tangible common equity is not requiredcomputed by law, M&T believes that it is desirable to request that the shareholders ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as M&T’s independent registered public accounting firmtaking average common equity for the year ending December 31, 2021.  Inapplicable period and subtracting average goodwill and average core deposit and other intangible assets (net of any related average deferred tax amounts). The C&HC Committee and management use these
non-GAAP
financial measures as they believe they better reflect the impact of acquisition activity in reported results. See
Appendix A
for a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with these corresponding
non-GAAP
amounts.
80
LOGO

Description of Relationship Between PEO and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid, Company Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) and KBW NASDAQ Bank Index TSR
The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, the company’s cumulative TSR, and the TSR of the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index over the four most recently completed fisca
l years.
Description of Relationship Between PEO and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income
The fo
llowing chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO,
the
average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our Net Income during the four most recently completed fiscal years.
LOGO
LOGO
81

Description of Relationship Between PEO and Other NEO Compensation Actually Paid and ROTCE
The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our other NEOs, and our ROTCE during the four most recently completed fiscal years. See
Appendix A
for a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with these corresponding
non-GAAP
amounts
.
LOGO
Tabular List of Most Important Financial Performance Measures
The following table presents the financial performance measures that the company considers to have been the most important in linking Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and other NEOs for 2023 to company performance. The measures in this table are not ranked.
Net Operating Income
Earnings Per Share
Return on Tangible Common Equity
82
LOGO


 PROPOSAL 3

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF M&T BANK CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2024

On February 20, 2024, the Audit Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, certified public accountants, as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2024, a capacity in which it has served since 1984.

Although shareholder approval of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm is not required by law, M&T believes that it is desirable to request that the shareholders ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as M&T’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024. In the event that the shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment and make a determination that the shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider this appointment and make such a determination as it believes to be in M&T’s and its shareholders’ best interests. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in M&T’s and its shareholders’ best interests.

Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the virtual Annual Meeting. The representatives may, if they wish, make a statement and, it is expected, will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION
OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF M&T BANK CORPORATION FOR THE
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION

OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF M&T BANK CORPORATION FOR THE

YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2024.

 

79


INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

The following is a summary of the fees billed to M&T by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services rendered during 2020 and 2019, which are categorized in accordance with the SEC’s rules as follows:LOGO

 

Fees to Independent Auditors

83

 

 

2020 ($)

2019 ($)

 

Audit Fees

5,358,990

 

4,592,940

 

Audit-Related Fees

1,169,000

 

955,200

 

Tax Fees

146,408

 

95,000

 

All Other Fees

7,743

 

7,743

 

Total

6,682,141

 

5,650,883

 

 

Audit Fees

Audit fees consist of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for services rendered for the audit of M&T’s annual consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, for its review of M&T’s quarterly consolidated financial statements during 2020 and 2019, and for other audit and attest services in connection with statutory and regulatory filings as of and for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees consist of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for audit-related services, including audits of employee benefit plans and other attest services that are not required by statute or regulation for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.  Of the audit-related fees billed for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, all services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Tax Fees

Tax fees consist of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for tax compliance, planning and consulting for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.  Of the tax fees billed for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, all services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

All Other Fees

All other fees for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 consisted of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP primarily for research software licensing.  All fees billed in this category for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

In addition to the above services, for the year ended December 31, 2020, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP billed $65,300 for a mortgage servicing report that was reimbursed by an outside mortgage company, and directly billed certain investment funds sponsored by a subsidiary of M&T a total of $254,186 for tax return preparation services, audit services and Form 5500 preparation fees.  Likewise, for the year ended December 31, 2019, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP billed $63,400 for a mortgage servicing report that was reimbursed by an outside mortgage company, directly billed certain trusts, for which a subsidiary of M&T was the trustee, $328,600 for tax return preparation services, and directly billed certain investment funds sponsored by a subsidiary of M&T a total of $411,175


INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The following is a summary of the fees billed to M&T by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for professional services rendered during 2023 and 2022, which are categorized in accordance with the SEC’s rules as follows:

Fees to Independent Auditors

    2023 ($)   2022 ($) 

Audit Fees

   7,567,221    8,714,596 

Audit-Related Fees

   1,820,528    1,484,641 

Tax Fees

   428,793    258,137 

All Other Fees

   2,175    979 

Total

   9,818,717    10,458,353 

Audit Fees

Audit fees consist of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for services rendered for the audit of M&T’s annual consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, for its review of M&T’s quarterly consolidated financial statements during 2023 and 2022, and for other audit and attest services in connection with statutory and regulatory filings as of and for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees consist of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for audit-related services, including audits of employee benefit plans and other attest services that are not required by statute or regulation for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. Of the audit-related fees billed for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, all services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Tax Fees

Tax fees consist of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for tax compliance, planning and consulting for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. Of the tax fees billed for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, all services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

All Other Fees

All other fees for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 consisted of fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for accounting disclosure software licensing. All fees billed in this category for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

In addition to the above services, for the year ended December 31, 2023, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP billed $77,607 for a mortgage servicing report that was reimbursed by an outside mortgage company, directly billed certain trusts, for which a subsidiary of M&T was the trustee, $278,600 for tax return preparation services, and directly billed certain investment funds sponsored by a subsidiary of M&T a total of $522,500 for audit services and Form 5500 preparation fees. Likewise, for the year ended December 31, 2022, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP billed $74,622 for a mortgage servicing report that was reimbursed by an outside mortgage company, directly billed certain trusts, for which a subsidiary of M&T was trustee, $258,600 for tax return preparation services, and directly billed certain investment funds sponsored by a subsidiary of M&T a total of $526,345 for audit services and Form 5500 preparation fees.

 

80

84

 


The Audit Committee has determined that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s provision of professional services is compatible with maintaining its independence.  No fees were billed, and no services were provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during 2020 and 2019 for financial information systems design and implementation. No other fees were billed for any other services and no other services were provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Beginning with the year ended December 31, 2003, M&T instituted a policy that the Audit Committee pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.  These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services.  Pre-approval is generally detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget range.  The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval policy, and the fees for the services performed to date.  The Audit Committee may also pre-approve additional services on a case-by-case basis.  In the period between scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee, the Chair of the Audit Committee is authorized to pre-approve such services on behalf of the Audit Committee provided that such pre-approval is reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Before appointing PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee considered PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s qualifications as an independent registered public accounting firm.  This included a review of the qualifications of the engagement team, the quality control procedures the firm has established, any issues raised by the most recent quality control review of the firm, as well as its reputation for integrity and competence in the fields of accounting and auditing.  The Audit Committee’s review also included matters required to be considered under the SEC’s rules on auditor independence, including the nature and extent of non-audit services, to ensure that the auditor’s independence will not be impaired.  The Audit Committee has considered and determined that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s provision of non-audit services to M&T during 2020 is compatible with and did not impair PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence.

Report of the Audit Committee

 

LOGO


The Audit Committee has determined that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s provision of professional services is compatible with maintaining its independence. No fees were billed and no services were provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP during 2023 and 2022 for financial information systems design and implementation.

No other fees were billed for any other services and no other services were provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Beginning with the year ended December 31, 2003, M&T instituted a policy that the Audit Committee pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget range. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval policy, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve additional services on a case-by-case basis. In the period between scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee, the Chair of the Audit Committee is authorized to pre-approve such services on behalf of the Audit Committee provided that such pre-approval is reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Before appointing PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Audit Committee considered PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s qualifications as an independent registered public accounting firm. This included a review of the qualifications of the engagement team, the quality control procedures the firm has established, any issues raised by the most recent quality control review of the firm, as well as its reputation for integrity and competence in the fields of accounting and auditing. The Audit Committee’s review also included matters required to be considered under the SEC’s rules on auditor independence, including the nature and extent of non-audit services, to ensure that the auditor’s independence will not be impaired. The Audit Committee has considered and determined that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s provision of non-audit services to M&T during 2023 is compatible with and did not impair PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence.

Report of the Audit Committee

The members of the Audit Committee are independent as that term is defined in the listing standards of the NYSE. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board. A copy of such charter can be accessed on M&T’s website at ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance. During 2023, the Audit Committee met 14 times, and held discussions with management and representatives of its independent registered public accounting firm consistent with its responsibilities under its charter.

Management is responsible for the preparation of M&T’s consolidated financial statements and their assessment of the design and effectiveness of M&T’s internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Audit Committee are independent as that term is defined in the listing standards of the NYSE.  The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.  A copy of such charter can be accessed on M&T’s website at https://ir.mtb.com/corporate-governance.  During 2020, the Audit Committee met six times, and held discussions with management and representatives of its independent registered public accounting firm consistent with its responsibilities under its charter.

Management is responsible for the preparation of M&T’s consolidated financial statements and their assessment of the design and effectiveness of M&T’s internal control over financial reporting.  The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of

M&T’s consolidated financial statements and opining on the effectiveness of those controls in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and issuing its reports thereon. As provided in its charter, the Audit Committee’s responsibilities include monitoring and overseeing these processes.

 

81


In discharging its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed M&T’s 2020 audited consolidated financial statements with management and its independent registered public accounting firm and has reviewed and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC, which include, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of M&T’s consolidated financial statements.

 

The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from M&T’s independent registered public accounting firm as required by the PCAOB’s Ethics and Independence Rule 3526 (Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence) and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm theirLOGO

85


In discharging its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed M&T’s 2023 audited consolidated financial statements with management and its independent registered public accounting firm and has reviewed and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC, which include, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of M&T’s consolidated financial statements.

The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from M&T’s independent registered public accounting firm as required by the PCAOB’s Ethics and Independence Rule 3526 (Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence) and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence.

Based on these reviews and discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements and report on management’s assessment of the design and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting be included in M&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 to be filed with the SEC on or about February 21, 2024. The Audit Committee also selected the independent registered public accounting firm.

This report was adopted on February 20, 2024 by the Audit Committee of the Board:

Denis J. Salamone, Chair

William F. Cruger, Jr.

T. Jefferson Cunningham III

Herbert L. Washington

In accordance with and to the extent permitted by applicable law or regulation, the information contained in the Report of the Audit Committee of M&T Bank Corporation shall not be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act and shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

NOTICE PURSUANT TO SECTION 726(d) OF THE NEW YORK BUSINESS CORPORATION LAW

On May 1, 2023, M&T renewed and extended its directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy until May 1, 2024. The premium, including commissions, for the extension and annual renewal is $5,717,286. The primary policy is issued by U.S. Specialty Insurance Company and covers all directors and officers of M&T and its subsidiaries.

OTHER MATTERS

 

Based on these reviews and discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements and report on management’s assessment of the design and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting be included in M&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 to be filed with the SEC on or about February 16, 2021.  The Audit Committee also selected the independent registered public accounting firm.

This report was adopted on February 16, 2021 by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:

C. Angela Bontempo, Chair

Richard A. Grossi

Denis J. Salamone

David S. Scharfstein

Herbert L. Washington

In accordance with and to the extent permitted by applicable law or regulation, the information contained in the Report of the Audit Committee of M&T Bank Corporation shall not be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act and shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

NOTICE PURSUANT TO SECTION 726(d) OF THE NEW YORK BUSINESS CORPORATION LAW

On October 1, 2020, M&T extended and subsequently renewed its directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy until October 1, 2021.  The premium, including commissions, for the extension and annual renewal is $8,655,824.71.  The primary policy is issued by U.S. Specialty Insurance Company and covers all directors and officers of M&T and its subsidiaries.

OTHER MATTERS

The Board of Directors of M&T is not aware of any matters not referred to in this proxy statement that will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy to vote the shares represented thereby in accordance with their best judgment.

 

86

 

LOGO


GENERAL INFORMATION—QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Why am I being provided this proxy statement?

M&T is providing this proxy statement to you because its Board is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares of M&T common stock at the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. This proxy statement contains information about matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting and certain other information required by the SEC and the NYSE.

We are first making available this proxy statement and the accompanying form of proxy on or about March 5, 2024, to M&T common stock shareholders of record as of February 22, 2024. A copy of M&T’s message to shareholders and Form 10-K, including financial statements, which together comprise our annual report for the year 2023, are being made available along with this proxy statement but are not part of this proxy statement.

When and where will the Annual Meeting be held?

The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 16, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time. We are holding this year’s Annual Meeting in a virtual meeting format. There is no physical location for the meeting.

Who is entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Common shareholders of record at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 22, 2024 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On February 22, 2024, M&T had outstanding 166,620,984 shares of common stock, $0.50 par value per share. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. Shares may not be voted at the Annual Meeting unless the owner is present or represented by proxy, as more fully explained in this proxy statement.

How do I attend, vote and ask questions at the Annual Meeting?

You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting if, as of the close of business on February 22, 2024, you held shares of M&T common stock registered in your name (a “Registered Holder”), or you held shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, and have a valid legal proxy for the Annual Meeting (a “Beneficial Holder”).

If you are a Registered Holder or Beneficial Holder, you will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, ask questions and vote during the meeting by visiting meetnow.global/MKWPZGK and following the instructions. Please have your control number, which can be found on your proxy card, notice or email previously received, to access the meeting. Please review this information prior to the Annual Meeting to ensure you have access.

We encourage shareholders to visit the meeting website above in advance of the Annual Meeting to familiarize themselves with the online access process. While we expect that the vast majority of Beneficial Holders will be able to fully participate using the control number received with their voting instruction form, there is no guarantee this option will be available for every type of Beneficial Holders’ voting control numbers. Beneficial Holders also have the option to register in advance of the Annual Meeting as described more fully below. The virtual Annual Meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (except Internet Explorer) and devices that are equipped with the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Shareholders should verify their internet connection prior to the Annual Meeting.

Shareholders encountering difficulty with the Annual Meeting virtual platform during the sign-in process or at any time during the meeting may utilize technical support provided by M&T through Computershare by calling 1-888-724-2416. Technical support information also is provided on the sign-in page for all shareholders.

 

82


 

LOGO

87


Shareholders will have substantially the same opportunities to participate in our virtual Annual Meeting as they would have at an in-person meeting. Shareholders as of the record date will be able to attend, vote, examine the shareholder list, and submit questions during a portion of the meeting via the online platform. Shareholders may also submit questions in advance of the Annual Meeting by sending them via email to: ir@mtb.com. Please send any questions in advance of the Annual Meeting by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, April 12, 2024.

Questions that comply with the Annual Meeting’s rules of conduct and that are germane to the purpose of the Annual Meeting will be answered during the meeting, subject to time constraints. If there are questions regarding matters of personal concern to the shareholder or if a question posed is not answered, M&T’s Market & Investor Relations Department will respond after the Annual Meeting. If we receive substantially similar questions from multiple shareholders, we may group them together. Prior to the Annual Meeting, the meeting website will contain details on other procedures and guidelines relevant to the Annual Meeting as well as technical support information.

Even if you intend to be present at the virtual Annual Meeting, to ensure your shares are represented, please vote your shares in advance of the meeting over the internet or by telephone, or complete and return a physical proxy card by mail.

Do I have to register in advance of the Annual Meeting if I want to attend?

If you are a Beneficial Holder, you may choose to register before the Annual Meeting by submitting proof of your proxy power (“Legal Proxy”) reflecting your M&T holdings along with your name and email address to Computershare as described below. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, April 11, 2024. You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after Computershare receives your registration materials. Requests for registration should be directed to Computershare at the following addresses:

By email: Forward the email from your broker granting you a Legal Proxy, or attach an image of your Legal Proxy, to legalproxy@computershare.com.

By mail: Computershare, M&T Bank Corporation Legal Proxy, P.O. Box 43001, Providence, RI 02940-3001.

What is the difference between a Registered Holder and a Beneficial Holder?

If your shares of M&T common stock are registered in your name with M&T’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered to be a Registered Holder. M&T will mail the notice directly to you (or will mail the printed proxy materials, including a proxy card, as requested).

If your shares of M&T common stock are held by a broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary, then that intermediary is considered the shareholder of record, the shares are considered held in “street name,” and you are considered to be a Beneficial Holder. This intermediary will send the notice to you (or will send the printed proxy materials with the intermediary’s voting instruction card, as requested).

As the Beneficial Holder of the shares, you have the right to direct your intermediary on how to vote and you are also invited to attend the virtual Annual Meeting. However, if you are a Beneficial Holder, you are not the shareholder of record and in order to vote your shares during the meeting you must follow the instructions from your intermediary. Please refer to the information your intermediary provided to you. NYSE rules do not permit an intermediary to vote street name shares on “non-routine” matters, such as the election of directors and advisory vote to approve the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs, unless it has received voting instructions from the beneficial holder. M&T encourages Beneficial Holders to promptly direct their intermediary on how to vote their shares for the agenda items.

 

88

 


 

LOGO


How are we distributing our proxy materials?

To expedite delivery, reduce costs and decrease the environmental impact of our proxy materials, we are again using an SEC rule known as “Notice and Access” that allows us to furnish proxy materials over the internet instead of mailing paper copies of those materials to each shareholder. As a result, beginning on or about March 5, 2024, shareholders were sent a Notice of Internet Availability containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including this proxy statement, as well as the message to shareholders and Form 10-K that together comprise our annual report for 2023, over the internet. If you received the notice, you will not receive paper copies of the proxy materials unless you request the materials by following the instructions in the notice. The notice is not a proxy card that can be submitted to vote your shares. Instead, the notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials. The notice also instructs you on how to vote via the internet. Shareholders who have requested paper copies of the proxy materials will receive printed copies in the mail.

If you received paper copies of the proxy materials, but instead in the future would like to receive only the proxy materials electronically, you can elect to do so by: (i) following the instructions provided in the proxy card, if your shares are registered in your name (i.e., a Registered Holder), or (ii) by contacting your broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary, if you hold your shares in street name (i.e., a Beneficial Holder).

How can I vote by proxy?

You can vote by proxy by following the internet or telephone voting procedures described on the notice or proxy card or by completing and returning a physical proxy card or, if you are a Beneficial Holder and hold your shares in street name, by following the voting instruction card you receive from your broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary. The internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate that you are a shareholder by use of a control number and allow you to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you are a Registered Holder, the method by which you vote will not limit your right to vote at the Annual Meeting if you later decide to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, as described above.

May I revoke my proxy?

How you hold your shares (Registered Holder or Beneficial Holder) determines how and when you may revoke your proxy. A Registered Holder may revoke a proxy that has been previously given at any time before it is exercised by giving written notice of such revocation or by delivering a later dated proxy, in either case, to the Corporate Secretary, at One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203, or by attending and voting during the virtual Annual Meeting. A Beneficial Holder of shares in street name must follow the instructions from his or her broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary to revoke a previously given proxy.

How will my proxy be voted?

Your proxy will be voted in accordance with the directions you provide. If you sign, date and return your proxy card but do not specify how you want to vote your shares, your shares will be voted FOR the election as directors of the 16 persons named under the section titled “Nominees for Director;FOR approving, on an advisory basis, the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs; and FOR ratifying the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2024.

 

Your vote matters – here’s how to vote! Online 1 PCF Go to www.envisionreports.com/MTB or scan the QR code — you will need the number located in the shaded bar below. Votes submitted electronically must be received by 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on April 16, 2021 for the Retirement Savings Plan and Unvested Restricted Common Stock. You may vote online or by phone instead

LOGO

89


What is required for a quorum at the Annual Meeting?

The presence, or presence by proxy, of the holders of record of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes will be counted as being present or represented at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum, but, under NYSE rules, brokers will not be permitted to vote in the election of directors or the advisory vote to approve the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs, unless specific voting instructions are provided to the broker. We therefore encourage Beneficial Holders whose shares are held in street name to direct the vote of their shares for all agenda items on the form of proxy or instruction card sent by their broker, trustee, bank or other intermediary.

What approval is necessary for Proposal 1 and what happens if an incumbent director nominee does not receive a majority of votes in favor of his or her election?

Pursuant to M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, in an uncontested election of directors, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast with respect to the nominee is required for the election of such nominee as a director, assuming a quorum is present or represented at the Annual Meeting. This means that the number of votes cast “for” a particular nominee for director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” the nominee for director. If an incumbent director receives more “against” votes than “for” votes in an uncontested election, that director would still be elected, but would be required to tender his or her resignation to the Board for consideration in accordance with M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.

What approval is necessary to approve Proposals 2 and 3?

For Proposals 2 and 3, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, which means the number of votes cast “for” the proposal must exceed the number of votes cast “against,” is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs (Proposal 2) and the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2024 (Proposal 3).

How are abstentions and broker non-votes counted?

Abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. However, an abstention will not constitute a vote cast and therefore will not affect the outcome of the vote on the election of directors (Proposal 1), the advisory vote to approve the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs (Proposal 2), or the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2024 (Proposal 3).

Broker non-votes are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. However, broker non-votes will not constitute votes cast for the election of directors (Proposal 1) or for the approval of the 2023 compensation of M&T’s NEOs (Proposal 2) and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of any of these proposals. A broker or other nominee may generally vote in their discretion on “routine” matters, such as Proposal 3, and therefore no broker non-votes are expected in connection with the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of M&T for the year ending December 31, 2024 (Proposal 3).

Who is paying for the solicitation of proxies?

M&T will bear the cost of soliciting proxies in the accompanying form of proxy. We are making this solicitation by mail, by telephone and in person using the services of employees of M&T or its subsidiaries at nominal cost. In addition, M&T has retained Georgeson to assist in the solicitation of mailing this card. Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada. Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.envisionreports.com/MTB. Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. 2021 Annual Meeting Proxy Card/Instruction Card/Voting Card qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE. 01 - C. Angela Bontempo 04 - T. Jefferson Cunningham III 07 - Richard S. Gold 02 - Robert T. Brady 05 - Gary N. Geisel 08 - Richard A. Grossi 03 - Calvin G. Butler, Jr. 06 - Leslie V. Godridge 09 - René F. Jones For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold 10 - Richard H. Ledgett, Jr. 11 - Newton P.S. Merrill 12 - Kevin J. Pearson 13 - Melinda R. Rich 14 - Robert E. Sadler, Jr. 15 - Denis J. Salamone 16 - John R. Scannell 17 - David S. Scharfstein 18 - Rudina Seseri 19 - Herbert L. Washington 03DVXE Proposals — The Board of Directors of M&T Bank Corporation A recommends a vote FOR the following proposals. qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.q 2021 Annual Meeting Proxy Card/Instruction Card/Voting Card 2. TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF M&T BANK CORPORATION’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS. 1. TO ELECT 19 DIRECTORS FOR ONE-YEAR TERMS AND UNTIL THEIR SUCCESSORS HAVE BEEN ELECTED AND QUALIFIED. For Against Abstain 3. TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM OF M&T BANK CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021. For Against Abstain

 

90

 


 

LOGO


proxies for a fee of approximately $11,000 plus the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and disbursements of that firm. We will reimburse brokers, trustees, banks and other intermediaries for expenses they incur in mailing proxy materials to Beneficial Holders of M&T’s common stock.

How do I propose actions for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders?

SEC Rule 14a-8

In order for a shareholder proposal at next year’s meeting, the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be eligible for inclusion in M&T’s proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8, we must receive the proposal at our principal executive offices no later than November 5, 2024. You must provide your proposal to us in writing and it must comply with the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8.

Advance Notice Procedures

M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws state that no business may be brought before an annual meeting of shareholders unless it is specified in the notice of the meeting or is otherwise brought before the meeting by the Board or by a shareholder entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting who has delivered notice to M&T (containing the information specified in M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws) in compliance with the advance notice requirements specified in M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws. Under M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, any such shareholder entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting may nominate an individual for election to the Board or propose other business to be brought directly at an annual meeting of shareholders by giving advance notice to M&T (containing the information specified in M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws) no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which M&T first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders. These advance notice procedures are separate from the SEC’s requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in M&T’s proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 referred to above. A shareholder’s notice of a nomination or other business for consideration at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be delivered by no earlier than October 6, 2024 and no later than November 5, 2024. In addition, pursuant to the SEC’s universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the M&T’s nominees must comply with the additional requirement of Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act.

Proxy Access Procedures

M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws permit a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, who has continuously owned at least 3% of the outstanding shares of M&T’s common stock for at least three years to nominate and include in our proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders director nominees constituting up to the greater of two directors or 20% of the total number of directors serving on the Board on the last day on which notice of a nomination may be delivered (known generally as “proxy access”).

The proxy access notice must be in writing and contain the information specified in M&T’s Amended and Restated Bylaws for a proxy access nomination and must be delivered no earlier than 150 days and no later than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date on which M&T first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders. A shareholder wishing to submit a proxy access notice regarding a nomination for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should do so no earlier than October 6, 2024 and no later than November 5, 2024.

These proxy access procedures are separate from the advance notice procedures referred to above, from the SEC’s requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to have a shareholder proposal included in our proxy statement pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 referred to above, and from the procedures you must follow to submit a director nominee for consideration by the N&G Committee as described in this proxy statement (see “Nomination and Governance Committeein the section titled “Corporate Governance of M&T Bank Corporation”).

 

Small steps make an impact. Please consider helping the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery by signing up at www.envisionreports.com/MTB. qIF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.q Annual Meeting of Shareholders -- April 20, 2021, 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby appoints Matthew Dalbke, Thomas P. Jacob and Patrick D. Paul as Proxies and authorizes said Proxies,

LOGO

91


How do I discontinue multiple mailings?

In accordance with a notice sent to certain shareholders who receive paper copies of the proxy materials, multiple shareholders sharing a single address will receive only one copy of this proxy statement, the message to shareholders and Form 10-K, unless we have previously received other instructions. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce printing and postage costs.

If you are a Registered Holder and have more than one account in your name or at the same address as other shareholders of record, you may authorize M&T to discontinue mailings of multiple sets of proxy materials. To discontinue multiple mailings, or to reinstate multiple mailings, please either mail your request to M&T Bank Corporation, Attention: Shareholder Relations, One M&T Plaza, Buffalo, New York 14203, or send your request to Shareholder Relations via electronic mail at ir@mtb.com.

92

LOGO


Appendix A

Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures

As indicated in this proxy statement, the C&HC Committee and management use certain non-GAAP measures, such as Return on Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE), as part of M&T’s executive compensation program, which they believe better reflect the impact of acquisition activity in reported results.

Below is a reconciliation of GAAP amounts with corresponding non-GAAP amounts for 2021, 2022 and 2023.

   Year ended
12/31/2023
  Year ended
12/31/2022
  Year ended
12/31/2021
 

Income statement data

In millions

    

Net income

  $2,741  $1,992  $1,859 

Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets(a)

   48   43   7 

Merger-related expenses(a)

   —    431   34 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net operating income

   2,789   2,466   1,900 

Less preferred stock dividends

   (100  (97  (73
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net operating income available to common equity

  $2,689  $2,369  $1,827 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Balance sheet data

In millions

 

    

Average common equity

    

Average total equity

  $25,899  $23,810  $16,909 

Preferred stock

   (2,011  (1,946  (1,438
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Average common equity

   23,888   21,864   15,471 

Goodwill, core deposit and other intangible assets

   (8,650  (7,716  (4,601

Deferred taxes

   44   43   2 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Average tangible common equity

  $15,282  $14,191  $10,872 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net operating return on average tangible common equity

   17.60  16.70  16.80

(a)

After any one of them, to represent and to vote all of the shares of common stock of M&T Bank Corporation which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held virtually via the internet at www.meetingcenter.io/204103780 on April 20, 2021, 11:00 A.M. Eastern Time, and any adjournments thereof (i) as designated on the proposals set forth on the reverse side of this card and (ii) at the discretion of said Proxies, or any one of them, on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. IF PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED OR, IF NOT SPECIFIED, WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL PROPOSALS. Participants in the M&T Bank Corporation Retirement Savings Plan In accordance with the M&T Bank Corporation Retirement Savings Plan (“Plan”), the undersigned hereby directs T. Rowe Price Trust Company, the Trustee of the Plan to vote all of the shares of common stock of M&T Bank Corporation allocated to the undersigned under the Plan in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. IF PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS INSTRUCTION CARD WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NOT DIRECTED, WILL BE DIRECTED TO VOTE IN THE SAME PROPORTION AS SHARES THAT WERE AFFIRMATIVELY VOTED BY PARTICIPANTS. Holders of Unvested Restricted Common Stock The undersigned hereby votes all of the shares of unvested restricted common stock of M&T Bank Corporation held by the undersigned in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. IF PROPERLY EXECUTED, THIS VOTING CARD WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED OR, IF NOT SPECIFIED, WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL PROPOSALS. PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE OR VOTE VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE. (Items to be voted on appear on reverse side) PROXY CARD/INSTRUCTION CARD/VOTING CARD - M&T BANK CORPORATION C Change of Address Please print new address below. Please sign exactly as name(s) appear(s) hereon. If applicable, joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. The 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of M&T Bank Corporation will be held on April 20, 2021, 11:00 A.M. Eastern Time, virtually via the internet at www.meetingcenter.io/204103780. To access the virtual meeting, you must have the number that is printed in the shaded bar located on the reverse side of this form. The password for this meeting is — MTB2021 YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! Proxy materials are available online at: www.envisionreports.com/MTBrelated tax effect

The company’s three-year average ROTCE of 17.03% for payout of the 2021 PVSU grant was calculated by taking the average ROTCE for each of the three years in the performance period.

ROTCE Description. ROTCE is computed by dividing net operating income available to common equity by average tangible common equity. Net operating income available to common equity is computed by taking net income available to common equity and adding back the after-tax effect of the amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, adding back the after-tax effects of merger-related expenses, and subtracting the after-tax effects of merger-related gains. Average tangible common equity is computed by taking average common equity for the applicable period and subtracting average goodwill and average core deposit and other intangible assets (net of any related average deferred tax amounts).

LOGO

A-1


ROTA Description. As described in this proxy statement, in 2024, the C&HC Committee approved a plan design change for the PVSUs granted in 2024. This updated plan maintains a three-year cliff vesting schedule, but now includes two metrics, ROTCE and Return on Tangible Assets (“ROTA”). ROTA is computed by dividing net operating income by average tangible assets. Net operating income is computed by taking net income and adding back the after-tax effect of the amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, adding back the after-tax effects of merger-related expenses, and subtracting the after-tax effects of merger-related gains. Average tangible assets is computed by taking average common assets for the applicable period and subtracting average goodwill and average core deposit and other intangible assets (net of any related average deferred tax amounts).

As also referenced in this proxy statement, see “Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations” in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of M&T’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, for the GAAP reconciliation of, and other information regarding, non-interest operating expenses.

A-2

LOGO


 

 

LOGO

mtb.com

©2021 M&T Bank Corporation. 36680 191205 VF


LOGO


LOGO